Private Letter Ruling 201626020 Released June 24, 2016 Approved

Couple receives 120 days to opt out of automatic GST allocations

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer created an irrevocable trust for a spouse and four children, then later made cash gifts that the spouses elected to split for gift tax purposes. Their tax professionals prepared the gift tax returns but failed to elect out of the automatic allocation of generation-skipping transfer exemption. The spouses represented that no taxable distribution, taxable termination, or other event producing GST tax had occurred. The IRS found the regulatory-relief requirements satisfied and gave them 120 days to file supplemental Forms 709 electing out for the prior gifts and future gifts to the trust. The ruling relied on their reasonable use of qualified tax professionals and concluded that relief would not prejudice the government.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the spouses receive more time to elect out of automatic GST exemption allocations to their trust?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 120 days to file supplemental Forms 709
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2513, 2632(c), and 2642(g); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                       Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201626020                                              Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/24/2016                                        Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2632.00-00, 9100.00-00
                                                               Person To Contact:
---------------------------                                    ------------------------------, ID No. ------------
----------------------------                                   ----------------
--------------------------------------------------             Telephone Number:
-----------------------------------                            --------------------
------------------------                                       Refer Reply To:
                                                               CC:PSI:B04
In Re: --------------------                                    PLR-139704-15
                                                               Date:
                                                               March 15, 2016


Legend:

Taxpayer                       =      ---------------------------
Spouse                         =      ----------------------------
Trust                          =      -----------------------------------------------------
Date 1                         =      ---------------------
Date 2                         =      ---------------------
Year 3                         =      ---------------------

Dear -----------------------------:

      This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter of
October 23, 2015, and subsequent correspondence, requesting an extension of time
under § 2642 of the Internal Revenue Code and §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to elect out of the deemed allocation of
generation-skipping transfer (GST) exemption to transfers to a trust.

     The facts, as represented, are as follows. On Date 1, a date before
December 31, 2000, Taxpayer created Trust, an irrevocable trust for the benefit of
Spouse and Taxpayer’s four children. Trust has GST tax potential.

        On Date 2 and Date 3, dates after December 31, 2000, Taxpayer made cash
gifts to Trust. Taxpayer and Spouse retained tax professionals to prepare the Forms
709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Returns, reporting the
Date 2 and Date 3 gifts to Trust. On these returns Taxpayer and Spouse elected to
treat gifts made by either as made by both under § 2513. On the returns the tax
professionals, however, failed to elect out of the deemed allocation of GST exemption
by § 2632(c)(5).

      Taxpayer and Spouse represent that, to date, no taxable distributions, taxable
terminations, or any other events have occurred with respect to Trust that would give

PLR-139704-15                                2

rise to a GST tax liability.

       Taxpayer and Spouse request an extension of time to elect out of the deemed
allocation of GST exemption under § 2632(c) to the gifts Taxpayer made to Trust on
Date 2 and Date 3 and any future gifts made to Trust.

Law and Analysis:

        Section 2513(a) provides generally that, for gift tax purposes, if the parties’
consent, a gift made by one spouse to any person other than his or her spouse shall, for
gift tax purposes, be considered as made one-half by the donor spouse and one-half by
his or her spouse.

        Section 2601 imposes a tax on every GST. A GST is defined under § 2611(a) as
(1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

       Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax imposed by § 2601 is the
taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate.

       Section 2641(a) defines the applicable rate as the product of the maximum
federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer. Under
§ 2642(a), the inclusion ratio with respect to any property transferred in a GST is the
excess (if any) of 1 over the applicable fraction. The applicable fraction, as defined in
§ 2642(a)(2), is a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of the GST exemption
under § 2631 allocated to the trust (or to property transferred in a direct skip), and the
denominator of which is the value of the property transferred to the trust or involved in
the direct skip.

      Section 2631(a) in effect on the dates in question, provides that for purposes of
determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption
amount of $1,000,000 which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to
any property with respect to which such individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b)
provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.

      Section 2631(c) provides that, for purposes of § 2631(a), the GST exemption
amount for any calendar year shall be equal to the basic exclusion amount under
§ 2010(c) for such calendar year.

       Section 2632(c)(3)(A) provides that for purposes of § 2632(c), the term “indirect
skip” means any transfer of property (other than a direct skip) subject to the tax imposed
by chapter 12 made to a GST trust, as defined in § 2632(c)(3)(B).

       Section 2632(c)(5)(A)(i) provides that an individual may elect to have § 2632(c) not
apply to (I) an indirect skip or (II) any or all transfers made by such individual to a

PLR-139704-15                                 3

particular trust.

       Section 2632(c)(5)(b)(i) provides that an election under § 2632(c)(5)((A)(i)(I) shall
be deemed to be timely if filed on a timely filed gift tax return for the calendar year in
which the transfer was made or deemed to have been made pursuant to § 2632(c)(4) or
on such later date or dates as may be prescribed by the Secretary.

     Section 2632(c)(5)(B)(ii) provides that an election under § 2632(c)(5)(A)(i)(II) may
be made on a timely filed gift tax return for the calendar year for which the election is to
become effective.

       Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe
such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to
make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election
under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting
comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of
this paragraph.

       Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under
§ 2642(g)(1), the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including
evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such
other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to
grant relief, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be treated as if not
expressly prescribed by statute.

       Section 2652(a)(2) provides that, if, under § 2513, one-half of a gift is treated as
made by an individual and one-half of such gift is treated as made by the spouse of
such individual, such gift shall be so treated for purposes of chapter 13.

        Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time
for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for
electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust
as a GST trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice
further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation
described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5)
under the provisions of § 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3.

       Sections 301.9100 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
301.9100-1(a).

       Section 9100-2 provides an automatic extension of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant
an extension of time to make an election whose date is prescribed by a regulation (and not

PLR-139704-15                                 4

expressly provided by statute). In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50,
taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1)
or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of
§ 301.9100-3.

        Section 301.9100-3(a) provides, in part, that requests for relief subject to
§ 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to
the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

       Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides, in part, that a taxpayer is deemed to have
acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

       Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the
requirements of § 301.9100-3 are satisfied. Therefore, Taxpayer and Spouse are
granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to elect out of the
deemed allocation of GST exemption under § 2632(c) for the gifts to Trust on Date 2
and Date 3 and any future gifts made to Trust.

      The elections should be made on Supplemental Forms 709 for the years in which
the Date 2 and Date 3 gifts occurred and filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center
Cincinnati Service Center - Stop 82, Cincinnati, OH 45999, for association with the
Form 709. You should attach a copy of this letter to the Supplemental Forms 709.

      In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with the office, we have sent a
copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.

      The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

       Except as specifically ruled herein, we express no opinion on the federal tax
consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions or under any other
provisions of the Code.

PLR-139704-15                               5

      This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                     Sincerely,

                                     Melissa C. Liquerman

                                     Melissa C. Liquerman
                                     Chief, Branch 4
                                     Associate Chief Counsel
                                     (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures: Copy for § 6110 purposes


cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.