Partnership-interest transfers avoided investment-company treatment
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Owners of several operating partnerships planned to transfer their partnership interests to a newly formed company in exchange for shares, with some owners receiving cash. The company also planned a private offering, a merger with a related S corporation, and an election to be taxed as a real estate investment trust. The taxpayers asked only whether the partnership-interest transfers for shares would be treated as transfers to an investment company. The IRS ruled that they would not fall within the investment-company exception in IRC § 351(e). It expressly declined to rule on the broader transaction or whether the entities would qualify as a REIT.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Would transferring the partnership interests to the new company for its shares be treated as a transfer to an investment company?
- Outcome: Approved, the § 351(e) investment-company exception did not apply
- Key authorities: IRC § 351(e); Rev. Proc. 2015-1
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201622014 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/27/2016 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 351.13-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------- -----------------------, ID No. ------------
------------------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------------ ------------------
---------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------------------- CC:CORP:B05
PLR-129823-15
Date:
February 23, 2016
Taxpayers = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P1 = -------------------------------------------
P2 = --------------------------------------------------
P3 = -----------------------------------------------
AssetsX = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
AssetsY = ----------------------------------------------
AssetsZ = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
BOP1 = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
BOP2 = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOP3 = --------------------------------------
BOP4 = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
CY = -----------------------------------
StateX = ------------
PLR-129823-15 2
CZ = ------------------------------
ServicesX = ---------------------------------------------------------------------
TaxpayerX = --------------------------------
Date1 = --------------------------
Year1 = ------
Dear ----------------:
This is in response to the letter dated September 3, 2015, requesting a ruling on a
significant issue presented under section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code (the
“Code”). The information provided in that request and in subsequent correspondence is
summarized below.
This letter is issued pursuant to section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2015-1, 2015-1 I.R.B. 1,
regarding one or more significant issues under sections 332, 351, 355, 368, or 1036 of
the Code. The ruling contained in this letter only addresses one discrete legal issue
involved in the transactions described in this letter. This Office expresses no opinion as
to the overall tax consequences of these transactions or as to any issue not specifically
addressed by the ruling below.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayers and accompanied by “penalties of perjury” statements
executed by an appropriate party. This Office has not verified any of the materials
submitted in support of the ruling request. Verification of the facts, representations, and
other information may be required as part of the audit process.
FACTS
Taxpayers are limited liability companies (LLCs) that are treated as partnerships for
federal income tax purposes. Taxpayers and other persons own interests in LLCs that
are each treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes: P1, P2, and P3
(collectively, “the Partnerships”).
The significant assets of the Partnerships consist of: (i) AssetsX, (ii) AssetsY, and (iii)
AssetsZ.
The business operations of the Partnerships consist of: (i) BOP1, (ii) BOP2, (iii) BOP3,
and (iv) BOP4.
PLR-129823-15 3
The Partnerships own all of their assets and conduct their business operations directly
or through wholly-owned LLCs, with the exception that P2 conducts its BOP2 and BOP3
through its wholly owned subsidiary, CY, a StateX LLC which has elected to be taxed as
a corporation for federal income tax purposes.
CZ, a StateX corporation that has elected to be taxed as a subchapter S corporation for
federal income tax purposes, provides ServicesX for the Partnerships.
Taxpayers intend to engage in a series of transactions that will include the following
steps.
(a) TaxpayerX will form a StateX LLC (the “Company”). The Company will elect to be
taxed as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. The Company also will elect to
be taxed as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes commencing
with its taxable year ending on Date1.
(b) On a date to be determined in Year1, the following events will occur simultaneously:
(i) One or more private institutional investors will contribute cash to the
Company in exchange for stock in the Company (“Shares”). The
proceeds from that private offering will be applied to pay transaction
expenses, purchase interests in the Partnerships from owners who elect
to receive cash rather than Shares in the exchange (described in (ii)
below), and possibly to acquire additional AssetsY (having a similar risk
profile as those in the Partnerships) and establish reserves for working
capital.
(ii) The owners of interests in the Partnerships will transfer their interests
in the Partnerships to the Company in exchange for Shares and/or cash.
(iii) CZ will merge with a StateX LLC that is wholly-owned by the
Company, and which will be treated as a disregarded entity for federal
income tax purposes. The shareholders of CZ will receive Shares in
exchange for their stock in CZ.
RULING
The transfers of interests in the Partnerships to the Company in exchange for Shares
will not be treated as a transfer to an investment company within the meaning of section
351(e).
CAVEATS
PLR-129823-15 4
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax treatment of the proposed transactions under any provision of the Code and
regulations or the tax treatment of any condition existing at the time of, or effects
resulting from, the proposed transactions that is not specifically covered by the above
ruling. This includes expressing no opinion on whether the Company, CZ and
TaxpayerX will qualify as a REIT under Part II of Subchapter M of Chapter 1 of the
Code.
PROCEDURAL STATEMENTS
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.
Sincerely,
T. Ian Russell
T. Ian Russell
Branch Chief, Branch 6
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.