Private Letter Ruling 201629004 Released July 15, 2016 Approved

Investment fund receives more time to make foreign-tax election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A regulated investment company intended to elect under IRC § 853 so its shareholders would be treated as paying their shares of foreign taxes withheld from the fund's dividends. Its adviser resigned as auditor because of an independence restriction and inadvertently failed to prepare the extension for the fund's return. The fund's manager overlooked the missed filing while arranging a replacement audit, so the return and election were late. The IRS found that the fund acted reasonably and in good faith and granted 90 days to make the election. The ruling addressed only timeliness and did not decide whether the fund otherwise qualified as a regulated investment company.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the fund receive more time to make its § 853 election after its adviser and manager missed the return-extension filing?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 90 days from the ruling date to make the election
  • Key authorities: IRC § 853; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.853-4, 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                       Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201629004                                              Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/15/2016                                        Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 853.01-00
                                                               Person To Contact:
------------------------------------                           -----------------------, ID No. -------------------
-----------------------------------------------------          ---------------------------------------------------
------------------------                                       Telephone Number:
-----------------------------                                  ----------------------
-----------------------------------------                      Refer Reply To:
                                                               CC:FIP:B02
                                                               PLR-135809-15
                                                               Date:
                                                               March 31, 2016




Legend:

Fund              =         ------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------

State             =        --------------

Date 1            =        ------------------------

Date 2            =        ----------------------

Date 3            =        --------------------------

Month             =        -------------

Country           =        ---------

Advisor           =        ---------------------

Date 4            =        -------------------

Date 5            =        --------------------

Date 6            =        ------------------
PLR-135809-15                                2

Dear ----------------:

       This is in reply to a letter dated October 29, 2015, and subsequent
correspondence, requesting an extension of time for Fund to file an election under
section 853(a) of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to certain foreign taxes that
were paid by Fund.

                                         FACTS

       Fund is a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company. It is
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq., as
amended. It was incorporated under the laws of State on Date 1 and began operating
on Date 2. It has elected to be taxed as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under
subchapter M of the Code. Fund’s overall method of accounting is the accrual method,
and its taxable year is a fiscal year ending on the final day of Month.

       A significant part of Fund’s investment strategy is investing in equities traded on
foreign markets. It seeks long-term capital appreciation primarily through investments in
smaller capitalization companies in Country, a foreign jurisdiction. Fund is subject to
foreign withholding tax on certain dividends it receives from its investment in foreign
securities. For its fiscal year ended Date 3, Fund met the requirements of section
853(a) of the Code. Foreign taxes described in section 901(b) of the Code were
withheld from dividends received by Fund. Fund intended to file the election in section
853(a) to have its shareholders treated as if they had paid their share of the foreign
taxes paid by Fund, and stated that intention in its annual report of Date 4.

       Fund engaged Advisor to audit its financial statements and provide other
services. These other services included the preparation of Fund’s Form 1120-RIC, U.S.
Income Tax Return for Regulated Investment Companies, for its fiscal year ended Date
3, and Form 7004, Application for Automatic Extension of Time to file Certain Business
Income Tax, Information, and Other Returns for that fiscal year. Advisor coordinates its
services with Fund’s manager.

       On Date 5 Advisor learned that it was covered by an independence restriction
arising under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Rules and Regulations and
was therefore unable to provide audit services to Fund, and resigned as auditor.
Advisor inadvertently failed to prepare Form 7004 to extend the time to file Fund’s 1120-
RIC. Fund’s manager inadvertently overlooked the failure to file Form 7004 because
the manager was focused on the need to appoint another auditor and to complete an
audit for Fund for the fiscal year ended Date 3 under significant time constraints. As a
result of the failure to file a timely Form 7004, Fund did not file a timely Form 1120-RIC
and did not make a timely election under section 853(a).
PLR-135809-15                                  3

       On Date 6 Advisor discovered that Fund had not filed a timely Form 7004 and
that no timely election under section 853(a) had been made. Fund’s manager also
discovered the failure to file Form 7004 in consultations with Fund’s assistant manager.
Advisor advised the manager to request an extension of time to file Fund’s 110-RIC.

      The following representations are made in connection with the request for an
extension of time:

1. The request for relief was filed before the failure to make the regulatory election was
discovered by the Internal Revenue Service.

2. Granting the relief requested will not result in Fund having a lower tax liability in the
aggregate for all years to which the election applies than it would have had if the
election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).

3. Fund does not seek to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty
has been or could have been imposed under section 6662 of the Code at the time it
requested relief, and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which
relief is requested.

4. Being fully informed of the required regulatory election and related tax
consequences, Fund did not choose to not file the election.

5. Fund is not using hindsight in making the decision to seek the relief requested. No
specific facts have changed since the due date for making the election that make the
election advantageous to the taxpayer.

       In addition, affidavits on behalf of Fund have been provided as required by
section 301.9100-3(e) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.

                                   LAW AND ANALYSIS

       Section 853(a) of the Code provides that a RIC that meets the requirements of
section 853(a)(1) and (2) may make an election with respect to certain foreign taxes
paid by the RIC during the taxable year to foreign countries and possessions of the
United States. Under section 853(b)(2)(A), if this election is effective for a taxable year,
each shareholder of the RIC shall include in gross income and treat as paid by him his
proportionate share of such taxes.

       Under section 1.853-4(a) of the Income Tax Regulations, to make an election
under section 853 for a taxable year, a RIC must file a statement of election as part of
its Federal income tax return for the taxable year. Section 1.853-4(b) provides that this
election must be made no later than the time prescribed for filing the return (including
extensions).
PLR-135809-15                                 4


       Section 301.9100-1(c) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides
that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a
regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the
case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code
except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory election as
an election whose due date is prescribed by regulations or by a revenue ruling, revenue
procedure, notice, or announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

        Section 301.9100-3(a) through (c)(1) sets forth rules that the Service generally
will use to determine whether, under the particular facts and circumstances of each
situation, the Commissioner will grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that
do not meet the requirements of section 301.9100-2. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides
that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides
the evidence (including affidavits described in section 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith,
and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

         Section 301.9100-3(b) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer (i) requests relief under this section before
the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the Service; (ii) failed to
make the election because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer’s control; (iii)
failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence (taking into
account the taxpayer’s experience and the complexity of the return or issue), the
taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election; (iv) reasonably relied on the
written advice of the Service; or (v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional,
including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to
make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election. Moreover, a taxpayer will be
deemed not to have acted in good faith if the taxpayer (i) seeks to alter a return position
for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under section
6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief and the new position requires or permits a
regulatory election for which relief is requested; (ii) was informed in all material respects
of the required election and related tax consequences, but chose not to file the election;
or (iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief.

       Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that a reasonable extension of time to make a
regulatory election will be granted only when the interests of the government will not be
prejudiced by the granting of relief. Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the
interests of the government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer
having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election
than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into
account the time value of money). Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides that the
interests of the government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the
regulatory election should have been made or any taxable years that would have been
PLR-135809-15                                   5

affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the period of limitations
on assessment under section 6501(a) before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting
relief under this section.

                                       CONCLUSION

       Based upon the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that Fund has
shown good cause for granting a reasonable extension of time to make the election
under section 853(a). The extension of time to make this election is 90 days from the
date of this letter.

       This ruling is limited to the timeliness of the filing of the election in section 853(a)
of the Code. This ruling’s application is limited to the facts, representations, Code
sections, and regulations cited herein. No opinion is expressed with regard to whether
Fund otherwise qualifies as a RIC under subchapter M of the Code.

       No opinion is expressed with regard to whether the tax liability of Fund is not
lower in the aggregate for all years to which the election applies than such tax liability
would have been if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time
value of money). Upon audit of the federal income tax returns involved, the director’s
office will determine such tax liability for the years involved. If the director’s office
determines that such tax liability is lower, that office will determine the federal income
tax effect.

      Except as specifically provided otherwise, no opinion is expressed on the federal
income tax consequences of the transactions described above.

       This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

        In accordance with the terms of a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of
this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

                                            Sincerely,


                                            Susan Thompson Baker
                                            Susan Thompson Baker
                                            Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 2
                                            Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                            (Financial Institutions and Products)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.