Ineligible entity shareholders caused only an inadvertent S termination

Number
201542001
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 6110
Ruling dated
July 6, 2015
Publicly released
October 16, 2015

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation’s sole shareholder transferred shares to another S corporation and a partnership, both ineligible S corporation shareholders, which terminated the subsidiary’s S election. After discovering the problem, the corporation took corrective steps to restore eligible ownership, although additional ineligible entities briefly held shares during that process. The corporation represented that neither the original termination nor the corrective transfers were motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning and agreed to required adjustments. The IRS treated both the termination and the momentary corrective ownership as inadvertent under section 1362(f), allowing the corporation to continue as an S corporation from the termination date if its election was otherwise valid.

Ruling snapshot

  • Request: Treat the S corporation election termination caused by ineligible shareholders as inadvertent
  • Outcome: Approved; continuous S corporation treatment preserved
  • Key authorities: I.R.C. §§ 1361, 1362(f)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201542001
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/16/2015
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------- -------------------------, ID No. ----------------- ----------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------- ---------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B3
PLR-100319-15
Date:
July 06, 2015

LEGEND

X = ----------------------------------------------
------------------------

Y = ------------------
-------------------------

Z = ------------------------------------------------
-------------------------

Trust 1 = --------------------------------
-------------------------

Trust 2 = ---------------------------------
-------------------------

A = -------------------
------------------------------------------------------

State = ---------

Date 1 = --------------------------

Date 2 = --------------------

Date 3 = -------------------

Date 4 = ----------------------------
PLR-100319-15
2

Dear -------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated December 19, 2014, and subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

FACTS

The information submitted states that X was incorporated in State on Date 1 and elected to be treated as an S corporation effective Date 1. On Date 2, A, the sole shareholder of X, contributed shares of X to Y, an S corporation, and Z, a partnership, ineligible S corporation shareholders under § 1361(b)(1)(B). As a result, X’s S corporation election terminated on Date 2.

In Date 3, X learned that its S corporation election terminated on Date 2. After learning that X’s S corporation election was terminated, X took corrective actions so that by Date 4, all of X’s shareholders were eligible S corporation shareholders under § 1361(b)(1)(B). As part of the corrective actions, ineligible S corporation shareholders, Y, Trust 1 and Trust 2, momentarily held shares of X.

X represents that the termination of X’s S corporation election was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation as may be required by the Commissioner with respect to the period specified by § 1362(f).

LAW

Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term "S corporation" means, with respect to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for such year.

Section 1361(b)(1) provides, in part, that the term "small business corporation" means a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual.

Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) provides that, for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), a trust all of which is treated (under subpart E of part 1 of subchapter J of chapter 1 of the Code) as owned by an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States may be a shareholder.

Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for
PLR-100319-15
3
which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.

Section 1362(f) provides, in part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to acquire the required shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that X's S corporation election terminated on Date 2 because X had ineligible shareholders.
However, we conclude that the termination on Date 2, and the ineligible shareholders’ momentary ownership of shares in X as part of X’s corrective action were inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Accordingly, under § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation on and after Date 2, provided that X's S corporation election was valid and not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).

Except as specifically ruled above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provisions of the Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion as to whether X is otherwise eligible to be treated as an S corporation.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-100319-15
4

In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Mary Beth Carchia
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace