Annuity applicant appears to exceed exemption receipts limit
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A foreign applicant sought exemption under section 501(c)(15) as an insurance company other than a life insurance company. It received large purchase payments under contracts labeled as deferred variable and immediate annuities, but the materials did not establish the guarantees, binding terms, or actual activities needed to decide whether more than half of its business involved issuing insurance or annuity contracts. Chief Counsel therefore could not reach a definitive conclusion on insurance-company status under section 816(a). Even if the applicant qualified as an insurance company, its purchase payments appeared to push annual gross receipts above the $600,000 ceiling in section 501(c)(15). Counsel also observed that treating most of those payments as something other than premiums or gross income would make it difficult to show that more than half of the applicant's business was insurance activity.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Does the applicant qualify for section 501(c)(15) exemption as a nonlife insurance company?
- Outcome: advice given; the record was insufficient on insurance-company status, and gross receipts appeared to exceed the statutory limit
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(15), 816(a), 832(b)(5)(A)(i), 834(b); Rev. Rul. 77-286; Notice 2006-42
Full text (IRS public release)
Office of Chief Counsel
Internal Revenue Service memorandum
Number: 201702037
Release Date: 1/13/2017
CC:FIP:B04:JEGlover
Third Party Communication: None
POSTU-100264-15
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
UILC: 831.00-00, 501.15-00
date: September 14, 2016
to: Patrick Greenleaf
Area Counsel (Mid-Atlantic)
Tax Exempt Governmental Entities
from: Alexis A. MacIvor
Chief, Branch 4
Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions & Products)
subject: Application for Exemption under § 501(c)(15)
This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your request for assistance. This advice may not be used or cited as precedent.
LEGEND
Applicant = ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Country = ---------
X = ----------------
Y = --------------
ISSUE
Does Applicant qualify as an insurance company other than a life insurance company within the description of § 501(c)(15)?
POSTU-100264-15
2
CONCLUSION
The information provided does not allow us to reach a definitive conclusion as to whether Applicant qualifies as an insurance company other than a life insurance company; however, even if Applicant does qualify, Applicant’s gross receipts for Year 1 and Year 2 appear to exceed the $600,000 per year limitation in § 501(c)(15).
FACTS
Briefly stated, Applicant was formed in Country during Year 1 and is not a mutual company. Applicant received “purchase payments” in Year 1 and Year 2 under two contracts that are labelled annuity contracts; one is a characterized as deferred variable contract and the other is characterized as an immediate annuity. In the specimen contracts provided, it is not clear whether Applicant provided any contractual guarantees. Specifically, neither contract provides for a guaranteed purchase rate1 and both contracts allow for selection of an annuity settlement option that is not specified in the contract but is to be agreed between the counterparty and Applicant in the future. Moreover, the terms of the deferred contract may not necessarily comply with § 72(s).
The information provided does not indicate the nature of Applicant’s actual activities including, for example, whether and under what binding terms either of the specimen contracts was actually issued, though Applicant reports that it received “purchase payments” of $ X during Year 1 and $ Y during Year 2.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 501(a) provides that an organization described in § 501(c) shall be exempt from the income tax, unless denied under § 502 or 503.
The list of organizations described in § 501(c) includes insurance companies (as defined in § 816(a)) other than life (including interinsurers and reciprocal underwriters) if, in the case of a stock insurance company, the gross receipts for the taxable year do not exceed $600,000 and more than 50% of such gross receipts consist of premiums.
Section 816(a) defines an insurance company to “mean any company more than half of the business of which during the taxable year is the issuing of insurance or annuity contracts or the reinsuring of risks underwritten by insurance companies.”
Section 816(a) provides that the term life insurance company
means an insurance company which is engaged in the business of issuing life insurance and annuity contracts (either separately or combined with accident and health
1
The “immediate” annuity does not annuitize at inception but within one year of inception and annuitizes at the purchase rate in effect at annuitization (which could be different than the rate in effect at inception).
POSTU-100264-15
3
insurance), or noncancellable contracts of health and accident insurance, if – (1) its life insurance reserves (as defined in § 816(b)), plus (2) unearned premiums, and unpaid losses (whether or not ascertained), on noncancellable life, accident, or health policies not included in life insurance reserves, comprise more than 50 percent of its total reserves (as defined in § 816(c)).
The House Report explains this provision, and as it relates to what business is an insurance activity, advises that
whether a contract with less than a permanent guarantee should be considered an insurance or annuity contract would depend on the terms of the contract. That is, it will depend on whether the company has assumed a significant insurance risk or has made an annuity guarantee (for life or a fixed period). Generally, the assumption of solely an investment risk would not give rise to an insurance liability.
H. Rep. 98-432 (Pt II) at 1404 (1984). In addition, Rev. Rul. 77-286, 1977-2 C.B. 228, provides
…The deposit administration contract contains a limited annuity purchase rate guarantee lasting for a stated initial period. … However, since the contract does not provide for permanent purchase rate guarantees during the employees’ active lives, it does not constitute an annuity contract during its accumulation phase, and accordingly, the funds held under the deposit administration contract do not qualify has life insurance reserves.
Notice 2006-42, 2006-1 C.B. 878, advises that gross receipts for purposes of
§ 501(c)(15) include premiums (including deposits and assessments), without reduction for return premiums or premiums paid for reinsurance, items described in § 834(b) (gross investment income of a non-life insurance company), and other items that are properly included in the taxpayer’s gross income under subchapter B of chapter 1, subtitle A, of the Code. Gross receipts for purposes of § 501(c)(15) do not include amounts other than premium income or gross investment income unless those amounts are otherwise included in gross income; the term does not include contributions to capital excluded from gross income or salvage or reinsurance recovered that offset losses incurred under §832(b)(5)(A)(i).
Here, from the specimen contracts it cannot be determined whether more than half of Applicant’s business involves the issuance of insurance or annuity contracts as
POSTU-100264-15
4
contemplated by § 816(a), and, if so, whether Applicant is a life insurance company within the meaning of § 816(a).
Moreover, to meet the $600,000 limitation on annual gross receipts in § 501(c)(15), a substantial portion of the “purchase payments” received by Applicant in Year 1 and Year 2 would have to be characterized as amounts other than premiums or other gross income. If the “purchase payments” were so characterized, Applicant has not explained how more than half of its business during each taxable year is the issuing of insurance or annuity contracts or the reinsuring of risks underwritten by an insurance company. In fact, given that $ X and $ Y so significantly exceed $600,000, it is difficult to imagine any set of circumstances in which Applicant could in each taxable year both (i) qualify as an insurance company because more than half of its business is the issuing of insurance and annuity contracts or the reinsuring of risks underwritten by an insurance company and (ii) have gross receipts of less than $600,000.
This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this writing may undermine our ability to protect the privileged information. If disclosure is determined to be necessary, please contact this office for our views.
Please call (202) 317-4450 if you have any further questions.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace