Chief Counsel Advice 201620010 Released May 13, 2016 Advice

An LLC tax matters partner acts through a person authorized under state law

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that when an LLC is the tax matters partner, a person legally authorized to act for the LLC may sign a statute-of-limitations extension on its behalf. Whether someone is a general partner or member manager with authority to act as tax matters partner depends on state law. Federal tax treatment of an entity as disregarded does not change state agency law. It therefore does not automatically turn the disregarded entity's owner into a general partner empowered to bind the other partners.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Who may sign a statute extension when an LLC serves as the tax matters partner?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6231; applicable state partnership and agency law

Full text (IRS public release)

ID:          CCA_2016021108252507
UILC:        6231.07-00

Number: 201620010
Release Date: 5/13/2016
From: --------------------
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 8:25:25 AM
To: --------------------------
Cc: ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bcc:
Subject: RE: Question about TMP


Hi ---------------,

If ------------------------------------- is the TMP and ----------- is the person legally authorized
to sign on behalf of --------------, he may sign the statute extension despite the fact of -----
--------                             . The TMP is the LLC. Only a general partner (or member
manager) may be a TMP. That is a state law concept. The fact that -------------- is
disregarded under federal tax laws cannot change state agency law and convert the
owner of a DE into a general partner with power under state law to bind other partners.

Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can be of any further assistance.

Thanks,
-------

-----------------
----------------------
--------------
--------------------------------
----------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.