Partner bankruptcy does not bar signing for a nonbankrupt entity

Number
201603029
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Tax Matters Partner; Conversion Under 6223(e)
Code sections
§ 6231
Ruling dated
January 12, 2016
Publicly released
January 15, 2016

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel considered whether an indirect partner's bankruptcy affected that person's ability to sign a statute-of-limitations extension for an entity partner. The entity partner itself had not filed for bankruptcy. Because the individual would sign as the entity's representative rather than in an individual capacity, Counsel advised that the bankruptcy did not impair the authority to sign.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a bankrupt indirect partner sign a statute extension on behalf of a nonbankrupt entity partner?
  • Outcome: Yes, because the signer acts as the entity's representative rather than in an individual capacity
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6231

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2016011208465807 [Third Party Communication:

UILC: 6231.13-06, 6231.07-00 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]

Number: 201603029
Release Date: 1/15/2016
From:
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 8:46:58 AM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: TEFRA question

Hi -------,

I do not believe the indirect partner’s bankruptcy will have any effect on the indirect partner’s ability to sign a statute extension on behalf of an entity-partner because the entity-partner did not file for bankruptcy and the indirect partner is acting as a representative of that entity and not in his individual capacity.

Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Thanks,
--------

-----------------
----------------------
--------------
--------------------------------
----------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace