Private Letter Ruling 201537033 Released September 11, 2015 Approved Transcribed from scan

Caregiving crisis supports late IRA rollover waiver

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A married couple took money from the husband's IRA for a family home purchase and planned to replace it with insurance-policy loan proceeds. The proceeds reached their checking account within the 60-day rollover period, but the couple did not notice the deposit until a week after the deadline. During the rollover period, the wife was spending extensive time caring for her mother, who had late-stage Alzheimer's disease, moving her from an unsafe facility, attending medical appointments, and filing a complaint with state authorities. The IRS found those circumstances consistent with an event beyond the taxpayers' reasonable control and waived the 60-day requirement, subject to all other rollover rules.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer receive a waiver after missing the 60-day IRA rollover deadline during a family caregiving crisis?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3)(I); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

JUN 18 2015

201537033

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

SE:TEP:RA:TJ

Legend

Taxpayer A =

Taxpayer B =

IRA C =

Account D =

Financial Institution E =
Financial Institution F =
State X =

Amount 1 =

Amount 2 =

Amount 3 =

Amount 4 =

2
201537033

Dear

This is in response to your letter dated February 11, 2015, in which you request a
waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayer B represents that on September 18, 2014, she requested a distribution
of Amount 1 from her husband’s IRA, IRA C, an individual retirement account
described in section 408(a) of the Code. Taxpayer B asserts that her failure to
accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by 408(d)(3)(A) was
due to caring for her mother who was seriously ill during the rollover period.

Taxpayer A was the owner of IRA C, which was maintained by Financial
Institution E. Taxpayer B is the spouse of Taxpayer A and handles all of the
family’s finances. Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B file their federal Income Tax
Return jointly.

On September 18, 2014, Taxpayer B requested a distribution of Amount 1 from
IRA C to cover a down payment on a home for Taxpayer A’s and Taxpayer B’s
son. At the time of the distribution, Financial Institution E advised Taxpayer B
that if she “linked” IRA C to Taxpayer A’s and Taxpayer B’s checking account,
Account D, Amount 1 could be rolled back into IRA C directly from Account D.
Account D is a non-IRA account maintained by Financial Institution F. On
September 22, 2014, Amount 1 was deposited into Account D.

On August 11, 2014, Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B liquidated the trust that held
their life insurance policies. They had been trying for years to change the
ownership of the policies due to high annual fees. On August 5, 2014, the courts
approved the ownership change. On November 10, 2014, Taxpayer A and
Taxpayer B requested loans from their insurance policies totaling Amount 2. On
November 18, 2014, a date within the 60-day rollover period, Amount 2 was
deposited by the insurance company directly into Account D. However,
Taxpayer A did not realize that Amount 2 had been deposited into Account D
until November 25, 2014, approximately a week after the expiration of the 60-day
period. Taxpayer A tried to deposit Amount 1 into IRA C on this date via next
day mail; however, Financial Institution E would not accept the attempted rollover
back into IRA C.

From September 1 through the end of November, 2014, Taxpayer B was trying to
care for her mother who suffers from late stage Alzheimer’s disease, which had
been initially diagnosed in 2012. From August through October 4, 2014,
Taxpayer B, who worked full time, was spending 8 hours a day with her mother
due to inadequate care of and frequent injuries sustained by her mother at the

3
201537033

memory care unit where her mother resided. Her mother was not being fed, her
medications were not properly given, and she was left soiled and unattended in
her bed. On September 29, 2014, her mother fell while trying to get out of bed
resulting in a severe head injury, and she fell again three hours later while being
left to walk alone. On October 4, 2014, Taxpayer B moved her mother to a small
group home where she could receive competent care. Because the move was
stressful for her mother and her mother was new to the home, Taxpayer B
needed to monitor her mother’s behavior. Between transitioning her mother to
the new facility, taking her to doctors’ appointments to adjust her medications,
and filing a complaint with the State X Department of Health Services against the
prior facility, Taxpayer B did not monitor Account D for the deposit of Amount 2.
For this reason, she did not attempt to roll over Amount 1 back into IRA C until
November 25, 2014, a week after the expiration of the 60-day rollover period.
However, the balance in Account D on November 18, 2014, was equal to Amount
4, an amount that exceeded Amount 1.

Based on the above facts and representations, Taxpayer A requests that the
Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of
Amount 1 from IRA C.

Section 408(a) of the Code defines an IRA to mean a trust created or organized
in the United States, and requires that the trustee be a bank or an approved non-
bank trustee.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in
section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in
gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner
provided under section 72.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) does not apply
to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if:

(i) the entire amount received (including money or any other property) is
paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after
the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into
such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible
in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).

4
201537033

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply
to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from
an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt
such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i)
from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application
of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for
partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section
408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary of the Treasury may
waive the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D)
where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good
conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable
control of the individual subject to such requirement.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, provides that the Service will issue a
ruling waiving the 60-day rollover requirement in cases where the failure to waive
such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster or other events beyond the reasonable control of the taxpayer.
In determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant
facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution;
(2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization,
incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the
use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,
whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution
occurred.

The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A and
Taxpayer B are consistent with Taxpayer B’s assertion that the failure to
complete a rollover of the distribution of Amount 1 from IRA C was due to
Taxpayer B’s caring for her mother who was seriously ill during the 60-day
rollover period.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service waives the
60-day rollover period with respect to Amount 1. Provided all other requirements
of section 408(d)(3), except the 60-day requirement, were met with respect to the
contribution of Amount 1 to IRA C, the contribution of this amount is considered a
rollover contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3).

5
201537033

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 408(a)(6) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations
which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact
. Please address all correspondence to

Sincerely yours,

Carlton A. Watkins

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Notice of Intention to Disclose
Deleted copy of this letter

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.