Governmental excess benefit arrangement qualified

Number
201539030
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Limitations on Benefits and Contributions Under Qualified Plans; Qualified Governmental Excess Benefit Plans
Code sections
§ 83, § 115, § 401, § 402, § 414, § 415, § 451, § 501, § 671-679, § 6110
Ruling dated
June 22, 2015
Publicly released
September 25, 2015

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A public authority adopted a separate plan to pay governmental pension benefits that could not be paid from its qualified plan because of section 415(b)'s limits. Participation was mandatory for affected retirees, no participant could elect to defer compensation, and a separate trust would be funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. The IRS ruled that the plan was a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement under section 415(m). Benefits would be included in recipients' gross income when paid or otherwise made available. Income accruing to the arrangement would be exempt from federal income tax under sections 115 and 415(m)(1) as income from an essential governmental function.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Whether the excess plan qualified under section 415(m), when benefits were taxable, and whether plan income was exempt
  • Outcome: Approved on all three requested rulings
  • Key authorities: I.R.C. §§ 83, 115, 401, 402(b), 414(d), 415(m), 451

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201539030 Third Party Communication: None Release Date: 9/25/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable

Index Number: 415.00-00, 415.12-00

Person To Contact:

, ID No.

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:TEGE:EB:QP4

PLR-T-102479-15

Date:
June 22, 2015

Authority A =
Plan P =
Board B =
Excess Plan X =
State S =

Dear :

This letter is in response to your ruling request, submitted by your authorized representative on your behalf, dated January 26, 2012 and supplemented by correspondence dated March 19, 2015, with respect to the applicability of section 415(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) to an excess benefit plan (“Excess Plan X”) and the related federal tax consequences.

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalties of perjury in support of your request:

Authority A is a port authority and a public instrumentality of State S which owns and operates various airport and port properties. Authority A sponsors Plan P, a defined benefit pension plan administered by a five member board, Board B. Board B consists of the secretary-treasurer of Authority A, two elected members, one member appointed by Authority A and one member appointed by the other four board members.

Plan P is a qualified governmental plan as described in section 414(d) which provides pension benefits to the employees of Authority A. Plan P is intended to meet the qualification requirements of section 401(a). Contributions to Plan P are mandatory for

PLR-T-102479-15 2
all employees of Authority A and are equal to a fixed percentage of each participant's compensation.

On January 25, 2012, Board B adopted Excess Plan X. Excess Plan X is intended to be a qualified excess benefit arrangement within the meaning of section 415(m). Excess Plan X will be administered by Board B. The purpose of Excess Plan X is solely to provide the portion of a participant’s retirement benefit that would otherwise have been payable by Plan P, except for the limitations of section 415(b).

All participants and beneficiaries of Plan P are required to participate in Excess Plan X if their retirement benefit from Plan P for a plan year is or has been since January 1, 2012, limited by section 415(b). Participation in Excess Plan X is mandatory and automatic for all participants and will commence in each plan year that a retired participant or beneficiary has retirement benefits that exceeds the limits set forth in section 415(b). In addition, under the represented facts, there will be no employee contributions to Excess Plan X.

Excess Plan X provides that a participant will receive a benefit equal to the amount of retirement benefit that would have been payable to, or with respect to, a participant that could not be paid by Plan P because of the limitations under section 415(b). An excess benefit under Excess Plan X will be paid only if and to the extent the participant is receiving retirement benefits from Plan P. Under the terms of Excess Plan X, no election is provided to a participant to defer compensation under Excess Plan X, whether directly or indirectly. The benefit to which a participant or beneficiary is entitled under Excess Plan X in each plan year will be paid commencing during or within the month in which all monthly payments of the retirement benefits under Plan P are paid.

Board B has established a fund, separate and apart from the funds of Plan P, to hold the contributions intended to pay excess benefits to participants as set forth in Excess Plan X. The trust fund is designed as a grantor trust within the meaning of sections 671 through 679.

Excess Plan X will be funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. Board B will determine the amount necessary to pay the excess benefits under Excess Plan X for each plan year.
The required contribution will be the aggregate of the excess benefits payable to all affected participants for such plan year plus an amount determined by Board B to be a necessary and reasonable expense of administering Excess Plan X. Authority A, in determining the amount of appropriations necessary to fund Plan P, will also determine the amount necessary to fund Excess Plan X. The amount so determined will be withheld from appropriations to Plan P before being credited to Plan P and deposited into the trust fund of Excess Plan X. Under no circumstances will appropriations to fund excess benefits be credited to Plan P. Any contributions not used to pay the excess benefits for a current year, together with any income accruing to the trust fund, will be used to pay the administrative expenses of Excess Plan X for the plan year. Any

PLR-T-102479-15 3
contributions not so used that remain after the payment of administrative expenses will be used to fund administrative expenses or excess benefits of participants in future years.

Based upon the facts and representations stated above, the following rulings are requested:

1. Excess Plan X establishes a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement within the meaning of section 415(m).

2. The benefits payable under Excess Plan X will be includible in gross income for the taxable year or years in which such benefits are paid or otherwise made available to a participant or a participant’s beneficiary in accordance with the terms of Excess Plan X.

3. Income accruing to Excess Plan X is exempt from federal income tax under Code sections 115 and 415(m)(1) as income derived from the exercise of an essential governmental function.

Section 415(b) and § 1.415(b)-1 of the Income Tax Regulations (“Regulations”) set forth the limitations on annual benefits for participants in defined benefit plans.

Section 415(m)(1) provides that, in determining whether a governmental plan (as defined in section 414(d)) meets the benefit limitations of section 415, benefits provided under a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement shall not be taken into account. Section 415(m)(1) also states that income accruing to a governmental plan (or to a trust that is maintained solely for the purpose of providing benefits under a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement) shall constitute income derived from the exercise of an essential governmental function upon which such governmental plan (or trust) shall be exempt from tax under section 115.

Section 415(m)(2) describes the tax treatment of benefits payable under a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement. Under section 415(m)(2), the taxable year or years for which amounts in respect of a qualified excess benefit arrangement are includable in gross income by a participant, and the treatment of such amounts when so includible by the participant, are determined as if such qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement were treated as a plan for the deferral of compensation that is maintained by a corporation not exempt from tax and which does not meet the requirements for qualification under section 401.

Section 415(m)(3) defines a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement as a portion of a governmental plan that meets the following three requirements:

PLR-T-102479-15 4

(A) Such portion is maintained solely for the purpose of providing to participants in the plan that part of the participant's annual benefit otherwise payable under the terms of the plan that exceeds the limitations on benefits imposed by section 415 (“excess benefits”);

(B) Under such portion no election is provided at any time to the participant (directly or indirectly) to defer compensation; and

(C) Excess benefits are not paid from a trust forming a part of such governmental plan unless such trust is maintained solely for the purpose of providing such benefits.

With respect to your first requested ruling, Excess Plan X was adopted by Board B as a part of Plan P. It has been represented that Plan P is a governmental plan as described in section 414(d). It has also been represented that the only purpose of Excess Plan X is to provide affected employees who are participants in Plan P that portion of their benefits that would otherwise be payable under the terms of Plan P except for the limitations on benefits imposed by section 415(b), as applicable to governmental plans.
The terms of Excess Plan X limit participation to participants in Plan P for whom benefits would exceed the limits of section 415. Therefore, we have determined that Excess Plan X is a portion of a governmental plan which is maintained solely for the purpose of providing to employees of Authority A who participate in Plan P that part of the participants’ benefits otherwise payable under the terms of Plan P that exceed the section 415 limits, and, as such, meets the requirements of section 415(m)(3)(A).

Your authorized representatives have stated that participation in Excess Plan X is required for all participants or beneficiaries of Plan P whose benefits are limited by Section 415(m) and commences automatically each plan year that a participant or beneficiary has an excess benefit, and that there are no employee contributions to Excess Plan X. Your representatives also assert that no direct or indirect election to defer compensation is provided to any participant in Excess Plan X. Thus, we have determined that no direct or indirect election is provided at any time to participants to defer compensation, and accordingly, the requirements of section 415(m)(3)(B) are met.

Section 415(m)(3)(C) requires that the trust from which the excess benefits are paid must not form a part of the governmental plan which contains the excess benefit arrangement, unless such trust is maintained solely for the purpose of providing such benefits. In this case, Excess Plan X will be funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. Board B established a trust fund for the segregation of assets related to Excess Plan X which is maintained separately from Plan P. This trust fund was established solely for the purpose of holding employer contributions intended to pay excess benefits to affected Plan P participants and beneficiaries. Contributions to the trust fund will consist only of the amounts required to pay the excess benefits and administrative expenses for the plan year. Any contributions not used to pay the excess benefits for a current plan year, together with any income accruing to the trust fund, will be used to pay the administrative expenses of Excess Plan X for the plan year. Any contributions not so

PLR-T-102479-15 5
used that remain after the payment of administrative expenses will be used to fund excess benefits of participants or pay administrative expenses in future years.
Therefore, we have determined that the requirements of section 415(m)(3)(C) are met.

Since Excess Plan X satisfies all of the requirements of section 415(m)(3) , we conclude, with respect to your first ruling request, that Excess Plan X is a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement within the meaning of section 415(m).

Your second ruling request asks whether the benefits payable under Excess Plan X will be includible in gross income for the taxable year or years in which such benefits are paid or otherwise made available to a participant or a participant’s beneficiary in accordance with the terms of Excess Plan X. In response to your first ruling request, we determined that Excess Plan X meets the legal requirements of section 415(m) and, therefore, constitutes a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement.
Accordingly, under section 415(m)(2), the tax treatment of the amounts distributed under Excess Plan X to the participants is determined as if such qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement were a plan for the deferral of compensation which is maintained by a corporation not exempt from tax and which does not meet the requirements for qualification under section 401.

Section 83(a) provides the rules for inclusion in gross income of the value of property transferred to an employee as compensation for his or her services. The excess of the fair market value of property so transferred over the amount paid for the property is includible in the gross income of the person who performed the services for the first taxable year in which the property becomes transferable or is not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

Section 1.83-3(e) defines the term “property” as including real and personal property other than money or an unfunded and unsecured promise to pay money or property in the future. Under section 1.83-3(e), property also includes a beneficial interest in assets (including money) transferred or set aside from claims of the transferor’s creditors, for example, in a trust or escrow account.

Section 402(b) provides that contributions made by an employer to an employee’s trust that is not exempt from tax under section 501(a) are included in the employee’s gross income in accordance with section 83, except that the value of the employee’s interest in the trust will be substituted for the fair market value of the property in applying section 83. Under § 1.402(b)-1(a)(1), an employer's contributions to a nonexempt employee’s trust are included as compensation in the employee’s gross income for the taxable year in which the contribution is made, but only to the extent that the employee's interest in such contribution is substantially vested, as defined in the Regulations under section 83.

Section 451(a) and § 1.451-1(a) provide that an item of gross income is includible in gross income for the taxable year in which actually or constructively received by a

PLR-T-102479-15 6
taxpayer using the cash receipts and disbursements method of accounting. Under § 1.451-2(a), income is constructively received in the taxable year during which it is credited to a taxpayer’s account, set apart, or otherwise made available so that the taxpayer may draw on it at any time. However, § 1.451-2(a) further provides that income is not constructively received if the taxpayer’s control of its receipt is subject to substantial limitations or restrictions.

The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has also addressed the issue of constructive receipt as it applies to nonqualified plans of deferred compensation, including excess

~ benefit plans, in various revenue rulings. In Rev. Rul. 60-31, Situations 1-3, the IRS held that a mere promise to pay, not represented by notes or secured in any way, does not constitute receipt of income by a cash basis taxpayer. Rev. Rul. 60-31, 1960-1 C.B.
174, as modified by Rev. Rul. 64-279, 1964-2 C.B. 121, and Rev. Rul. 70-435, 1970-2 C.B. 100; see also Rev. Rul. 69-650, 1969-2 C.B. 106, Rev. Rul. 69-649, 1969-2 C.B.
106; and Rev. Rul. 71-419, 1971-2 C.B. 220..

Under the economic benefit doctrine, an employee is taxable in a year in which any economic or financial benefit is conferred upon the employee as compensation. Sproull v. Commissioner, 16 T.C. 244 (1951), aff'd per curiam, 194 F.2d 541 (6th Cir. 1952). An economic benefit is conferred on an employee when assets are unconditionally and irrevocably paid into a fund or trust to be used for the employee’s sole benefit. Id. In Rev. Rul. 72-25, 1972-1 C.B. 127, and Rev. Rul. 68-99, 1968-1 C.B. 193, an employee does not receive income as a result of the employer's purchase of an insurance contract to provide a source of funds for deferred compensation because the insurance contract is the employer's asset, subject to the claims of the employer's creditors.

Based on the foregoing, with respect to the second ruling request, we conclude that the benefits payable under Excess Plan X will be includible in gross income for the taxable year or years in which such benefits are paid or otherwise made available to a
participant or a participant’s beneficiary in accordance with the terms of Excess Plan X.

With respect to your third requested ruling, section 415(m)(1) provides that income accruing to a governmental plan (or to a trust that is maintained solely for the purpose of providing benefits under a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement) in respect of a qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement will constitute income derived from the exercise of an essential governmental function upon which such governmental plan (or trust) will be exempt from tax under section 115. We have determined, in connection with your first ruling request, that Excess Plan X meets the legal requirements of section 415(m) for qualified governmental excess benefit arrangements. Therefore, under section 415(m)(1), with respect to your third requested ruling, we conclude that income accruing to Excess Plan X is exempt from federal income tax under sections 115 and 415(m)(1) as income derived from the exercise of an essential governmental function.

PLR-T-102479-15 7

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

No opinion is expressed as to whether the trust fund established for the purpose of holding employer contributions intended to pay excess benefits to Excess Plan X participants constitutes a grantor trust under Rev. Proc. 92-64, 1992-33 I.R.B. 11.

This letter assumes that Plan P is and was a governmental plan as described in section 414(d), is and was qualified under section 401, and its related trust is and was exempt from tax under section 501(a) at all relevant times thereto.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,

Cheryl E. Press

Senior Counsel

Qualified Plans Branch 4

Tax Exempt and Government Entities

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace