Private Letter Ruling 201542009 Released October 16, 2015 Approved Transcribed from scan

Bank’s duplicate IRA distribution justified rollover waiver

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer received scheduled substantially equal periodic payments from several IRAs. A computer error caused the financial institution to make an unauthorized duplicate distribution from one IRA, and the taxpayer did not discover it until reviewing the prior year’s return. The institution acknowledged its mistake. The IRS found that the taxpayer’s failure to complete a timely rollover resulted from the undiscovered financial-institution error, waived the 60-day deadline, and granted 60 days from the ruling’s issuance to contribute the duplicate amount to an IRA. The ruling did not decide whether the overall payment series satisfied section 72(t)(2)(A)(iv).

Ruling snapshot

  • Request: Waive the 60-day deadline for an unauthorized duplicate IRA distribution
  • Outcome: Approved; 60 days from the ruling’s issuance to contribute the amount to an IRA
  • Key authorities: I.R.C. §§ 72(t)(2)(A)(iv), 408(d)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

COMMISSIONER                                      201542009

JUL 22 2015

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00                         SE:T:EP:RA:T1

Legend

Taxpayer A =
IRA B =
Account C =

Financial Institution D =

Amount 1 =

Dear             :

This letter is in response to a request for a letter ruling dated April 17, 2014, as
supplemented by correspondence dated June 26, 2015, from your authorized
representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations were submitted under penalty of perjury
in support of your request for a waiver.

Taxpayer A maintained IRA B, an individual retirement account as defined in
section 408(a) of the Code, with Financial Institution D. Taxpayer A represents
that on November 14, 2012, Financial Institution D mistakenly made a duplicate
distribution, equal to Amount 1, from IRA B. Taxpayer A asserts that his failure
to accomplish a rollover of Amount 1 within the 60-day rollover period prescribed


2 201542009

by section 408(d)(3)(A) was because he was not aware that Financial Institution
D had made the unauthorized distribution.

Taxpayer A represents that in 2009, he began receiving substantially equal
periodic payments within the meaning of section 72(t)(2)(A)(iv) of the Code from
his IRA accounts. At this time, Taxpayer A instructed Financial Institution D to
annually distribute Amount 1 from IRA B, with additional amounts to be
distributed from Taxpayer A’s other IRAs. Beginning in 2009, Financial Institution
D distributed Amount 1 in October of each year via electronic transfer from IRA B
to Account C, a non-IRA checking account that was also maintained by Financial
Institution D. However, on November 14, 2012, Financial Institution D distributed
an additional amount, equal to Amount 1, due to a computer systems error that
caused the duplicate payment to be made one month after the regularly
scheduled payment. During October of 2013, while reviewing his 2012 federal
Income Tax Return as prepared by his accountant, Taxpayer A discovered the
distribution of the duplicate payment. The request for relief is accompanied by a
letter from Financial Institution D acknowledging its mistake.

Based on the above facts and representations, you request that the Service
waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1
from IRA B on November 14, 2012, and that Taxpayer A be given 60 days
following the issuance of a letter granting a waiver to roll over Amount 1 into an
IRA.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in
section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in
gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner
provided under section 72.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) does not apply
to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit

the IRA is maintained if:

(i) the entire amount received (including money or any other property) is
paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after
the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into
such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible
in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).


3 201542009

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply
to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from
an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt
such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i)
from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application
of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for
partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section
408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary of the Treasury may
waive the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and (D) where the
failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience,
including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the
individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after
December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I).

Revenue Procedure 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, provides that in determining
whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section
408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2)
inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization,
incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the
use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,
whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution
occurred.

The information and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A support his
assertion that the failure to timely roll over Amount 1 into IRA B was because he
was not aware that on November 14, 2012, Financial Institution D erroneously
made a duplicate distribution, equal to Amount 1, from IRA B.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby
waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of
Amount 1 from IRA B on November 14, 2012. Taxpayer A is granted a period of
60 days from the issuance of this letter ruling to contribute Amount 1 into an IRA.
Provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3), except the 60-day rollover
requirement, are met with respect to such contribution, the contribution will be
considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3).

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 408(a)(6) of the Code.


4                                               201542009

This ruling is limited to a request for a waiver of the 60-day rollover period. No
opinion is expressed as to whether the payments from IRA B and Taxpayer A’s
other IRAs constitute a series of substantially equal periodic payments within the
meaning of section 72(t)(2)(A)(iv) of the Code.

Further, no opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction
described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or
regulations that may be applicable hereto.

This letter ruling is directed solely to the taxpayer who requested it. Section
6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling
is being sent to your authorized representative.

If you have any questions regarding this ruling, you may contact ;
at .

Sincerely yours,

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Notice of Intention to Disclose
Deleted copy of this letter

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.