Private Letter Ruling 201537032 Released September 11, 2015 Approved Transcribed from scan

Adviser and custodian errors support late Roth IRA rollover

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer tried to move a Roth IRA into a self-directed Roth IRA so it could invest in a limited liability company. His adviser misread the new custodian's forms and directed the funds into a non-Roth account, while the existing custodian also treated the transfer as a rollover on Form 1099-R. The money remained unused, and the adviser accepted responsibility for the missed 60-day deadline. The IRS waived the deadline because of the adviser and financial institution errors and gave the taxpayer 60 days from the ruling to contribute the amount to a Roth IRA.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer receive a waiver after adviser and custodian errors sent Roth IRA funds to the wrong account?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 408(d)(3)(I), 408A; Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

201537032

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

JUN 18 2015

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
T:EP:RA:T1
Legend
Taxpayer A =
Roth IRA B =
Account C =

Financial Institution D =
State E =
Financial Advisor E =

Amount 1 =

Dear

This is in response to your request dated November 6, 2014, as supplemented
by correspondence dated April 15, 2015, and May 13, 2015, in which you request
a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayer A represents that he received a distribution equal to Amount 1 from
Roth IRA B, which was maintained by Financial Institution D. Taxpayer A asserts
that his failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by

2
201537032

408(d)(3)(A) of the Code was due to financial institution error and incorrect
advice from Taxpayer A’s financial advisor, Financial Advisor E.

Taxpayer A maintained Roth IRA B with Financial Institution D. Taxpayer A
wanted to invest the assets of Roth IRA B in a limited liability company he formed
under the laws of State E. Because Financial Institution D did not permit self-
directed investments, Taxpayer A contacted another IRA custodian to set up a
self-directed Roth IRA account. Taxpayer A’s Financial Advisor E misinterpreted
the forms supplied by the prospective self-directed Roth IRA custodian and
believed that the rollover could be made to, and held indefinitely in, Account C, a
non-Roth IRA account maintained by Financial Institution D. On August 7, 2012,
the funds in Roth IRA B, equal to Amount 1, were transferred to Account C rather
than a self-directed Roth IRA account. Financial Institution D also misunderstood
the process and used Code G (rollovers) on the Form 1099-R in reporting the
transfer of Amount 1 from Roth IRA B to Account C, both of which were
maintained by Financial Institution D.

Taxpayer A represents that Amount 1 has not been used for any other purpose.
Taxpayer A submitted a letter from Financial Advisor E stating that he was
responsible for the failure to satisfy the 60-day rollover requirement with respect
to the distribution of Amount 1.

Based on the above facts and representations, Taxpayer A requests that the
Service waive the 60-day rollover period under section 408(d)(3) of the Code with
respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from Roth IRA B.

Section 408(a) of the Code defines an IRA to mean a trust created or organized
in the United States, and requires that the trustee be a bank or an approved non-
bank trustee.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in
section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in
gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner
provided under section 72.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) does not apply
to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if:

(i) the entire amount received (including money or any other property) is
paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after
the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

3
201537032

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into
such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible
in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply
to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from
an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt
such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i)
from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application
of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for
partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section
408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary of the Treasury may
waive the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D)
where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good
conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable
control of the individual subject to such requirement.

Section 408A(c)(6) of the Code provides that no rollover contribution may be
made to a Roth IRA unless it is a qualified rollover contribution.

Section 408A(e)(1) of the Code provides that the term "qualified rollover
contribution" means a rollover contribution to a Roth IRA from another such
account, or from an individual retirement plan, but only if such rollover
contribution meets the requirements of section 408(d)(3).

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, provides that the Service will issue a
ruling waiving the 60-day rollover requirement in cases where the failure to waive
such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster or other events beyond the reasonable control of the taxpayer.
In determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant
facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution;
(2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization,
incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the
use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,
whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution
occurred.

4
201537032

The Service has the authority to waive the 60-day rollover requirement where the
individual failed to complete a rollover to another IRA within the 60-day rollover
period because of one of the factors enumerated in Rev. Proc. 2003-16, for
example, errors committed by a financial institution, death, hospitalization, postal
error, incarceration, and/or disability.

The information and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A are consistent with
his assertion that the failure to accomplish a rollover of Amount 1 from Roth IRA
B into another Roth IRA within the 60-day period prescribed by 408(d)(3)(A) of
the Code was due to financial institution error on the part of Financial Institution
D and incorrect advice from Taxpayer A’s financial advisor.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby
waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount
1 from Roth IRA B. Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance
of this ruling letter to contribute Amount 1 into a Roth IRA. Provided all other
requirements of section 408(d)(3), except the 60-day requirement, are met with
respect to such contributions, Amount 1 will be considered a rollover contribution
within the meaning of section 408(d)(3).

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations
which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact
at . Please address all correspondence to

Sincerely yours,

Carlton A. Watkins

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Notice of Intention to Disclose
Deleted copy of this letter

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.