Private Letter Ruling 201537017 Released September 11, 2015 Approved

Taxpayer receives 60 days to elect out of bonus depreciation

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A foreign corporate taxpayer placed qualified property in service but filed its income tax return late after an unusual series of events prevented a timely extension request. Its late return included a statement electing out of additional first-year depreciation under section 168(k). The IRS found that the taxpayer satisfied the standards for regulatory-election relief. It granted 60 days to make the election by filing an amended return with the required statement, but did not extend the deadlines for the original return or extension form.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer receive extra time to elect out of section 168(k) additional first-year depreciation?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 168(k); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168(k)-1(e), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201537017 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/11/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.04-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------------------- ------------------, ID No. ------------------
-------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
----------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:7
PLR-146119-14
Date:
June 03, 2015

Re: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Taxpayer = ---------------------------------------------------------------
A = ------------
Date1 = ---------------------------

Dear --------------------:

    This ruling responds to a letter dated December 18, 2014, submitted by Taxpayer

requesting an extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the election not to deduct the
additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code)
for all qualified property placed in service in the taxable year ended Date1.

FACTS

     Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:

    Taxpayer is the common parent of a multinational group of companies, and it

files Form 1120-F, U.S. Income Tax Return of a Foreign Corporation, on a calendar-
year basis. The multinational group designs, manufactures and distributes A via
wholesale, retail, and e-commerce throughout the world. Taxpayer placed in service
qualified property (as defined in § 168(k)(2)) during the taxable year ended Date1.

   Due to an unusual series of events, Taxpayer failed to file timely a Form 7004,

Application for Automatic Extension of Time to File Certain Business Income Tax,
Information, and Other Returns, requesting an extension of time to file Form 1120-F for
the taxable year ended Date1. As a result, Taxpayer filed untimely Form 1120-F,
including the election statement not to claim the additional first year depreciation
PLR-146119-14 2

deduction under § 168(k)(1) or § 168(k)(5) for qualified property placed in service during
the taxable year, for the taxable year ended Date1.

   Taxpayer was not aware that its Form 7004 had not been filed timely until it

received a notice from the Internal Revenue Service indicating that Taxpayer did not
timely file Forms 5472, Information Return of a 25% Foreign-Owned U.S. Corporation or
a Foreign Corporation Engaged in a U.S. Trade or Business, for the taxable year ended
Date1. Upon receiving this notice, Taxpayer promptly filed this request to obtain an
extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to file the election not to
deduct the additional first year depreciation under §§ 168(k)(1) and 168(k)(5).

RULING REQUESTED

  Taxpayer requests an extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and

301.9100-3 to file the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under
§ 168(k)(1) and § 168(k)(5) for all qualified property placed in service during the taxable
year ended Date1.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 168(k)(1) provides a 50-percent additional first year depreciation

deduction for qualified property (i) acquired by a taxpayer after December 31, 2007, and
before January 1, 2015, and (ii) placed in service by the taxpayer before January 1,
2015 (or January 1, 2016, for qualified property described in § 168(k)(2)(B) or (C).
Section 168(k)(5) provides a 100-percent additional first year depreciation deduction for
qualified property acquired by a taxpayer after September 8, 2010, and before January
1, 2012, and placed in service by the taxpayer before January 1, 2012 (or January 1,
2013, for qualified property described in § 168(k)(2)(B) or (C)). See section 3 of Rev.
Proc. 2011-26, 2011-16, I.R.B. 664, 665.

    Section 168(k)(2)(D)(iii) provides that a taxpayer may elect not to deduct the

additional first year depreciation for any class of property placed in service during the
taxable year. The term “class of property” is defined in § 1.168(k)-1(e)(2) of the Income
Tax Regulations as meaning, in general, each class of property described in § 168(e)
(for example, 5-year property). See section 5.01 of Rev. Proc. 2008-54, 2008-2 C.B.
722 and section 3.01 of Rev. Proc. 2011-26 (rules similar to the rules in § 1.168(k)-1 for
“qualified property” or for “30-percent additional first year depreciation deduction” apply
for purposes of § 168(k) as currently in effect).

   Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(1) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation for a class of property applies to all qualified property that is in that
class of property and placed in service in the same taxable year.
PLR-146119-14 3

   Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(i) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation must be made by the due date (including extensions) of the federal
tax return for the taxable year in which the property is placed in service by the taxpayer.

   Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(ii) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation must be made in the manner prescribed on Form 4562, “Depreciation
and Amortization,” and its instructions. The instructions to Form 4562 for the taxable
year ended Date1 provide that the election not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation is made by attaching a statement to the taxpayer’s timely filed tax return
indicating that the taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional first year depreciation
and the class of property for which the taxpayer is making the election.

   Under § 301.9100-1, the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable

extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

    Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

CONCLUSIONS

    Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the

requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted 60 calendar days from the date of this letter to make the election
not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) for all classes of
property placed in service during the taxable year ended Date1 that qualify for additional
first year depreciation. The election must be made by Taxpayer filing an amended
federal tax return for that taxable year, with a statement indicating that Taxpayer is
electing not to deduct the additional first year depreciation for all classes of property
placed in service during that taxable year.

   Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the

federal income tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provisions of the Code (including other subsections of § 168). Specifically, no opinion is
expressed or implied on whether any item of depreciable property placed in service
during the taxable year ended Date1 is eligible for the additional first year depreciation
PLR-146119-14 4

deduction. Also, we emphasize that this letter ruling does not grant any extension of
time for the filing of Taxpayer’s Form 7004 or its Form 1120-F for the taxable year
ended Date1.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

  In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending a copy of this letter to

Taxpayer’s authorized representative. We are also sending a copy of this letter to the
appropriate Industry Director, Large Business & International Division (LB&I).

                                             Sincerely,

                                             WILLIE E. ARMSTRONG, JR.

                                             WILLIE E. ARMSTRONG, JR.
                                             Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 7
                                             Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                             (Income Tax and Accounting)

Enclosures (2):
copy of this letter
copy for section 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.