Chief Counsel Advice 201603029 Released January 15, 2016 Advice

Partner bankruptcy does not bar signing for a nonbankrupt entity

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2016, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2016
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel considered whether an indirect partner's bankruptcy affected that person's ability to sign a statute-of-limitations extension for an entity partner. The entity partner itself had not filed for bankruptcy. Because the individual would sign as the entity's representative rather than in an individual capacity, Counsel advised that the bankruptcy did not impair the authority to sign.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a bankrupt indirect partner sign a statute extension on behalf of a nonbankrupt entity partner?
  • Outcome: Yes, because the signer acts as the entity's representative rather than in an individual capacity
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6231

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2016011208465807 [Third Party Communication:

UILC: 6231.13-06, 6231.07-00 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]

Number: 201603029
Release Date: 1/15/2016
From:
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 8:46:58 AM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: TEFRA question

Hi -------,

I do not believe the indirect partner’s bankruptcy will have any effect on the indirect
partner’s ability to sign a statute extension on behalf of an entity-partner because the
entity-partner did not file for bankruptcy and the indirect partner is acting as a
representative of that entity and not in his individual capacity.

Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Thanks,

-----------------

--------------


Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2016, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.