Consolidated group receives late basis-reduction election relief
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Two foreign subsidiaries intended to make a joint IRC § 362(e)(2)(C) election for a transfer of loss property that was intended to qualify under IRC § 351. The election would reduce the transferor's basis in the stock received instead of reducing the transferee's basis in the transferred property, but the consolidated group's parent failed to file it on time. The IRS found reasonable reliance on a qualified tax professional and granted 60 days to file the election. Relief was conditioned on the relevant parties' aggregate federal tax liability not being lower than it would have been with a timely election, after accounting for the time value of money.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the consolidated group file a late IRC § 362(e)(2)(C) election for a transfer of loss property?
- Outcome: approved; a 60-day extension was granted subject to a tax-liability condition
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 351, 362(e)(2); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.362-4, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201701005 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/6/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 362.01-00, 9100.22-00
Person To Contact:
------------------- ---------------------------, ID No. ---------------
------------------------------- -----------------
---------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:B05
PLR-114859-16
Date:
October 06, 2016
TY:-------
Legend
Taxpayer = ----------------------------------
------------------------
-------------------------
FSub1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
--------------------------------------------------
FSub2 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
--------------------------------------------------
FSub3 = -----------------------------------
------------
------------------------------------------------
FSub4 = ----------------------------------------------------------
------------
--------------------------------------
DRE1 = -----------------------------
------------------------
------------------------------------------
FDRE2 = --------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLR-114859-16 2
FDRE3 = ----------------------------------------
------------
------------------------------------------
Date 1 = -------------------
Date 2 = --------------------
a = ----------------
b = --
c = -----
Tax = -------------------------
Professional -------------
---------------------------
Company = ------------------
Official ------------------------------
----------------------------------
Dear -----------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated May 4, 2016, submitted by your authorized
representative, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure
and Administration Regulations to file an election. The extension is being requested in
order to allow Taxpayer to file an election under § 362(e)(2)(C) of the Internal Revenue
Code (the “Code”) on behalf of FSub1 and Fsub2 with respect to the Date 1 Transfer
(as defined below) (the “Election”). The material information is summarized below.
Taxpayer is a corporation that is the common parent of consolidated group. Prior to
Date 1, Taxpayer owned, directly and indirectly through a member of its consolidated
group, all of the shares of FSub1, a controlled foreign corporation within the meaning of
§ 957(c) (a “CFC”). FSub1 directly owned all the shares of FSub2, a CFC, and all the
membership interests of DRE1, an entity disregarded as separate from its owner for
U.S. federal income tax purposes (a “Disregarded Entity”). FSub1 and DRE1 owned a
and b shares, respectively, of Disregarded Entity FDRE2, constituting all of its equity
interests. FDRE2 directly owned all of the shares of CFC FSub3 and Disregarded
Entity FDRE3. FDRE3 directly owned all of the shares of CFC FSub4.
PLR-114859-16 3
On Date1, FSub1 contributed all of the membership interests in DRE1 and all of its
shares of FDRE2 to FSub2 in exchange for c FSub2 shares (“the Date 1 Transfer”).
The Date 1 Transfer was intended to qualify as a tax-free exchange to which § 351
applies. At the time of the Date 1 Transfer, the property transferred had a tax basis
exceeding fair market value.
Section 362(e)(2)(A) generally provides that if property is transferred to a corporation as
a capital contribution or in an exchange to which § 351 applies and the aggregate
adjusted basis of the transferred property would, but for that provision, exceed the fair
market value of such property immediately after the transaction, then the transferee
corporation's basis in such property shall not exceed the fair market value of such
property.
Under § 362(e)(2)(C), however, the transferor and transferee may make a joint election
to reduce the transferor's basis in the stock received to its fair market value, and no
reduction of the transferee's basis in the property received will be required. Section
362(e)(2)(C) provides that such election shall be made at such time and in such form
and manner as the Secretary may prescribe and, once made, shall be irrevocable.
Section 362(e)(2)(A) does not apply, and the election under § 362(e)(2)(C) is not
available, to exchanges subject to § 362(e)(1).
Generally, for transactions after September 3, 2013, rules for making elections under
§ 362(e)(2)(C) are in § 1.362-4(d)(3). Date 1 is a date after September 3, 2013.
The Election was required to be filed on or with Taxpayer's timely filed income tax return
for the year ending Date 2. For various reasons, however, Taxpayer failed to file the
Election in a timely manner. Taxpayer has represented that it does not seek to alter a
return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed
under § 6662 at the time Taxpayer requested relief (taking into account any qualified
amended return filed within the meaning of § 1.6664-2(c)(3)).
Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as an election whose due
date is prescribed by a regulation, revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Sections 301.9100-1
through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine
whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-
1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Requests for relief under
PLR-114859-16 4
§ 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith,
and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section
301.9100-3(a).
The time for filing the Election under § 362(e)(2)(C) is fixed by § 1.362-4(d)(3)(ii).
Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-3 to grant an
extension of time for Taxpayer to file the Election, provided Taxpayer acted reasonably
and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and
granting relief will not prejudice the government.
Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Taxpayer, Tax Professional,
and Company Official explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file
the Election. The information establishes that Taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified
tax professional who failed to make, or advise Taxpayer to make, the Election, and that
the request for relief was filed before the failure to timely make the Election was
discovered by the Internal Revenue Service. See § 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i) and (v).
Based on the facts and information submitted, including the affidavits submitted and the
representations made, we conclude that Taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith,
the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will
not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, an extension of time is
granted under § 301.9100-3, until 60 days from the date on this letter, for Taxpayer to
file the Election, in the manner described in § 1.362-4(d)(3).
This extension of time is conditioned on the federal tax liability (if any) of any relevant
party not being lower, in the aggregate, for all years to which the Election applies than it
would have been if the Election had been timely made (taking into account the time
value of money). No opinion is expressed as to the tax liability for the years involved. A
determination thereof will be made by the Director's office upon audit of the federal
income tax returns involved.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction discussed in this letter. Specifically,
no opinion is expressed as to whether the Date 1 Transfer is described in § 351,
whether Taxpayer is entitled to make the Election, nor is any opinion expressed
concerning the basis or fair market value of any asset. In addition, we express no
opinion as to the tax effects or consequences of filing the Election late under the
provisions of any other section of the Code or regulations, or as to the tax treatment of
any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, filing the Election late
that are not specifically set forth in the above ruling.
For purposes of granting relief under § 301.9100-3, we have relied on certain
statements and representations that Taxpayer, Tax Professional, and Company Official
PLR-114859-16 5
made under penalties of perjury. However, the Director should verify all essential facts.
Moreover, notwithstanding that the extension is granted under § 301.9100-3 to file the
Election, any penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable still apply.
The letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to the return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
__________________________________
Ken Cohen
Chief, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.