Majority target interest is looked through for the investment-company test
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A publicly traded partnership proposed to receive interests in another publicly traded partnership in exchange for its own limited-partner interests. Immediately after the exchange, the acquiring partnership expected to own at least 50% by value of the target's equity. The IRS ruled that, if the 50% threshold was met, the target partnership interests would be disregarded for the IRC § 351(e) investment-company test. The acquiring partnership instead would be treated as owning its ratable share of the target's underlying assets.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How are majority-owned target-partnership interests treated for the IRC § 351(e) investment-company test?
- Outcome: Approved, subject to owning at least 50% by value immediately after the exchange
- Key authorities: IRC § 351(e)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201633028 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/12/2016 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 721.00-00, 351.13-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------- ---------------------------, ID No. --------------
-------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------- ----------------------
----------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------- CC:CORP:B06
PLR-138582-15
Date:
May 18, 2016
Legend
X = ----------------------------------------
GP1 = --------------------
-------------------------------------------------
------------------------
GP2 = -------------------------------------------
LP1 = --------------------------------------------
LP2 = ---------------------------------------------
LP3 = --------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLR-138582-15 2
Target MLP = ---------------------------------
New LP = ---------------------------------------
Business A = ------------------------------------------------------------------
a= ----
Dear ---------------------:
This letter responds to your November 25, 2015, letter requesting a significant issue
ruling with regard to a proposed transaction (the "Proposed Transaction"). The material
information submitted in that letter and subsequent correspondence is summarized
below.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon facts and representations submitted by
the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an
appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the materials submitted in support
of the request for ruling. Verification of the information, representations, and other data
may be required as part of the audit process.
This letter is issued pursuant to § 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2016-1, 2016-1 I.R.B. 1, 10,
regarding one or more significant issues under § 332, 351, 355, 368, or 1036. The
ruling contained in this letter only addresses one or more discrete legal issues involved
in the transaction. This office expresses no opinion in this letter as to the overall tax
consequences of the transaction described in this letter or as to any issue not
specifically addressed by the ruling below.
Summary of Facts
X is a publicly-traded limited partnership. GP1, a limited liability company, is X’s
general partner. X owns the general partner interest, incentive distribution rights
(“IDRs”), and a portion of the publicly traded limited partner interests in LP1.
Additionally, X owns a special class of LP1 partnership interests that track a percent of
the economic attributes of the general partner interest and IDRs of LP2, a limited
partnership.
PLR-138582-15 3
In addition to its ownership interests in LP2, LP1 also owns the general partner interest,
IDRs, and limited partner interests in LP3, a publicly traded limited partnership. LP1,
LP2 and LP3 are publicly traded partnerships within the meaning of §7704, and are
directly involved in Business A.
Proposed Transaction
X has been engaged in acquisition discussions with GP2, the corporate general partner
of Target MLP, an unrelated publicly traded limited partnership engaged in Business A.
X proposes, in part, to undertake the following transaction:
(i) The members of GP1 will form a new limited partnership (“New LP”), which will
elect to be taxed as a corporation for federal income tax purposes.
(ii) GP2 will merge into New LP with New LP surviving the merger.
(iii) New LP will contribute its newly acquired interests in Target MLP to X in
exchange for limited partner interests of X (the “Exchange”).
Representations
X makes the following representations:
(a) Immediately after the Exchange, the total value of X’s direct ownership interests
in Target MLP will be more than 50 percent of the total value of all equity
interests outstanding in Target MLP.
(b) At the time of the Exchange, there will be no plan in existence pursuant to which
the total value of X’s direct ownership interests in Target MLP will become less
than 50 percent of the total value of all equity interests outstanding in Target
MLP.
Ruling
Based solely on the information submitted and representations set forth above, we rule
as follows:
Provided that immediately after the Exchange, X’s direct ownership interests in Target
MLP will represent 50 percent or more of the total value of all Target MLP equity
interests, X’s Target MLP equity interests will be disregarded and X will be deemed to
own its ratable share of Target MLP’s assets for purposes of determining whether X is
an investment company under § 351(e).
PLR-138582-15 4
Caveats
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax treatment of the Proposed Transaction under other provisions of the Code or
regulations or the tax treatment of any condition existing at the time of, or effects
resulting from, the Proposed Transaction that is not specifically covered by the above
ruling. In particular, no opinion is expressed on (i) the merger described in step (ii)
above, (ii) whether X’s ownership interests in Target MLP will represent 50 percent or
more of the total value of all Target MLP equity interests immediately after the
Exchange, and (iii) whether a plan exists at the time of the Exchange pursuant to which
X’s direct ownership interests in Target MLP will represent less than 50 percent of the
total value of all of Target MLP’s equity interests.
Procedural Statements
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that this letter may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any federal information and income tax return
to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may
satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date
and control number of the letter ruling.
In accordance with the powers of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
_Richard K. Passales__
Richard K. Passales
Senior Counsel, Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.