Related-entity transfers may be treated as a direct transfer
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A foreign subsidiary loaned funds to a second foreign corporation, which distributed the funds to its U.S. parent. That U.S. corporation then distributed the same funds to the common U.S. parent of the group. Chief Counsel advised that, based on the facts, substance-over-form principles could treat the series as a direct transfer from the first foreign subsidiary to the common parent. The memorandum offered no other recommendations or arguments.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should a series of fund transfers among related corporations be respected in its stated form?
- Outcome: Advice given
- Key authorities: Substance-over-form principles; IRC § 301
Full text (IRS public release)
Office of Chief Counsel
Internal Revenue Service
Memorandum
Number: 201552027
Release Date: 12/24/2015
CC:CORP:B06: GRJohnson
Third Party Communication: None
POSTU-102445-15
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
UILC: 301.01-07
date: August 19, 2015
to: Associate Area Counsel (Miami)
(Large Business & International)
Attn: Timothy L. Smith
from: George R. Johnson
General Attorney, Branch 6
(Corporate)
subject: Treatment of Series of Transfers
This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your request for assistance dated June 16, 2015. This advice may not be used or cited as precedent.
This is in response to your request for advice regarding whether a series of transfers of funds by multiple, related entities should be respected for Federal income tax purposes.
This advice may not be used or cited as precedent.
In one series of transfers (in form): (i) a foreign corporation (FC1) wholly-owned by a U.S. corporation (Parent) loaned funds to another foreign corporation (FC2), which in turn was wholly-owned by a U.S. subsidiary of Parent (USSub); (ii) FC2 distributed those funds to USSub; and (iii) USSub distributed those funds to Parent (no reference is made to any disregarded entities). Based on the facts, the series of transfers may be treated as a transfer of the funds by FC1 to Parent based on substance-over-form principles.
We do not have any other recommendations or arguments at this time.
This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this writing may undermine our ability to protect the privileged information. If disclosure is determined to be necessary, please contact this office for our views.
POSTU-102445-15
2
Please call ----------------------- at --------------------- if you have any further questions.
_____
Thomas I. Russell
Branch Chief, Branch 6
(Corporate)
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace