Short-week benefits remain subject to FICA tax
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel considered whether benefits paid when employees worked fewer than 36 hours or could not work because of weather were excluded from FICA wages. The workers receiving these short-week payments did not qualify for state unemployment compensation. Chief Counsel agreed that the payments failed Rev. Rul. 90-72's narrow exception because they were not linked to receipt of state unemployment compensation. The payments therefore remained wages for FICA purposes.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Are short-week benefits excluded from FICA wages as supplemental unemployment benefits?
- Outcome: Advice given, the benefits are not excluded from wages
- Key authorities: IRC § 3121; Rev. Rul. 90-72
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2016080909000907
UILC: 3121.00-00, 3121.01-11
Number: 201634023
Release Date: 8/19/2016
From:
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 9:00:09 AM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: -------------- POSTF-123534-16
Hi--------–
You asked whether “short-week” benefits paid to workers who work less than 36 hours in a week or who could not work due to weather are excluded from wages for purposes of FICA tax as supplemental unemployment benefits described in Revenue Ruling 90-
- You stated that under state law, an applicant for state unemployment compensation
benefits must be “unemployed, able, available for, and actively seeking suitable full-time work.” Recipients of short-week benefits do not qualify for state unemployment compensation. Thus, these short-week benefits are not “linked to the receipt of state unemployment compensation” as required by Revenue Ruling 90-72. We agree with your conclusion that these” short-week “ payments are not excluded from wages for purposes of FICA tax because they do not satisfy the narrow exception set forth in Rev. Rul. 90-72. Your conclusion is also consistent with PLRs 200322012 and 9734035, which stated Automatic Short Week Benefits are wages for FICA and FUTA purposes, unless the benefits are made to individuals who otherwise qualify for excludable Regular Benefits (i.e., if the Automatic Short Week Benefits immediately precede or follow a week in which an employee receives Regular Benefits).
Please let us know if you need anything else.
------
-----------------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace