Private Letter Ruling 201639008 Released September 23, 2016 Approved

Estate receives more time to elect portability

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An estate missed the deadline to file Form 706 and elect portability of the deceased spouse's unused exclusion amount. The executrix represented that the estate was below the filing threshold and therefore was not otherwise required to file an estate tax return. Because the deadline was imposed by regulation for such an estate, the IRS could grant relief under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. The estate received 120 days to file a complete Form 706 and make the portability election, but the relief would be void if the estate was later found to have been required to file a return under IRC § 6018(a).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the estate make a late election allowing the surviving spouse to use the deceased spouse's unused exclusion amount?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 120 days to file Form 706.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2010(c)(5), 6018(a), 6075(a); Treas. Reg. §§ 20.2010-2T, 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                      Department of the Treasury
                                              Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201639008                             Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/23/2016                       Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2010.04-00, 9100.00-00
                                              Person To Contact:
-------------------------                     -------------------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------------------             Telephone Number:
--------------------------------              --------------------
                                              Refer Reply To:
                                              CC:PSI:B04
                                              PLR-115548-16
                                              Date:
                                              June 08, 2016




Decedent = -----------------------

Spouse         = -------------------------

Date 1         = -------------------

Date 2         = ---------------------




Dear ---------------

This letter responds to your letter of May 8, 2016, requesting an extension of time
pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the
election under § 2010(c)(5)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to allow Decedent's
surviving spouse (Spouse) to take into account Decedent's “deceased spousal unused
exclusion” (DSUE) amount. The facts and representations submitted are as follows.

Facts:

Decedent died on Date 1, survived by Spouse. Date 1 is a date after the effective date
of the amendment to § 2010(c), which provides for portability of a DSUE amount to a
surviving spouse. To obtain the benefit of portability of Decedent's DSUE amount to
Spouse, Decedent's estate was required to file Form 706, United States Estate (and
Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return, on or before the date that is 9 months after
Decedent's date of death or the last day of the period covered by an extension.
Decedent's Form 706 was due on Date 2, but the estate did not file a timely Form 706 to
PLR-115548-16                                 2

make the portability election. The estate discovered its failure to elect portability after
December 31, 2014, the extended due date to make the election under § 2010(c)(5)(A)
as provided by Rev. Proc. 2014-18, 2014-7 I.R.B. 513.

Executrix of Decedent's estate represents that the value of Decedent's gross estate is
less than the basic exclusion amount in the year of Decedent's death including taxable
gifts made during his lifetime. Executrix requests an extension of time pursuant to §
301.9100-3 to elect portability of Decedent's DSUE amount pursuant to § 2010(c)(5)(A).

Law and analysis:

Section 2001(a) imposes a tax on the transfer of the taxable estate of every decedent
who is a citizen or resident of the United States.

Section 2010(a) provides that a credit of the applicable credit amount shall be allowed
to the estate of every decedent against the tax imposed by § 2001.

Section 2010(c)(1) provides that the applicable credit amount is the amount of the
tentative tax that would be determined under § 2001(c) if the amount with respect to
which such tentative tax is to be computed were equal to the applicable exclusion
amount.

On December 17, 2010, Congress amended § 2010(c), effective for estates of
decedents dying and gifts made after December 31, 2010, to allow portability of a
decedent's unused applicable exclusion amount between spouses. Tax Relief,
Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010, Pub. L. No.
111-312, § 303, 124 Stat. 3296, 3302 (2010).

Section 2010(c)(2) provides that the applicable exclusion amount is the sum of the basic
exclusion amount, and, in the case of a surviving spouse, the DSUE amount.

Section 2010(c)(3) generally provides that the basic exclusion amount is $5,000,000, to
be adjusted for inflation annually after calendar year 2011.

Section 2010(c)(4) defines the DSUE amount to mean the lesser of (A) the basic
exclusion amount, or (B) the excess of—(i) the applicable exclusion amount of the last
deceased spouse of the surviving spouse, over (ii) the amount with respect to which the
tentative tax is determined under § 2001(b)(1) on the estate of such deceased spouse.

Section 2010(c)(5)(A) provides that a DSUE amount may not be taken into account by a
surviving spouse under § 2010(c)(2) unless the executor of the estate of the deceased
spouse files an estate tax return on which such amount is computed and makes an
election on such return that such amount may be so taken into account. The election,
PLR-115548-16                                3

once made, shall be irrevocable. No election may be made if such return is filed after
the time prescribed by law (including extensions) for filing such return.

Section 2010(c)(6) provides that the Secretary shall prescribe regulations as may be
necessary or appropriate to implement § 2010(c).

Section 20.2010-2T(a) of the Estate Tax Regulations provides that to allow a decedent's
surviving spouse to take into account that decedent's DSUE amount, the executor of the
decedent's estate must elect portability of the DSUE amount on a timely-filed Form 706.

Section 20.2010-2T(a)(1) provides that an estate that elects portability will be
considered, for purposes of Subtitle B and Subtitle F of the Code to be required to file a
return under § 6018(a). Accordingly, the due date of an estate tax return required to
elect portability is 9 months after the decedent's date of death or the last day of the
period covered by an extension (if an extension of time for filing has been obtained).

Section 20.2010-2T(a)(2) provides that upon the timely filing of a complete and
properly-prepared estate tax return, an executor of an estate of a decedent (survived by
a spouse) will have elected portability of the decedent's DSUE amount unless the
executor chooses not to elect portability and satisfies the requirements for the election
not to apply in § 20.2010-2T(a)(3)(i).

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the
case of taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G,
H, and I.

Section 301.9100-1(b) provides that the term “statutory election” means an election
whose due date is prescribed by statute. The term “regulatory election” means an
election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register,
or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Sections 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use
to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain statutory and
regulatory elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides for an extension of time for making
regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements for an automatic extension of
time under § 301.9100-2.

A request for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides
evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted
PLR-115548-16                                  4

reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of
the government.

Sections 2010(c)(5)(A), 6075(a), and 6018(a), when construed jointly, prescribe a due
date for electing portability for those estates required to file an estate tax return under §
6018. Accordingly, with respect to those estates, the portability election is a statutory
election as defined in § 301.9100-1(b). However, when an executor is not required to
file an estate tax return under § 6018, the Code does not specify a due date for an
estate tax return filed for the purpose of making a portability election. Rather, the
regulations under § 20.2010-2T(a), which are applicable to all estates electing
portability, specify that the portability election must be made on a timely-filed Form 706.
Accordingly, with respect to estates not required to file an estate tax return under §
6018, the portability election is a regulatory election as defined in § 301.9100-1(b).

Conclusion:

Executrix represents that, based on the value of the gross estate and taking into
account any taxable gifts, Decedent's estate is not required to file an estate tax return
under § 6018(a). Under these facts, the Commissioner has discretionary authority
under § 301.9100-3 to grant to Decedent's estate an extension of time to elect
portability.

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the
requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly, an extension of time of
120 days from the date of this letter is granted in which to elect portability under §
2010(c)(5). The election should be made by filing a complete and properly-prepared
Form 706 and a copy of this letter, within 120 days from the date of this letter, to the
Cincinnati Service Center, at the following address: Internal Revenue Service,
Cincinnati Service Center, Stop 82, Cincinnati, OH 45999. For purposes of electing
portability, a Form 706 filed by Decedent's estate within 120 days from the date of this
letter will be considered to be timely filed.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

If it is later determined that, based on the value of the gross estate and taking into
account any taxable gifts, Decedent's estate is required to file an estate tax return
pursuant to § 6018(a), the Commissioner is without authority under § 301.9100-3 to
grant to Decedent's estate an extension of time to elect portability and the grant of the
extension referred to in this letter is deemed null and void.
PLR-115548-16                                 5

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that
it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative. Except as expressly provided herein, no
opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any
transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.


                                       Sincerely,


                                       Melissa C. Liquerman
                                       Melissa C. Liquerman
                                       Branch Chief, Branch 4
                                       Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Passthroughs & Special Industries)


Copy for § 6110 purposes


Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.