Private Letter Ruling 201638009 Released September 16, 2016 Approved

Partnership receives more time for section 754 election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partner died, and the partner's interest moved through the estate to a trust. The partnership's tax advisers neither explained the availability of an IRC § 754 election nor made the election on the return for the transfer year. The IRS granted 120 days to make the election effective for that year and later years. If limitations periods had closed, the partnership also had to adjust asset basis for depreciation that would have been allowable under § 743(b) had the election been timely.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the partnership make a late § 754 election following the transfer of a deceased partner's interest?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 120 days to make the election and required basis adjustments for closed years.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 743(b), 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b)(1), 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                       Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201638009                                              Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/16/2016                                        Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.15-00
                                                               Person To Contact:
-----------------------------------------------                -------------------, ID No. -----------------
--------------------------------                               Telephone Number:
-------------------------------                                ------- -------------
-------------------------------------------                    Refer Reply To:
                                                               CC:PSI:03
                                                               PLR-105597-16
                                                               Date:
                                                               June 13, 2016




X                 =         --------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
A                 =        ---------------------
Trust             =        ---------------------------------------------------------
State             =        ------
D1                =        --------------------------
D2                =        --------------------------

Dear ------------------:

      This responds to a letter dated February 4, 2016, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting an extension of time under
§ 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an election
under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

FACTS

        The information submitted states that X was an entity organized in State that was
classified as a partnership for US federal tax purposes. On D1, A, an owner of X, died.
A’s interest in X first flowed to A’s estate and later to Trust. This transfer of A’s interest
in X was an event for which X could have made an election under § 754 effective its
taxable year ending on D2. However, at that time, X’s tax advisors neither advised X of
the availability to make an election under § 754 nor made the election when preparing
the relevant tax return. Accordingly, X inadvertently failed to timely file a § 754 election
for the taxable year ending D2.

        X represents that it has acted reasonably and in good faith, that granting relief
will not prejudice the interests of the government, and that it is not using hindsight in
making the election.
PLR-105597-16                             2



LAW

       Section 743(b) provides, in pertinent part, that, in the case of a transfer of an
interest in a partnership by sale or exchange or upon the death of a partner, a
partnership, with respect to which an election provided in § 754 is in effect, will increase
the adjusted basis of the partnership property by the excess of the basis to the
transferee partner of his interest in the partnership over his proportionate share of the
adjusted basis of the partnership property, or decrease the adjusted basis of the
partnership property by the excess of the transferee partner’s proportionate share of the
adjusted basis of the partnership property over the basis of his interest in the
partnership. Section 743(b) further provides that such increase or decrease shall
constitute an adjustment to the basis of partnership property with respect to the
transferee partner only.

       Section 754 provides, in part, that if a partnership files an election, in accordance
with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of the partnership property is
adjusted, in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in
§ 743. Such an election shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the
partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year
with respect to which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.

        Section 1.754-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that an
election under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under 743(b) with
respect to a transfer of an interest in a partnership, shall be made in a written statement
filed with the partnership return for the taxable year during which the transfer occurs.
For the election to be valid, the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by
§ 1.6031-1(e) (including extensions thereof) for filing the return for the taxable year.

       Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory
election” as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the
Federal Register or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

       Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make the
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time
for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Under § 301.9100-3, a
request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including
PLR-105597-16                             3

affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and (2) the
grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.


CONCLUSION


       Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied.
As a result, X is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to
make an election under § 754 effective for its taxable year ending on D2 and thereafter.
A copy of this letter should be attached to the election.

        If the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund has
expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief and as a condition of this late
relief, X must adjust the basis of property to reflect any additional depreciation that
would have been allowable under § 743(b) if the § 754 election had been timely made.
Any depreciation deduction allowable for an open year, is to be computed based upon
the remaining useful life and using property basis as adjusted by the greater of any
depreciation deduction allowed or allowable in any prior year had the § 754 election
been timely made.

       Except as specifically set forth above, we express or imply no opinion concerning
the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of
the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder.

        This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. This ruling contained in
this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and
accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While
this office that not verified any of the material submitted in support of the ruling request,
it is subject to verification on examination.
PLR-105597-16                           4


      In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a
copy of this letter to X's authorized representative.


                                                Sincerely,



                                                Associate Chief Counsel
                                                (Passthroughs and Special Industries)



                                         By:    _______________
                                                Richard T. Probst
                                                Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
                                                Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                                (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2):
      Copy of this letter
      Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:


Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.