Private Letter Ruling 201537009 Released September 11, 2015 Approved

Foreign insurer receives 60 days for domestic-corporation election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A regulated foreign insurance company intended to elect domestic-corporation treatment under section 953(d). Its accounting firm prepared the election statement, but a management firm failed to file it as instructed even though the taxpayer timely filed its return with a copy. The IRS found that the taxpayer satisfied the good-faith and government-prejudice standards. It granted 60 days to make the election under Revenue Procedure 2003-47, without deciding whether the insurer otherwise qualified.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the foreign insurer receive additional time to make its section 953(d) election?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 953(d), 6072(b); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2003-47

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201537009 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/11/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 953.06-00, 9100.22-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------- ------------------, ID No. --------------
------------------ Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------ CC:INTL:B02
PLR-105010-15
Date:
June 10, 2015

              TY: -------

LEGEND:

Taxpayer: ------------------
-----------------------
Year 1: -------
Country X: -----------------------
Accounting Firm: ------------------------------
Date 1: -----------------
Management Firm: ----------------------------------

Dear ------------------:

   This is in response to a letter received by our office on February 11, 2015,

submitted on behalf of Taxpayer by its authorized representative, requesting an
extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make the election provided by
section 953(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to be treated as a domestic
corporation for U.S. tax purposes commencing on the first day of Taxpayer’s Year 1
taxable year.

  The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations

submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information,
representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit process.
PLR-105010-15 2

   Taxpayer is a regulated insurance company organized under the laws of Country

X. Taxpayer intended to make a section 953(d) election in order to be treated as a
domestic corporation. Taxpayer engaged the services of Accounting Firm to prepare
the section 953(d) election statement. Accounting Firm prepared and forwarded the
section 953(d) election statement to Management Firm on Date 1. Accounting Firm
specifically instructed Management Firm to file the section 953(d) election statement
with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) office in Plantation, Florida. However,
Management Firm failed to file the section 953(d) election statement. Thereafter,
Taxpayer timely filed its federal income tax return along with a copy of the election
statement for Year 1. Taxpayer has represented that the grant of relief would not
prejudice the interests of the Government because it will not result in a lower tax liability
for taxable years affected by the election.

  Taxpayer has provided an affidavit representing that it exclusively relied on

Management Firm to file the section 953(d) election statement with the IRS and
Management Firm failed to do so. Taxpayer has also provided an affidavit by
Management Firm corroborating the events that led to the failure of a timely filed section
953(d) election statement.

    Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to

grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg.
§ 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Code, except
subtitles E, G, H, and I.

     Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b) provides that an election includes an application for

relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date
is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.

    Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this

section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits
described in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

    Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that except as provided in paragraphs

(b)(3)(i) through (iii) of that section, a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and
in good faith if it meets one of the conditions described in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-
3(b)(1)(i) through (v). One such condition is that that taxpayer reasonably relied on a
qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and
the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make the election. Treas.
Reg. § 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v). Treas. Reg. § 301-9100-3(b)(3)(i) through (iii) does not
apply to the facts as presented in this request.
PLR-105010-15 3

   Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(b)(2) provides that a taxpayer is not considered to

have reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional if taxpayer knew or should have
known that the professional was not competent to render advice on the regulatory
election or was not aware of all relevant facts.

   Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that relief will be granted only when the

interests of the Government will not be prejudiced.

    Rev. Proc. 2003-47, 2003-2 C.B. 55, 56 provides that the election to be treated

as a domestic corporation under section 953(d), to be effective for a taxable year, must
be filed by the due date prescribed in section 6072(b) (with extensions) for the United
States income tax return that is due if the election becomes effective.

   In the present situation, Rev. Proc. 2003-47 fixes the time to make the election

under section 953(d). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that
Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

    Based on the facts and information submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer

satisfies Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of
time of 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to make the election provided by
section 953(d), in accordance with the procedural rules set forth in Rev. Proc. 2003-47,
to be treated as a domestic corporation for federal income tax purposes commencing on
the first day of Taxpayer's Year 1 taxable year.

  The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is

otherwise eligible to make the section 953(d) election. Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a).

   The Taxpayer should attach a copy of this letter ruling to its federal income tax

return for the relevant year.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

   Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is

being furnished to your authorized representative.

                                                Sincerely,


                                                Jeffery G. Mitchell
                                                Branch Chief, Branch 2
                                                (International)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.