Sale to foreign owner caused inadvertent S termination
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Two shareholders sold an S corporation's stock to a foreign corporation, which was not an eligible S corporation shareholder. After learning that the sale had terminated the S election, the parties rescinded the agreement and restored their prior positions. The IRS found the termination inadvertent and treated the corporation as continuing to be an S corporation throughout the period, assuming the election was otherwise valid. It also treated the two original owners as the shareholders during the period when the foreign corporation held the stock.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Will the corporation receive inadvertent-termination relief after its shares were temporarily owned by a foreign corporation?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b)(1), 1362(d)(2), 1362(f)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201651005 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/16/2016 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
-------------- -------------------------, ID No. -----------------
--------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B3
PLR-108550-16
Date: Sept. 6, 2016
LEGEND
X = -----------------
------------------------
Y = --------------------
A = ------------------------
---------------------------
B = --------------------
State = ---------
Date 1 = ----------------------
Date 2 = ------------------
Date 3 = ------------------------
Date 4 = ----------------------------
Dear ----------------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated March 8, 2016, submitted on behalf of X,
requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
FACTS
The information submitted states that X was incorporated in State on Date 1 and
elected to be treated as an S corporation effective Date 1. On Date 2, A and B, the
PLR-108550-16 2
shareholders of X, sold their shares of X stock to Y, a foreign corporation under a
purchase agreement. As a result, X’s S corporation election terminated on Date 2.
In Date 3, X learned that its S corporation election terminated on Date 2. After
learning that X’s S corporation election was terminated, X took corrective steps so that
on Date 4, A, B and Y rescinded the purchase agreement putting all parties in the same
position they occupied prior to the sale on Date 2. Consequently, by Date 4, all of X’s
shareholders were eligible S corporation shareholders under § 1361(b)(1)(B).
X represents that the termination of X’s S corporation election was not motivated
by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to
make any adjustments consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation as may be
required by the Commissioner with respect to the period specified by § 1362(f).
LAW
Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term "S corporation" means, with respect to
any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for such year.
Section 1361(b)(1) provides, in part, that the term "small business corporation"
means a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not
have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2),
or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual.
Section 1362(a) provides that, except as provided in § 1362(g), a small business
corporation may elect, in accordance with the provisions of § 1362, to be an S
corporation.
Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be
terminated whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for
which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small
business corporation.
Section 1362(f) provides, in part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any
corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined
without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of
§ 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2)
or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the
ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of
time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination,
steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to
acquire the required shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person
who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified
PLR-108550-16 3
pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment
of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with
respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the
ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during
the period specified by the Secretary.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that
X's S corporation election terminated on Date 2 when shares of X stock were
transferred to an ineligible shareholder. However, we conclude that the circumstances
resulting in the termination were inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f).
Accordingly, under § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from
Date 2 to Date 4, and thereafter provided that X's S corporation election was valid and
not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d). Moreover, we rule that during the period
from Date 2 to Date 4, A and B will be treated as shareholders of X.
Except as specifically ruled above, we express or imply no opinion concerning
the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provisions of the
Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion as to whether X is otherwise eligible
to be treated as an S corporation. In addition, we express or imply no opinion on
whether the purchase agreement can be rescinded for federal income tax purposes.
See § 3.02(8) of Rev. Proc. 2016-3, 2016-1 I.R.B. 126, 133.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-108550-16 4
In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a
copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Mary Beth Carchia
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures: Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.