Partnership-interest transfers do not trigger the investment company exception

Number
201622001
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Investment Company Exception
Code sections
§ 332, § 351, § 355, § 368, § 1036, § 6110
Ruling dated
February 26, 2016
Publicly released
May 27, 2016

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Taxpayers owned interests in three partnerships that held operating assets and conducted several redacted business activities. They planned to form a company that would elect corporate and real estate investment trust status. Partnership owners would transfer their interests to the new company for shares, cash, or both, while private investors would contribute cash and a related corporation would merge into a disregarded subsidiary. The IRS addressed only the discrete section 351 issue presented. It ruled that the transfers of partnership interests in exchange for company shares would not be treated as transfers to an investment company under section 351(e).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Will exchanging partnership interests for shares in the new company be treated as a transfer to an investment company under § 351(e)?
  • Outcome: Approved.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 351(e); Rev. Proc. 2015-1.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201622001
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/27/2016
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 351.13-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------
-----------------------, ID No. ------------
------------------------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
-----
------------------
--------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------
CC:CORP:5
----------------------------
PLR-105576-16
Date:
February 26, 2016

Taxpayers = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P1 = -------------------------------------------

P2 = --------------------------------------------------

P3 = -----------------------------------------------

AssetsX = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------

AssetsY = ----------------------------------------------

AssetsZ = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

BOP1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------

BOP2 = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BOP3 = --------------------------------------

BOP4 = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------

CY = -----------------------------------

StateX = ------------
PLR-105576-16
2

CZ = ------------------------------

ServicesX = ---------------------------------------------------------------------

TaxpayerX = --------------------------------

Date1 = --------------------------

Year1 = ------

Dear -----------------:

This is in response to the letter dated September 3, 2015, requesting a ruling on a significant issue presented under section 351 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). The information provided in that request and in subsequent correspondence is summarized below.

This letter is issued pursuant to section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2015-1, 2015-1 I.R.B. 1, regarding one or more significant issues under sections 332, 351, 355, 368, or 1036 of the Code. The ruling contained in this letter only addresses one discrete legal issue involved in the transactions described in this letter. This Office expresses no opinion as to the overall tax consequences of these transactions or as to any issue not specifically addressed by the ruling below.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayers and accompanied by “penalties of perjury” statements executed by an appropriate party. This Office has not verified any of the materials submitted in support of the ruling request. Verification of the facts, representations, and other information may be required as part of the audit process.

FACTS

Taxpayers are limited liability companies (“LLCs”) that are treated as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. Taxpayers and other persons own interests in LLCs that are each treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes: P1, P2, and P3 (collectively, “the Partnerships”).

The significant assets of the Partnerships consist of: (i) AssetsX, (ii) AssetsY, and (iii) AssetsZ.

The business operations of the Partnerships consist of: (i) BOP1, (ii) BOP2, (iii) BOP3, and (iv) BOP4.
PLR-105576-16
3

The Partnerships own all of their assets and conduct their business operations directly or through wholly-owned LLCs, with the exception that P2 conducts its BOP2 and BOP3 through its wholly owned subsidiary, CY, a StateX LLC which has elected to be taxed as a corporation for federal income tax purposes.

CZ, a StateX corporation that has elected to be taxed as a subchapter S corporation for federal income tax purposes, provides ServicesX for the Partnerships.

Taxpayers intend to engage in a series of transactions that will include the following steps.

(a) TaxpayerX will form a StateX LLC (the “Company”). The Company will elect to be taxed as a corporation for federal income tax purposes. The Company also will elect to be taxed as a real estate investment trust for (“REIT”) federal income tax purposes commencing with its taxable year ending on Date1.

(b) On a date to be determined in Year1, the following events will occur simultaneously:

(i) One or more private institutional investors will contribute cash to the Company in exchange for stock in the Company (“Shares”). The proceeds from that private offering will be applied to pay transaction expenses, purchase interests in the Partnerships from owners who elect to receive cash rather than Shares in the exchange (described in (ii) below), and possibly to acquire additional AssetsY (having a similar risk profile as those in the Partnerships) and establish reserves for working capital.

(ii) The owners of interests in the Partnerships will transfer their interests in the Partnerships to the Company in exchange for Shares and/or cash.

(iii) CZ will merge with a StateX LLC that is wholly-owned by the Company, and which will be treated as a disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes. The shareholders of CZ will receive Shares in exchange for their stock in CZ.

RULING

The transfers of interests in the Partnerships to the Company in exchange for Shares will not be treated as a transfer to an investment company within the meaning of section 351(e).
PLR-105576-16
4

CAVEATS

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax treatment of the proposed transactions under any provision of the Code and regulations or the tax treatment of any condition existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the proposed transactions that is not specifically covered by the above ruling. This includes expressing no opinion on whether the Company will qualify as a REIT under Part II of Subchapter M of Chapter 1 of the Code.

PROCEDURAL STATEMENTS

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

Sincerely,

T. Ian Russell
T. Ian Russell
Branch Chief, Branch 6
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace