Determination Letter 201628022 Released July 8, 2016 Approved Transcribed from scan

IRS approves set-aside for water-quality education facility

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A private foundation asked to set aside funds to construct a larger facility for two water-quality and science education programs. The planned building would include chemistry and biology teaching laboratories where children could conduct hands-on water evaluations and adults could receive water-quality analysis. The foundation proposed paying construction companies as milestones were completed instead of paying the entire cost immediately. The IRS concluded that the project could be better accomplished through a set-aside and approved it under IRC § 4942(g)(2). The funds had to be paid within 60 months after the first set-aside, with any unused amount redirected to other educational buildings completed within that period.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the foundation treat funds reserved for a water-quality education facility as a qualifying set-aside?
  • Outcome: Approved, with the amount required to be paid within the statutory 60-month period
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 170(c)(2)(B) and 4942(g)(2); Treas. Reg. § 53.4942(a)-3(b); Rev. Rul. 74-450

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Employer Identification Number:

Date: April 13, 2016
Contact Person - ID Number:

Number: 201628022

Release Date: 7/8/2016 Contact Telephone Number:
LEGEND:                                      UIL:
                                             4942.03-07
P = Facility
Q = Program Name
R = Program Name
S = County/State
T = Name
U = Name

x dollars = Amount
y= Number

Dear

Why you are receiving this letter

This is our response to your October 30, 2015 letter requesting approval of a set-
aside under Internal Revenue Code section 4942(g)(2). You’ve been recognized

as tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Code and have been determined to
be a private foundation under section 509(a).

Our determination

Based on the information furnished, your set-aside program is approved under
Internal Revenue Code section 4942(g)(2). As required under section 4942(g)(2),
the set aside amount must be paid within the 60-month period after the date of the
first set-aside.

Description of set-aside request

You have requested a set-aside of x dollars for the tax year ending December 31,

, to fund the Project. The nature of the Project is to build a P to operate the Q
to provide hands-on education experiences to local children and to operate the R
to provide water quality analysis for adults. Both programs have been recognized
as leading water quality and science education programs. These programs have
operated out of a very restrictive facility as an outreach to various participating


schools. The current P is no longer a feasible location to perform water testing
with student involvement because it is physically too small and all class interaction
must take place on a deck which does not work well if it rains.

The new P will provide a proper chemistry teaching lab and biology teaching lab.
Each lab will accommodate several students plus instructors. You were recently
able to obtain a site adjacent to the T facility near U River and crossed by two
flowing creeks. The new facility will allow students to visit the P and engage in
hands-on water quality evaluations. The building for the new P will be y square
feet and will be built in S. The amount to be set aside to build the P is x dollars in
2015. There are no amounts to be added after the initial amount is set aside.

The set-aside total amount will be distributed to construction companies as they
reach milestones and complete the construction of the P. The project can be better
accomplished by a set-aside than by an immediate payment of funds because It
would not be prudent to pay the construction contractors the total amount prior to
the completion of the entire job, because the standard practice is to pay for
construction activities as each milestone toward completion is finished. Further,
the set-aside approach will allow you to maximize control over the project, with the
goal of achieving a better result.

The set-aside amount should be fully distributed in 2016 but in no case no later
than 60 months after the total amount is set-aside. If P is blocked for some
unforeseen reason, you will distribute the total amount set-aside on other
education buildings that will be built within 60 months.

Basis for our determination

Internal Revenue Code section 4942(g)(2)(A) states that an amount set aside for a
specific project, which includes one or more purposes described in section
170(c)(2)(B), may be treated as a qualifying distribution if it meets the
requirements of section 4942(g)(2)(B).

Section 4942(g)(2)(B) of the Code states that an amount set aside for a specific
project will meet the requirements of this subparagraph if, at the time of the set-
aside, the foundation establishes that the amount will be paid within five years and
either clause (i) or (ii) are satisfied.

Section 4942(g)(2)(B)(i) of the Code is satisfied if, at the time of the set-aside, the
private foundation establishes that the project can better be accomplished using
the set-aside than by making an immediate payment.

Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(1) of the Foundations and Similar Excise Taxes
Regulations provides that a private foundation may establish a project as better
accomplished by a set-aside than by immediate payment if the set-aside satisfies
the suitability test described in section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2).

Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2) of the Foundations and Similar Excise Taxes
Regulations provides that specific projects better accomplished using a set-aside
include, but are not limited to, projects where relatively long-term expenditures
must be made requiring more than one year’s income to assure their continuity.

In Revenue Ruling 74-450, 1974-2 C.B. 388, an operating foundation converted a
portion of newly acquired land into a public park under a four-year construction
contract. The construction contract payments were to be made mainly during the
final two years. This constituted a “specific project.” The foundation’s set-aside of
all its excess earnings for four years was treated as a qualifying distribution under
Internal Revenue Code section 4942(g)(2).

What you must do

Your approved set-aside(s) will be documented on your records as pledges or
obligations to be paid by the date specified. The amounts set aside will be taken
into account to determine your minimum investment return under Internal Revenue
Code section 4942(e)(1)(A), and the income attributable to your set aside(s) will
also be taken into account in computing your adjusted net income under section
4942(f) of the Code.

Additional information

This determination is directed only to the organization that requested it. Internal
Revenue Code section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as a
precedent.

Please keep a copy of this letter in your records.

If you have any questions, please contact the person listed in the heading of this
letter.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey I. Cooper
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Enclosure

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.