Airline plan's revised actuarial assumptions approved

Number
201538029
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Determination Letter
IRS subject
Minimum funding standards for single-employer defined benefit pension plans
Code sections
§ 412, § 430, § 6110
Ruling dated
June 24, 2015
Publicly released
September 18, 2015

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's determination, issued in 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An employer with a frozen airline pension plan asked to change actuarial assumptions after federal law allowed pilots to continue flying until age 65 and later experience showed different retirement behavior. The proposed assumptions covered retirement payment forms and retirement rates by age. Because the changes would reduce the plan's funding shortfall by more than $50 million, IRC § 430(h)(5) required IRS approval. The IRS approved the specified assumptions for the 2013 plan year but did not approve the employer's calculations or decide whether the plan satisfied other Code requirements.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the airline pension plan use revised payment-form and pilot-retirement assumptions for its 2013 funding calculations?
  • Outcome: Approved for the specified assumptions only
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 412(c)(5)(B), 430(c)(4), 430(d), 430(h)(5); ERISA §§ 302(c)(5)(B), 303(h)(5)

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0430.00-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 201538029

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

JUN 24 2015

Re: ( ) ( )
EIN:
Employer =

Plan Year Beginning in 2013 =
Dear [redacted]:

This letter constitutes notice that approval has been granted for the change in assumptions described below. This approval applies for the Plan Year Beginning in 2013 and has been granted in accordance with section 430(h)(5)¹ of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and section 303(h)(5) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”)².

In granting this approval, we have considered only the acceptability of the new assumptions and, as necessary, the method by which the transition is to be made between the prior and the new method. Accordingly, we are not expressing any opinion as to the accuracy or acceptability of any calculations or other material submitted with your request. Please note that this letter addresses only issues arising under section 430 of the Code and the approval granted herein should not be read to imply that the Plan as it stands satisfies the requirements of other sections of the Code.

Effective with the plan year that began in 2006, the Employer elected frozen airline plan funding relief under section 402(a)(1) of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (“PPA ’06”). Then on December 13, 2007, a law was enacted that allowed all pilots who reach age 60 on or after that date to continue flying until age 65. The proposed change in assumptions are in response to a subsequent study of pilot demographic experience from 2008 through 2012 completed in September 2013 by the plan's actuary, further supplemented with pilot retirement rates for 2013. These proposed changes in assumptions would reduce the Plan's funding shortfall by more than $50 million, consequently approval is required pursuant to section 430(h)(5) of the Code.

¹ Similar provisions appear in 412(c)(5)(B) of the Code prior to amendment by the PPA ’06. ² Similar provisions appear in 302(c)(5)(B) of ERISA prior to amendment by the PPA ’06.

201538029

Section 430(h)(5) of the Code, provides that no actuarial assumption may be changed that results in a decrease in the funding shortfall³ of the plan for the current plan year that exceeds $50 million, or that exceeds $5 million and is 5 percent or more of the funding target⁴ of the plan before such change, without approval from the Secretary.

This approval applies solely to the following revised assumptions used under the plan.

(1) The revised form of payment for retirement-eligible active participants assumptions are as follows:

95.00% elect a lump sum form of payment
3.25% elect a life annuity
0.75% elect a 50% joint and survivor annuity
1.00% elect a 100% joint and survivor annuity

(2) The revised rates of retirement are shown in the following table:

Age Rate
50 — 54 1%
55 — 59 1%

60 10%
61 5%
62 — 64 5%
65 100%

When filing Form 5500 for the Plan Year Beginning in 2013, enter on an attachment to the Schedule B (Actuarial Information) the date of this letter and label the attachment “Schedule B, line 11 - Change in Actuarial Assumptions Approval Date.”

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact of our office (ID# )at() -

Sincerely yours,

David M. Ziegler, Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 2

³ As defined in section 430(c)(4) of the Code.
⁴ As defined in section 430(d) of the Code.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace