Private Letter Ruling 201603043 Released January 15, 2016 Approved Transcribed from scan

Financial institution error does not defeat a retirement plan rollover

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A retirement plan participant received a check payable to a financial institution for his benefit and marked it for deposit into his IRA. The institution instead placed the money in a non-IRA account and later admitted the error. Years later it transferred the investment's then-current value to an IRA, which was less than the original distribution. The IRS waived the 60-day deadline for the amount already transferred and gave the taxpayer another 60 days to contribute up to the remaining difference. The relief remained subject to the other rollover requirements and did not cover required minimum distributions.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does a financial institution's mistaken deposit of a direct-rollover check into a non-IRA account qualify for relief from the 60-day rollover deadline?
  • Outcome: Approved for the later IRA transfer, with 60 additional days to contribute the remaining amount
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(9) and 402(c)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

201603043

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

OCT 21 2015

Uniform Issue List: 402.00-00

Legend:
Taxpayer A =

Plan B =

Financial Institution C =

IRA D =

Amount 1 =
Amount 2 =

Amount 3 =

Dear

This is in response to your request, dated May 18, 2015, from your authorized
representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
contained in section 402(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayer A represents that he received a distribution of Amount 1 from Plan B.
Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period
prescribed by section 402(c)(3) of the Code was due to an error made by Financial
Institution C. Taxpayer A further represents that Amount 1 has not been used for any
other purpose.

Taxpayer A participated in Plan B. On June 1, 2011, Taxpayer A received a
distribution of Amount 1 intending to complete a direct rollover to an IRA with Financial
Institution C. The distribution received by Taxpayer A was in the form of a check made
payable to “Financial Institution C F/B/O Taxpayer A. The check stub indicated, as the
IRS distribution code, Code “G”, indicating a direct rollover. Taxpayer A indicated on
the front of the check the account number of his IRA with Financial Institution C.
Instead of depositing Amount 1 into Taxpayer A’s IRA, Financial Institution C deposited
Amount 1 in a non-IRA account. The submission is accompanied by a letter, dated
November 28, 2014, from Financial Institution C admitting the error. Subsequently, on
May 4, 2015, Financial Institution C transferred Amount 2 to IRA D. Amount 2 was the
value of the Amount 1 investment on May 4, 2015.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal
Revenue Service (the “Service”) waive the 60 day rollover requirement contained in
section 402(c)(3)of the Code with respect to the distribution of Amount 1.

Section 402(c)(1) of the Code provides that if any portion of the balance to the
credit of an employee in a qualified trust is paid to the employee in an eligible rollover
distribution, and the distributee transfers any portion of the property received in such
distribution to an eligible retirement plan, and in the case of a distribution of property
other than money, the amount so transferred consists of the property distributed, then
such distribution (to the extent transferred) shall not be includible in gross income for
the taxable year in which paid. Section 402(c)(3)(A) states that such rollover must be
accomplished within 60 days following the day on which the distributee received the
property. An individual retirement account (IRA) constitutes one form of eligible
retirement plan.

Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that the Secretary
may waive the 60-day requirement under sections 402(c)(3)(A) where the failure to
waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty,
disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such
requirement.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, (January 27, 2003), provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to
section 402(c)(3) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to
complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions
imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the use of the amount distributed (for
example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the
time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is
consistent with his assertion that his failure to accomplish a timely rollover was caused
by an error by Financial Institution C which prevented him from accomplishing the
rollover during the 60-day rollover period.

Therefore, pursuant to section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service hereby
waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from
Plan B. Provided all other requirements of section 402(c)(3) of the Code, except the 60-
day requirement, were met with respect to the transfer of Amount 2 into IRA D, on May
4, 2015, such contribution will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning
of section 402(c)(3) of the Code. Taxpayer A is also granted a period of 60 days from
the issuance of this ruling letter to contribute up to Amount 3 (Amount 1 minus Amount
2) into a rollover IRA. Provided all other requirements of section 402(c)(3) of the Code,
except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such contribution, the amount
transferred (up to Amount 3) will be considered a rollover contribution within the
meaning of section 402(c)(3) of the Code.

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which
may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter ruling has been sent to your authorized representative
pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office. If you wish to inquire about this
ruling, please contact*at*. Please address all correspondence to
SE:T:EP:RA:T2.

Sincerely yours,

Sherri M. Edelman, Manager,
Employee Plans Technical Group 2
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

cc: .

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.