Restructuring steps do not disqualify subsidiary liquidations

Plain-English summary

A public company planned to separate one business, distribute a controlled corporation, and combine that corporation with an unrelated public company. Before the separation, several corporate subsidiaries would convert to disregarded limited liability companies in transactions treated as liquidations. Some assets deemed distributed in those liquidations would then move through additional corporations or into the separated business. Based on a representation limiting certain follow-on transfers to no more than 30 percent of each converting entity's gross asset value, the IRS ruled that the later transfers, contribution, distribution, and merger would not prevent the liquidations from qualifying under IRC § 332.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Will the later restructuring steps prevent the subsidiary conversions from qualifying as complete liquidations under IRC § 332?
• Outcome: Approved
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 332, 355, 361, and 368

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201633014 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/12/2016 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 355.00-00, 332.00-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------- --------------------------, ID No. ----------------
------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------
------------ Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------- CC:CORP:BO1
In Re: PLR-112617-16
---------------------------------------- Date:
May 09, 2016

Distributing = -----------------------------------------

Controlled = ---------------------------------------------

Transferred
Business = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sub A = -------------------------------------------

Sub B = -------------------------------------------------------

Sub C = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------

Sub D = ----------------

PLR-112617-16 2

Sub E = -------------------------------------------------------------------

Sub F = ---------------------------------------------------------------

Sub G = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------

Sub H = ---------------------------------------------------------

Sub I = ---------------------------------------------------------

F Company = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Merger Partner = ------------------------------

Merger Sub = -----------------------

State L = --------------

State M = ---------------

State N = --------------

State O = -----------

State P = ---------
PLR-112617-16 3

Country Y = -------------------

Date 1 = ------------------------

Date 2 = ------------------------

v = --------------

w = ------

Dear --------------------

  This letter responds to your authorized representatives' letter dated April 8, 2016,

requesting a ruling on certain federal income tax consequences of a proposed
transaction (the “Proposed Transaction”). The information submitted in that request is
summarized below.

    The ruling contained in this letter is based on facts and representations submitted

by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an
appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the materials submitted in support
of the request for rulings. Verification of the information, representations, and other
data may be required as part of the audit process.

   This letter and the ruling contained herein is issued pursuant to section 6.03 of

Rev. Proc. 2016-1, 2016-1 I.R.B. 1, 19, regarding one or more significant issues under
sections 332 and 368, and only address one or more discrete legal issues involved in
the transaction. This Office expresses no opinion as to the overall tax consequences of
the Proposed Transaction described in this letter or as to any issue not specifically
addressed by the ruling below.

                                 Summary of Facts

    Distributing is a State L corporation and is the parent of a worldwide group of

entities (the “Distributing Worldwide Group”). Distributing is also a widely held public
company that is the common parent of an affiliated group that files a consolidated
federal income tax return (the “Distributing Group”). The Distributing Group is engaged
in several lines of business, including the Transferred Business.

   Distributing wholly owns the stock of Controlled, Sub A, Sub B, Sub C, and Sub

D, each of which is a State M corporation; Sub E, which is a State N corporation; Sub F,
which is a State O corporation, and Sub G, which is a State P corporation. Sub A, in
turn, wholly owns Sub H and Sub I, each of which is a State M corporation. Sub B
wholly owns F Company, a Country Y limited company.
PLR-112617-16 4

     Merger Partner, a State M corporation unrelated to the Distributing Worldwide

Group, is a widely held public company that is the common parent of an affiliated group
that files a consolidated federal income tax return. Merger Partner wholly owns Merger
Sub, a State M corporation which was formed for the sole purpose of facilitating the
Proposed Transaction.

   On Date 2, Distributing, Controlled, Merger Partner, and Merger Sub entered into

a merger agreement (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”) and various other
agreements governing certain terms of the Proposed Transaction. On the same date,
Distributing and Controlled entered into a separation agreement (the “Separation
Agreement”) governing certain terms of the Proposed Transaction.

   Each of Sub A, Sub B, Sub C, Sub E, Sub F, Sub H, and Sub I (the “Commingled

Entities”) has assets and conducts activities relating to both the Transferred Business
and Distributing’s other businesses. Sub D, Sub G, and F Company conduct activities
relating solely to the Transferred Business.

                              Proposed Transaction

  Distributing is entering into the Proposed Transaction in order to separate the

Transferred Business from its other businesses and to facilitate the transactions
contemplated in the Merger Agreement. The relevant steps of the Proposed
Transaction are set forth below:

(i) On Date 1, Distributing formed Controlled.

(ii) Each of Sub A, Sub B, Sub C, Sub D, Sub E, Sub F, Sub G, Sub H, and
Sub I (collectively known as the “Converting Entities”) will convert from a
corporation to a limited liability company (“LLC”) under the respective state law
applicable to each corporation. Each of these LLCs will be treated as an entity
disregarded from its owner for federal tax purposes. All of the LLCs except the
LLC resulting from the conversion of Sub D (the “Sub D LLC”) and the LLC
resulting from the conversion of Sub G (the “Sub G LLC”) are referred to as the
“Retained LLCs.” The Distributing Group will treat all of these conversions as
liquidations of the corporations for federal tax purposes (the “Liquidations’).

(iii) Distributing and/or Controlled expect to transfer, or cause to be
transferred, certain assets deemed distributed in the Liquidations
(including assets actually distributed to Distributing by the Retained LLCs
following the Liquidations) to one or more entities (other than Distributing
or Controlled) classified as corporations for U.S. federal income tax
purposes (each corporation, a “Recipient Corporation,” and the
transfers, the “Recipient Corporation Transfers”), including a Recipient
Corporation all of the equity of which will be contributed to Controlled in
the Contribution (as defined below).
PLR-112617-16 5

(iv) Distributing will, and will cause each of the Retained LLCs to, transfer any of its
assets relating to the Transferred Business (including all of the interests in Sub D
LLC, Sub G LLC, F Company, and certain other entities) to Controlled (the
“Contribution”) in exchange for (A) Controlled common stock, (B) the
assumption of any liabilities relating to the Transferred Business, and (C) a
cash payment (the “Special Cash Payment”) currently intended to be
approximately $v, subject to certain adjustments in the Merger Agreement and
the Separation Agreement, which Distributing expects to distribute in a
transaction governed by Section 361.

(v) Distributing will either (i) distribute, on a pro rata basis, all of the Controlled
shares to Distributing’s shareholders, or (ii) pursuant to an exchange offer,
exchange all of the Controlled shares for shares of Distributing and, if the
exchange offer is undersubscribed, distribute any remaining shares of
Controlled pro rata to Distributing’s shareholders (the “Distribution”).

(vi) Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into
Controlled, with Controlled surviving and becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of
Merger Partner (the “Merger”). In the Merger, each share of Controlled common
stock will be converted into the right to receive one share of Merger Partner
common stock. Immediately after the consummation of the Merger,
approximately w percent (more than 50 percent) of the outstanding shares of
Merger Partner common stock is expected to be held by shareholders who held
Distributing stock prior to the Distribution.

                                   Representation

   Distributing represents that there is no plan or intention by Distributing or

Controlled to transfer in the Recipient Corporation Transfers more than 30 percent of
the total fair market value of the respective gross assets of any Converting Entity
immediately before its Liquidation to a Recipient Corporation.

                                        Ruling

   Based solely on the information submitted and the representation set forth

above, we rule that the Recipient Corporation Transfers (described in Step (iii)), the
Contribution (described in Step (iv)), the Distribution (described in Step (v)), and the
Merger (described in Step (vi)) will not preclude the Liquidations (described in Step (ii))
from qualifying as complete liquidations within the meaning of section 332.

                                       Caveats

  Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax treatment of the Proposed Transaction under any provision of the
Code and regulations or the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or
PLR-112617-16 6

effects resulting from, the Proposed Transaction that are not specifically covered by the
above ruling.

                             Procedural Statements

  This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer[s] who requested it. Section

6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

   A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is

relevant. Alternatively, a taxpayer filing its return electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to the return that provides the date and control
number of this letter ruling.

   In accordance with the power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter

ruling will be sent to two of your authorized representatives.

                                               Sincerely,



                                               ____________________________
                                               Mark J. Weiss
                                               Chief, Branch 2
                                               Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                               (Corporate)