Subsidiary receives relief after inadvertent QSub termination

Number
201653018
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 6110
Ruling dated
September 19, 2016
Publicly released
December 30, 2016

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation's wholly owned subsidiary had a QSub election in effect. During a reorganization, shares of the subsidiary were temporarily issued to another corporation and then distributed to an individual, causing the QSub election to terminate because the subsidiary had more than one owner. The shares were transferred back to the S corporation after the error was discovered, and the parties represented that there was no tax avoidance or retroactive planning. The IRS found the termination inadvertent and ruled that the subsidiary would be treated as an S corporation from the termination date forward, provided its QSub election had otherwise been valid and was not otherwise terminated.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the subsidiary receive relief after its QSub election terminated because shares were temporarily held outside the S corporation?
  • Outcome: approved, subject to the stated validity and termination conditions
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361, 1362(f)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201653018
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/30/2016
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------
-----------------------, ID No. -------------------
----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------
----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:1
PLR-112186-16
Date:
September 19, 2016

Legend

X = -------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------

Y = ------------------------------
-------------------------------------------

Z = ----------------------------------------------------

A = ----------------------

State = -----------------

Date1 = --------------------

Date2 = --------------------

Date3 = -------------------------

Date4 = -------------------------

Date5 = ---------------------------

Date6 = --------------------

Dear --------------:
PLR-112186-16
2

This letter responds to a letter dated March 31, 2016, submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

FACTS

The information submitted states that Y was incorporated under the laws of State on Date1. X was incorporated under the laws of State on Date2. A was the sole shareholder of X and Y. X and Y each elected to be treated as an S corporation effective Date3. A transferred A’s shares in Y to X on Date4. X elected to treat Y as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub) effective Date4. On Date5, as part of a reorganization, shares of Y were issued to Z, a corporation wholly owned by A, causing Y’s Qsub election to terminate because it had more than one owner. Z distributed these shares to A as part of the same reorganization. Upon discovering the error, A transferred these shares of Y to X on Date6.

X represents that there was no tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning involved in the transfer of shares of Y to Z, A, or X. In addition, X and its shareholder agree to make any adjustments consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation and Y as a QSub as may be required by the Secretary. X also represents that X and its shareholder have filed consistently with X’s status as an S corporation and Y’s status as a QSub.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(a)(1) of the Code provides that the term "S corporation" means, with respect to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for such year.

Section 1361(b)(1) defines a "small business corporation" as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than 1 class of stock.

Section 1361(b)(3)(A) provides that a QSub shall not be treated as a separate corporation, and all assets, liabilities, and items of income, deduction, and credit of a QSub shall be treated as assets, liabilities, and such items (as the case may be) of the S corporation.

Section 1361(b)(3)(B) defines a "qualified subchapter S subsidiary" as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation, if 100 percent of the stock of the
PLR-112186-16
3

corporation is owned by the S corporation, and the S corporation elects to treat the corporation as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) or § 1361(b)(3)(B)(ii) by any corporation was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents; (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness were inadvertent; (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the election was made is a small business corporation or a QSub, as the case may be, or to acquire the required shareholder consents; and (4) the corporation for which the election was made, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agree to make the adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation or a QSub, as the case may be) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to this period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation or a QSub, as the case may be, during the period specified by the Secretary.

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that Y’s QSub election was terminated on Date5 and that the termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Consequently, we rule that Y will be treated as an S corporation from Date5 and thereafter provided that Y’s QSub election was otherwise valid and not otherwise terminated under § 1361(b)(3)(C).

Except as specifically ruled above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code, including whether X is a valid S corporation and Y is otherwise a QSub.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-112186-16
4

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Laura C. Fields
Laura C. Fields
Senior Technician Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace