Missed QSST elections do not end S status
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An irrevocable trust held stock in an S corporation through separate shares for five individual beneficiaries. Each share was represented to qualify as a qualified subchapter S trust, but the beneficiaries did not timely file the required QSST elections. The IRS concluded that the resulting termination of the corporation's S election was inadvertent under IRC § 1362(f). It allowed S corporation treatment to continue, conditioned on the beneficiaries filing the QSST elections with the original effective date within 120 days. The IRS did not rule on whether the trust shares actually qualified as QSSTs or as separate trusts.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can the corporation retain S status after beneficiaries missed elections for separate QSST shares?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 663(c), 1361(c), 1361(d), 1362(f)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201549017 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/4/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.00-00, 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------- -------------------------, ID No. -----------------
----------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:02
PLR-108924-15
Date:
August 11, 2015
LEGEND
X = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State = ---------
Year = -------
A = ------------------------------------------
B = ----------------------
C = --------------------
D = -------------------------
E = ---------------------------
F = ----------------------
Date1 = ----------------------
Date2 = --------------------
Date3 = -------------------
Date4 = --------------------------
PLR-108924-15 2
Date5 = --------------------------
N1 = -----
Dear ---------------:
This responds to a letter dated March 3, 2015, and subsequent correspondence,
submitted on behalf of X by X’s authorized representative, requesting a ruling under
§1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”).
The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State
in Year1. X elected to be an S corporation effective Date1. Under a trust agreement
dated Date2, A established Trust as a revocable trust for her benefit and, at her death,
for the benefit of B, C, D, E and F. On Date3, Trust acquired N1 shares of stock of X.
Trust became irrevocable upon A’s death on Date4.
X represents that each of B, C, D, E and F (the “beneficiaries”) is an individual
and a citizen of the United States. X further represents that, pursuant to the trust
agreement of Trust, the beneficiaries are properly treated as each owning substantially
separate and independent shares of Trust within the meaning of §§ 663(c) and
1361(d)(3) of the Code. X also represents that each of the separate shares of Trust for
the beneficiaries meets the requirements as a Qualified Subchapter S Trust (QSST),
except that no QSST elections had been timely filed on behalf of the separate shares of
Trust for each of the beneficiaries by Date5 (the due date for the election, taking into
account both § 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) and § 1361(d)(2)(D)) under § 1361(d)(2).
X represents that X and X’s shareholders have filed tax returns consistent with X
being an S corporation since Date5. X further represents that the circumstances
resulting in the termination of X’s S corporation election were inadvertent and were not
motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and each person who was or
is a shareholder of X at any time since Date5 agree to make any adjustments
(consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation) as may be required by the
Secretary with respect to such period.
Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to
any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for such year.
Section 1361(b)(1)(B) provides that a “small business corporation” means a
domestic corporation that is not an ineligible corporation and that does not have as a
shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an
organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual.
PLR-108924-15 3
Section 1362(a)(1) provides that, except as provided in § 1362(g), a small
business corporation may elect, in accordance with the provisions of § 1362, to be an S
corporation.
Section 1362(d)(2) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated
whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which the
corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation. A termination of an S corporation election under § 1362(d)(2) is effective
on or after the date of cessation.
Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any
corporation was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3); (2) the Secretary determines that
the circumstances resulting in such termination were inadvertent; (3) no later than a
reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the
termination, steps were taken so that the corporation is a small business corporation;
and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at
any time during the period specified under § 1362(f), agrees to make the adjustments
(consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be
required by the Secretary for that period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances
resulting in such termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during
the period specified by the Secretary.
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that X’s S corporation election terminated on Date5 due to the failure of the
beneficiaries to properly and timely file QSST elections for their separate shares of
Trust. We conclude that the termination was inadvertent within the meaning of
§ 1362(f). Pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be
an S corporation on Date5 and thereafter, unless X’s S corporation election otherwise
terminated under § 1362(d).
This ruling is contingent upon the beneficiaries of the separate shares of Trust
filing QSST elections for their separate shares of Trust, with an effective date of Date5,
within 120 days of the date of this letter. A copy of this letter should be attached to each
QSST election.
If the above conditions are not met, then this letter ruling is null and void.
Furthermore, if these conditions are not met, X must send a notification that its S
election has terminated to the service center with which X’s S election was filed.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied regarding X’s
eligibility to be an S corporation or the validity of its S corporation election. Further, no
opinion is expressed or implied as to whether Trust and/or its separate shares qualify as
PLR-108924-15 4
QSSTs. Finally, no opinion is expressed or implied regarding whether the separate
shares of Trust are substantially separate and independent shares of a trust within the
meaning of § 663(c) and properly treated as separate trusts for purposes of §§ 1361(c)
and (d).
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Bradford R. Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.