Determination Letter 201649017 Released December 2, 2016 Denied Transcribed from scan

Franchisee association is denied business-league exemption

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An association formed by owners of stores operating under one franchise sought exemption as a business league under section 501(c)(6). Its membership, revenue, educational work, dispute-resolution efforts, trade shows, and dues payments principally served franchisees of that particular store brand. The organization argued that it had begun working with other convenience-store businesses and planned to enroll non-brand franchisees. The IRS concluded that these facts did not overcome the association's actual focus on advancing the interests of one company's franchise owners. Because the organization performed particular services for its members instead of improving conditions across an entire line of business, the IRS denied exemption. The proposed denial became final after the IRS did not receive a protest within the required 30 days.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did an association principally serving franchisees of one store brand qualify as a section 501(c)(6) business league?
  • Outcome: denied, with the proposed adverse determination becoming final after no timely protest
  • Key authorities: IRC § 501(c)(6); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(6)-1; Rev. Ruls. 58-294, 58-394, 66-338, 67-295, and 68-182; National Muffler Dealers Association, Inc. v. United States, 440 U.S. 472 (1979)

Full text (IRS public release)

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Release Number: 201649017                        Date: September 7, 2016
Release Date: 12/2/2016
UIL Code:  501.06-00                             Employer ID number:
           501.06-01
                                                 Contact person/ID number:
                                                 Contact telephone number:
                                                 Form you must file:
                                                 Tax years:

Dear           :

This letter is our final determination that you don’t qualify for tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(6) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Recently, we sent you a proposed adverse determination in response to your
application. The proposed adverse determination explained the facts, law, and basis for our conclusion, and it
gave you 30 days to file a protest. Because we didn’t receive a protest within the required 30 days, the proposed
determination is now final.

You must file federal income tax returns for the tax years listed at the top of this letter using the required form
(also listed at the top of this letter) within 30 days of this letter unless you request an extension of time to file.

We’ll make this final adverse determination letter and the proposed adverse determination letter available for
public inspection (as required under Section 6110 of the Code) after deleting certain identifying information.
Please read the enclosed Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose, and review the two attached letters that
show our proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the instructions in the Notice
437 on how to notify us. If you agree with our deletions, you don’t need to take any further action.

If you have questions about this letter, you can contact the person listed at the top of this letter. If you have
questions about your federal income tax status and responsibilities, call our customer service number at
1-800-829-1040 (TTY 1-800-829-4933 for deaf or hard of hearing) or customer service for businesses at
1-800-829-4933.

Letter 4040 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47635Z


                                                 Sincerely,


                                                 Jeffrey I. Cooper
                                                 Director, Exempt Organizations
                                                 Rulings and Agreements

Enclosures:
Notice 437
Redacted Letter 4034, Proposed Adverse Determination under IRC Section 501(a) Other Than 501(c)(3)
Redacted Letter 4040, Final Adverse Determination under IRC Section 501(a) Other Than 501(c)(3) - No
Protest

Letter 4040 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47635Z


Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

                                                 Date: July 25, 2016
                                                 Employer ID number:
                                                 Contact person/ID number:
                                                 Contact telephone number:
                                                 Contact fax number:

Legend:                                         UIL:
N = Store                                       501.06-00
O = Franchisees of a particular store           501.06-01
P = State
T = Date of incorporation

Dear           :

We considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax under Section 501(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Based on the information provided, we determined that you don’t qualify
for exemption under Section 501(c)(6) of the Code. This letter explains the basis for our conclusion. Please
keep it for your records.

Issues

Do you qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(6) of the Code? No, for the reasons explained below.

Facts

You were incorporated in the state of P on T. While you were formed as a non stock corporation, your Articles
of Incorporation contain no purpose clause. You did not submit a copy of your Bylaws.

You were formed by the owners of N stores. You list your primary functions as:

1.  Educating and helping franchisee members with the N’s current and new policies;

2.  Communicating and finding resolution of member owners issues to N’s executives;

3.  Presenting and communicating the unresolved and disputed issues of franchisees to the O
    president group;

4.  Hosting trade shows with the vendors for the mutual benefit of franchisees and vendors. This
    provides franchisees the opportunity to build one-to-one relationships with the vendors and vice-
    versa.

Your membership is limited to N franchisee owners. Your revenue is exclusively from membership fees. You
forward a fourth of the membership fees you receive from members to O. Your other expenses include
advertisement, meeting expenses, membership fees, trade show expenses, event expenses, and travel expenses.


                                      2

You are governed by your Board of Directors chosen by your membership. All members of your Board of
Directors serve without compensation.

Law

Section 501(c)(6) of the Code provides for exemption of business leagues, chambers of commerce, real estate
boards, boards of trade, and professional football leagues (whether or not administering a pension fund for
football players), which are not organized for profit and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the
benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Treasury Regulation Section 1.501(c)(6)-1 states that a business league is an association of persons having some
common business interest, the purpose of which is to promote such common interest and not to engage in a
regular business of a kind ordinarily carried on for profit. It is an organization of the same general class as a
chamber of commerce or board of trade. Thus, its activities should be directed to the improvement of business
conditions of one or more lines of business as distinguished from the performance of particular services for
individual persons. An organization, whose purpose is to engage in a regular business of a kind ordinarily
carried on for profit, even though the business is conducted on a cooperative basis or produces only sufficient
income to be self-sustaining, is not a business league.

Revenue Ruling 58-294, 1958-1 C.B. 244, holds that an association of licensed dealers in a certain type of
patented product did not qualify as a business league. The association in this ruling owned the controlling
interest in the corporation that held the basic patent of the product, it engaged mainly in furthering the business
interests of its member dealers, and it did not benefit businesses that manufactured competing product of the
same type covered by the patent.

Rev. Rul. 66-338, 1966-2 C.B. 226 describes an organization that was formed to promote the interests of a
particular retail trade and is not exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(6) of the Code because it
advises its members in the operation of their individual businesses and sells supplies and equipment to them.

Rev. Rul. 67-295 states that an organization, composed of businessmen, may qualify for exemption where its
activities are limited to holding luncheon meetings devoted to a discussion, review, and consideration of the
various problems in a particular industry directed to the improvement of business conditions for the industry as
a whole.

Rev. Rul. 68-182 states that the Internal Revenue Service (Service) will not, in similar cases, follow the
decision entered by.the United States Court of Appeals, Seventh District, in Pepsi-Cola Bottlers’ Association,
Inc. v United States. In that case members engaged in the bottling and sale of a single franchised soft-drink
product. Their purposes and activities were directed to the more efficient production and sale of that product. It
is the position of the Service that organizations promoting a single brand or product within a line of business do
not qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(6) of the Code.

In National Muffler Dealers Association, Inc. v. United States, 440 U.S. 472, Ct. D. 1997, 1979-1 C.B. 198
(1979), the Court held that an organization of muffler dealers franchised by Midas International Corporation did
not qualify for exemption from federal income tax as a business league under Section 501(c)(6) of the Code.
The organization's purpose was too narrow to satisfy the line of business test of Treasury Regulation Section
1.501 (c)(6)-1.

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K


                                      3

Application of law

You are not a business league as described in Section 501(c)(6) of the Code and Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(6)
because you are not organized to and your activities are not directed to improving business conditions of one or
more lines of business as defined under this subsection. Rather, you are formed to provide particular services to
your members.

You are not as described in Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(6)-1 because your activities are not directed to the
improvement of business conditions of one or more lines of business and you are formed to provide particular
services to your members.

You are similar to the organization described in Rev. Rul. 58-394. You promote the ‘product’ of N businesses.
Membership is only open to those who own the specified ‘product’ – an N store. You are engaging in activities
that further the interests of the N franchise owners rather than store owners in general. Like that organization,
your activities only benefit and promote the interests your members and not the industry as a whole.

You are similar to the organization in Rev. Rul. 66-338 in that you advise your members in the operation of
their individual N businesses and help them network with vendors. This is a service for the convenience of
members and does not promote or improve a line of businesses in general.

You are not similar to the organization described in Rev. Rul. 67-295. Your membership is restricted to
franchisee owners of O. Your activities do not address the various problems in a particular industry, nor are
they directed to the improvement of business conditions for that industry as a whole. Rather, your activities
address issues and conditions of one particular store, N.

The Service’s position outlined in Rev. Rul. 68-182 applies to you. The promotion of a single business franchise
within a line of business does not qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(6) of the Code. Your activities
are all directed toward franchise owners of N, and all your members are owners of N.

You are similar to the organization described in National Muffler Dealers Association, because your activities
serve members who are specific franchise owners. You provide particular services toward particular franchisees
which does not represent one or more line of businesses. Therefore, you are precluded from exemption under
Section 501(c)(6) of the Code.

Your protest

You submitted a protest in response to our proposed adverse determination letter. The protest included a
completed Form 1024 application in which you deleted references to N.

We asked you to clarify discrepancies between the two applications, provide information regarding any non-N
franchisee members, confirm whether webpages printed from the internet were from your website, and to
confirm the service of submitting N member dues to O.

In your response to our inquiries you indicated that you are part of another organization that is a coalition of
franchisee owners. That coalition consists of several franchise owner associations including your organization,
other N franchise owner associations and non-N franchisee owner associations according to its website. You
state that because you are part of the other organization, you started educating convenience store owners as well
as other franchisees.

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K


                                      4

You state that you will enroll members that are not N franchisees later this year.

You indicated the majority of your members are N franchisees and you discuss issues and concerns of N
corporations.

You communicate with four other businesses that are not N franchisees. You, along with these businesses, have
met with the city police chief to ask for more police patrolling of your convenience stores due to ongoing
robberies.

You confirmed that web prints we provided to you are in fact pages printed from your website. You state that
you still have to amend the website. The pages include the N logo along with your name. One of the webpages
includes links to N’s website. The logo for N is displayed in the information describing your upcoming trade
show. The N logo also appears on the newsletter prepared for your members.

You confirmed that you forward membership dues for each N member to the national franchisee owner’s
organization, O.

Our response to your protest

The information you submitted does not change our original determination that you do not qualify for
exemption. You are formed for the benefit of N franchisee owners. This is evidenced by the fact that the name
of N appears in your Bylaws, enrollment form, website, and membership listing. You forward membership
dues to the national organization of franchisees.

The fact that you have met with other area businesses and the local police to discuss crime in your area does not
override your true purpose, which is to advance the interests of N franchisee owners. Seeking mutual protection
from law enforcement is not enough to support your claim that you advance the convenience store industry as a
whole.

You have not explained how you educate and help franchisees with convenience store policies. You have not
proven that you have access to the business policies of stores other than those of N in order to be in a position to
educate and help.

You have not demonstrated how you communicate and find resolutions between various convenience store
owners and their respective franchisor executives.

You have not provided evidence that you present and communicate unresolved and disputed issues of non-N
franchisees to national non-N franchisor groups.

You have not provided convincing evidence that you represent the interests of convenience store franchisees
owners industry-wide apart from N franchisee owners; therefore, you are not an organization described in
Section 501(c)(6) of the Code.

Conclusion

You are not promoting an industry as a whole. You are organized and operated to promote the interests of your
members who are franchisee owners of a particular company. Your activities are not directed to the
improvement of business conditions of one or more lines of business as distinguished from the performance of

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K


                                      5

particular services for individual persons. Accordingly, we conclude that you are not exempt under Section
501(c)(6) of the Code.

If you don’t agree

You have a right to file a protest if you don’t agree with our proposed adverse determination. To do so, you
must send a statement to us within 30 days of the date of this letter. The statement must include:

•   Your name, address, employer identification number (EIN), and a daytime phone
    number

•   A copy of this letter highlighting the findings you disagree with

•   An explanation of why you disagree, including any supporting documents

•   The law or authority, if any, you are relying on

•   The signature of an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the
    organization, or your authorized representative

•   One of the following declarations:

    For an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the organization:
    Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I examined this protest statement, including
    accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement contains all
    relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.

    For authorized representatives:
    Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I prepared this protest statement, including
    accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement contains all
    relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.

Your representative (attorney, certified public accountant, or other individual enrolled to practice before the
IRS) must file a Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, with us if he or she hasn’t
already done so. You can find more information about representation in Publication 947, Practice Before the
IRS and Power of Attorney.

We’ll review your protest statement and decide if you provided a basis for us to reconsider our determination. If
so, we’ll continue to process your case considering the information you provided. If you haven’t provided a
basis for reconsideration, we’ll forward your case to the Office of Appeals and notify you. You can find more
information about the role of the Appeals Office in Publication 892, How to Appeal an IRS Decision on Tax-
Exempt Status.

If you don’t file a protest within 30 days, you can’t seek a declaratory judgment in court at a later date because
the law requires that you use the IRS administrative process first (Section 7428(b)(2) of the Code).

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K


                                      6

Where to send your protest

Please send your protest statement, Form 2848, if needed, and any supporting documents to the applicable
address:

U.S. mail:                                  Street address for delivery service:

Internal Revenue Service                    Internal Revenue Service
EO Determinations Quality Assurance         EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Room 7-008                                  550 Main Street, Room 7-008
P.O. Box 2508                               Cincinnati, OH 45202
Cincinnati, OH 45201

You can also fax your statement and supporting documents to the fax number listed at the top of this letter. If
you fax your statement, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter to confirm that he or she received
it.

If you agree

If you agree with our proposed adverse determination, you don’t need to do anything. If we don’t hear from you
within 30 days, we’ll issue a final adverse determination letter. That letter will provide information on your
income tax filing requirements.

You can find all forms and publications mentioned in this letter on our website at www.irs.gov/formspubs. If
you have questions, you can contact the person listed at the top of this letter.

                                                 Sincerely,


                                                 Jeffrey I. Cooper
                                                 Director, Exempt Organizations
                                                 Rulings and Agreements

Enclosure:
Publication 892

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.