Stock transfer between affiliated charities avoids an ownership change

Plain-English summary

Two affiliated tax-exempt organizations described in IRC § 501(c)(3) reorganized ownership of a for-profit subsidiary. The subsidiary had a net operating loss carryforward, and one exempt organization sold all of its stock to the other in a taxable sale. The organizations represented that neither exempt entity planned to convert to for-profit status and that the subsidiary had not undergone another ownership change during the prior three years. Based on the submitted facts and representations, the IRS ruled that the stock transfer did not cause an ownership change of the subsidiary under IRC § 382(g). That conclusion preserves the transaction from triggering the section 382 ownership-change limitation addressed by the ruling.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Did the transfer of all subsidiary stock between the affiliated tax-exempt organizations cause an ownership change under IRC § 382(g)?
• Outcome: Approved
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 382(g), 501(a), 501(c)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201549010 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/4/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 382.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------- -----------------------, ID No. --------------
-------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
----------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------- CC:CORP:B04
PLR-106860-15
Date:
August 24, 2015

Legend:

Taxpayer = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------

Tax Exempt 1 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------

Tax Exempt 2 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Nonprofit = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------

Date 1 = ------------------------

Date 2 = ----------------------

Date 3 = ------------------------

Date 4 = ------------------------

State A = -------

State B = ---------------

State C = ----------
PLR-106860-15 2

Business A = -----------------------------

Business B = ---------------------------------------------

Dear --------------:

   This letter responds to your January 31, 2015, letter requesting rulings on certain

federal income tax consequences of a completed transaction involving the above
taxpayer. The material information submitted in that request and in subsequent
correspondence is summarized below.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalties of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings. Verification of the information,
representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit process.

   Tax Exempt 1 and Tax Exempt 2 are tax exempt entities under section 501(a) of

the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) as organizations described in section 501(c)(3) of
the Code. Tax Exempt 1 was organized under State A law and conducted Business A
in State A and in State C. Following its acquisition of Taxpayer, as described below,
Tax Exempt 1 conducted Business A in State A, State B and in State C.

    Pursuant to an affiliation agreement executed on Date 1 (the “Affiliation

Agreement”), Tax Exempt 2 affiliated with and became a subsidiary of Tax Exempt 1,
effective on Date 2. Tax Exempt 1 held all of the membership interest in Tax Exempt 2.

   Tax Exempt 2 was organized under State B law and conducted Business A in

State B. Tax Exempt 2 owned all of the stock of Taxpayer.

 Taxpayer was incorporated in State B as a for profit corporation and was

engaged in Business B. Taxpayer provided Business B services to customers of Tax
Exempt 2.

     Pursuant to a stock purchase agreement executed on Date 3, Tax Exempt 2

sold all of the stock of Taxpayer to Tax Exempt 1 in a taxable sale, effective on Date 4.
Taxpayer had a net operating loss carryforward on the date of the sale. Taxpayer
thereafter provided Business B services to customers of Tax Exempt 1 in addition to
providing services to customers of Tax Exempt 2.

   Each of Taxpayer and Tax Exempt 2 has its own management and board of

directors that exercises day to day control over the business affairs, but Tax Exempt 1
has the power to exercise general oversight authority over the affiliated entities,
including the power to appoint and remove directors pursuant to the Affiliation
PLR-106860-15 3

Agreement. Tax Exempt 1 also oversees and coordinates the activities of the Business
A system carried on by Tax Exempt 2.

   Tax Exempt 1, Tax Exempt 2 and Taxpayer each file a stand-alone return for

federal income tax purposes.

    Tax Exempt 1 is governed by State A law, which provides that a nonprofit

corporation cannot distribute its assets, except upon dissolution. State A law further
provides that if a nonprofit corporation’s organizing documents do not provide for the
distribution of assets upon the nonprofit corporation’s dissolution, the nonprofit
corporation’s assets shall be distributed to one or more persons described in section
501(c)(3) of the Code.

   The charter for Tax Exempt 1 provides that upon its dissolution, the remaining

assets shall be distributed to one or more organizations described in section 501(c)(3)
of the Code as selected by the Board of Directors of Tax Exempt 1.

    Tax Exempt 2 is governed by State B law, which prohibits a nonprofit corporation

from making distributions or any other payments to another organization unless the
distribution is made in accordance with the stated purpose of the nonprofit corporation
and the distributee is exempt from taxation under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. State
B law further provides that upon dissolution, the distribution of assets must be provided
for within the nonprofit corporation’s articles of incorporation or bylaws.

  The charter for Tax Exempt 2 provides that upon its dissolution, the assets of Tax

Exempt 2 will be distributed, subject to the approval of Tax Exempt 1, to Nonprofit, an
organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code; or to an organization with
purposes substantially similar to those of Tax Exempt 2, as determined by Tax Exempt
1.
Representations

(a) There is no plan or intention to convert Tax Exempt 1 or Tax Exempt 2 to a for profit
entity.

(b) Taxpayer did not undergo an ownership change as defined in section 382(g) during
the three year period prior to Date 4.

(c) Taxpayer has no issued or outstanding stock options.

                                     Ruling

Based upon the information provided and the representations made, we rule as follows:
PLR-106860-15 4

  The transfer from Tax Exempt 2 to Tax Exempt 1 of all of the stock of Taxpayer

does not result in an ownership change of the Taxpayer within the meaning of section
382(g).

                                       Caveat

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax treatment of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. We express no opinion about the tax treatment of the
transaction as described under other provisions of the Code or regulations, or the tax
treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the
transaction that is not specifically covered by the above ruling.

    Temporary or final regulations pertaining to one or more of the issues addressed

in this ruling letter have not yet been adopted. Therefore, the service may modify or
revoke this letter if temporary or final regulations as adopted are inconsistent with any
conclusions herein. See section 11.04(4) of Revenue Procedure 2015-1, 2015-1
I.R.B. 1, 61. However, when the criteria in section 11.04 of Rev. Proc. 2015-1 are
satisfied, the Service will not revoke or retroactively modify a ruling except in rare or
unusual circumstances.

                               Procedural Statements

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the

Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

   A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is

relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control
number of this letter ruling.

     In accordance with the power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling

letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

                                        Sincerely,



                                        ____________________________________
                                        Isaac W. Zimbalist
                                        Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
                                        Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)