S corporation termination treated as inadvertent

Number
201643002
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362
Ruling dated
July 21, 2016
Publicly released
October 21, 2016

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation converted into a limited partnership and admitted a limited liability company as a shareholder. That shareholder was ineligible under the S corporation rules, and the conversion also may have created a prohibited second class of stock. After discovering the problems, an eligible shareholder acquired the ineligible holder's shares and the entity converted into a limited liability company. The IRS ruled that both the actual shareholder-based termination and any possible second-class-of-stock termination were inadvertent under section 1362(f). The entity would continue to be treated as an S corporation if its original election was valid, no other termination occurred, and it filed Form 8832 within 120 days.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the entity retain S corporation treatment after an ineligible shareholder and a possible second class of stock terminated its election?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to the ruling's conditions.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361 and 1362.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201643002
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/21/2016
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------
-----------------------, ID No. --------------
----------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-100932-16
Date:
July 21, 2016

X = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------

Y = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------

A = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------

B = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------

C = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------

State = ---------

Date 1 = --------------------------

Date 2 = ------------------

Date 3 = ----------------------

Date 4 = -------------------

Dear ---------------
PLR-100932-16
2

This letter responds to a letter dated December 17, 2015, and subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Facts

The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State on Date 1 and elected to be treated as an S corporation effective Date 1. On Date 2, X converted from a State corporation to a State limited partnership and X filed a new election to be treated as an S corporation. Y was formed as a State limited liability company to act as the general partner in the limited partnership and was wholly owned by individuals A and B. Y became a shareholder of X on Date 2. However, Y was an ineligible S corporation shareholder and therefore X’s S election terminated on Date 2. Effective Date 3, C, an eligible shareholder of X, acquired Y’s shares of X stock.

The conversion on Date 2 may have created a second class of stock in violation of the one class of stock requirement under § 1361(b)(1)(D), thereby possibly creating a second basis for X’s S election to terminate. Therefore, X converted from a State limited partnership to a State limited liability company on Date 4.

X represents that the termination of its S corporation election was inadvertent and was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. Additionally, X represents that X and its shareholders have filed their federal income tax returns consistent with having a valid S corporation election in effect for X. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation as may be required by the Secretary with respect to the period specified by § 1362(f).

Law

Section 1361(a)(1) defines an “S corporation” as a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for the taxable year.

Section 1361(b)(1)(B) provides that a “small business corporation” means a domestic corporation that is not an ineligible corporation and that does not have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in §1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual.

Section 1361(b)(1)(D) provides that, for purposes of subchapter S, the term “small business corporation” means a domestic corporation that does not have more than one class of stock.

Section 1362(d)(2) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which a corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
PLR-100932-16
3

corporation. A termination of an S corporation election under § 1362(d)(2) is effective on and after the date of cessation.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3); (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such termination were inadvertent; (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the termination, steps were taken so that the corporation is a small business corporation; and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified under § 1362(f), agrees to make the adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary for that period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Conclusion

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X’s S corporation election terminated on Date 2 when shares of X were transferred to Y, an ineligible shareholder. We further conclude that the termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Moreover, we conclude that if X’s conversion from a State corporation to a State limited partnership did create a second class of stock, the consequent termination of X’s S corporation election was inadvertent within the meaning of 1362(f).

Accordingly, under § 1362(f), X will be treated as an S corporation from Date 2 and thereafter, provided X’s S corporation election was valid and provided that the election was not otherwise terminated under § 1361(d). This ruling is conditioned upon X filing a Form 8832 within 120 days from the date of this letter with the appropriate service center, with a copy of this letter attached. A copy is enclosed for that purpose.

Except for the specific ruling above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether X was otherwise eligible to be treated as an S corporation.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-100932-16
4

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to X’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Laura C. Fields
Laura C. Fields
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace