Private Letter Ruling 201630013 Released July 22, 2016 Approved

Foreign partnership receives late section 754 election relief

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A foreign entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal tax purposes failed to file an intended IRC § 754 election after ownership interests were transferred. It nevertheless adjusted partnership property basis as though the election were in effect and did not take an inconsistent position. The partnership represented that it acted reasonably and in good faith, was not using hindsight, and that relief would not prejudice the government. The IRS granted 120 days to make the election effective for the affected year and later years under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. The ruling did not decide whether the entity was substantively a partnership for federal tax purposes.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the foreign partnership receive additional time to make a section 754 election after applying the related basis adjustments consistently?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 120 days from the ruling date to file
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 743 and 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b)(1), 1.6031(a)-1(b)(5), and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201630013 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/22/2016 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.15-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------- -------------------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------- ------- -------------
-------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------- CC:PSI:03
PLR-135647-15
Date:
April 22, 2016

X = ----------------------------

Country = ---------------
D1 = ----------------------

Dear -----------------:

  This responds to a letter dated October 26, 2015, submitted on behalf of X,

requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to file an election under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code).

FACTS

   The information submitted states that X was an entity formed under the laws of

Country and was classified as a partnership for US federal income tax purposes for its
taxable year ending D1. Interests in X were transferred during the taxable year ending
on D1. X intended to file an election under § 754 for that year, but failed to do so. X,
however, adjusted the basis of partnership property as if there were a § 754 election in
effect and did not take any position inconsistent with such an election.

    X represents that it has acted reasonably and in good faith, that granting relief

will not prejudice the interests of the government, and that it is not using hindsight in
making the election.

LAW

     Section 754 provides, in part, that if a partnership files an election, in accordance

PLR-135647-15 2

with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of the partnership property is
adjusted, in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in
§ 743. Such an election shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the
partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year
with respect to which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.

    Section 1.754-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that an

election under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under 743(b) with
respect to a transfer of an interest in a partnership, shall be made in a written statement
filed with the partnership return for the taxable year during which the transfer occurs.
For the election to be valid, the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by
§ 1.6031-1(e) (including extensions thereof) for filing the return for the taxable year.

     Section 1.6031(a)-1(b)(5) provides that, for a partnership not otherwise required

to file a partnership return, if an election that only the partnership may make is required
to be made by or for the partnership, a return on the form prescribed for the partnership
return must be filed for the partnership.

   Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable

extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory
election” as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the
Federal Register or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make the
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time
for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Under § 301.9100-3, a
request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including
affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and (2) the
grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

CONCLUSION

   Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we

conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied.
As a result, X is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to
make an election under § 754 effective for its taxable year ending on D1 and thereafter.
A copy of this letter should be attached to the election.

PLR-135647-15 3

   Except as specifically set forth above, we express or imply no opinion concerning

the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of
the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder. Specifically, we express or
imply no opinion as to whether X is a partnership for federal tax purposes.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the

Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

   This ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations

submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office that not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

  In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a

copy of this letter to X's authorized representative.

                                             Sincerely,


                                             Associate Chief Counsel
                                             (Passthroughs and Special Industries)


                                      By:    _______________
                                             Holly Porter
                                             Chief, Branch 3
                                             Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                             (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.