Offsite solar-array ownership qualifies for residential energy credit
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A homeowner purchased solar panels and a share of related equipment in a ground-mounted offsite array. All electricity entered the public utility's grid, and the utility applied the homeowner's share of net-metering credits against electricity used at the residence. Expected production generally would not exceed the home's consumption. The IRS ruled that the panel, equipment, and installation costs were qualified solar electric property expenditures and allowed a section 25D credit equal to 30 percent of those costs for the installation year.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Do a homeowner's offsite solar panels and related equipment qualify for the section 25D residential solar credit?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC § 25D(a), (d), and (e); Notice 2013-70, Q&A 26
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201536017 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/4/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 25D.00-00
Person To Contact:
----------------- --------------------------, ID No. -----------
---------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------- --------------------
Refer Reply To:
In Re: --------------------------------------------------- CC:PSI:B6
-------------------- PLR-111860-15
Date:
July 28, 2015
LEGEND:
Taxpayer = ------------------
-----------------------
State = -----------
Public Utility = ------------------------------
Year = ------
Date = --------------------
LLC 1 = ----------------------------------------------------------------
LLC 2 = ----------------------------------------
a = ---
b = -----------
c = ---
Dear -----------:
This letter is in response to your letter dated Date and subsequent correspondence
submitted by your authorized representatives, requesting rulings under § 25D of the
Internal Revenue Code.
PLR-111860-15 2
The facts and representations submitted are as follows:
Taxpayer, an individual, is a resident of State. Taxpayer uses the cash method of
accounting and is a calendar year taxpayer.
In Year, Taxpayer purchased a solar photovoltaic panels from LLC 1. The solar panels
are placed on a ground-mounted, offsite solar array located in State. The array includes
other solar photovoltaic panels that are owned by other individuals. Taxpayer also
purchased a partial ownership in racking equipment, inverter equipment, and wiring and
other equipment and installation services required for the integration of the panels in the
array and the interconnection of the array to Public Utility’s electric distribution system.
Taxpayer paid $b for the panels and the related equipment and installation services.
Taxpayer and the other owners are the initial owners of the array and related
equipment, and LLC 1 completed installation of the array in Year.
All of the electricity that Taxpayer’s solar panels and the array generate is delivered to
Public Utility. Taxpayer is a customer of Public Utility. Pursuant to the terms of Public
Utility’s tariff, Public Utility calculates a net metering credit based on the aggregate
amount of electricity delivered to Public Utility from the solar array. Public Utility then
applies a portion of that net metering credit against amounts due from Taxpayer for
Public Utility’s provision of electric services to Taxpayer’s residence.
Taxpayer and LLC 1 estimate that Taxpayer’s solar panels will produce approximately
c% of the aggregate amount of electricity that Taxpayer consumes at Taxpayer’s
residence. Accordingly, Taxpayer and LLC 1 expect that Taxpayer’s net metering credit
generally will not offset more than the amounts that Taxpayer owes Public Utility for the
provision of electric service to Taxpayer’s residence.
Taxpayer and each of the other owners of the solar panels included in the array are
members of LLC 2. LLC 2 does not hold any ownership interest in Taxpayer’s panels,
the array, or any of the related equipment or wiring. LLC 2 was formed to represent the
common interests of its members in managing certain administrative and financial
matters in connection with ownership of the panels included in the array. LLC 2 also
communicates with Public Utility to provide the information Public Utility needs to
calculate the net metering credit allocable to Taxpayer’s and the other owners’
respective Public Utility accounts.
Taxpayer believes that the costs related to the purchase of a solar panels are
eligible for an income tax credit under § 25D. Therefore, Taxpayer plans to claim
an income tax credit in an amount equal to 30% of the $b purchase price in Year.
Accordingly, you requested the following rulings:
-
The $b purchase price constitutes a “qualified solar electric property
PLR-111860-15 3expenditure” as defined under § 25D(d)(2) of the Code for Year; and
-
Taxpayer shall be allowed a credit against the income tax imposed under
Chapter 1 of Subtitle A of the Code for Year in an amount equal to 30% of
the $b purchase price.Law and Analysis
Section 25D(a)(1) of the Code allows an individual a credit against the income tax
imposed for the taxable year in an amount equal to 30% of the qualified solar electric
property expenditures made by the taxpayer during such year.
Section 25D(d)(2) defines the term “qualified solar electric property expenditure” as an
expenditure for property which uses solar energy to generate electricity for use in a
dwelling unit located in the United States and used as a residence by the taxpayer.
Section 25D(e)(1) allows the expenditures for labor costs properly allocable to the
onsite preparation, assembly, or original installation of the qualified solar electric
property and for piping or wiring to interconnect such property to the dwelling unit to be
taken into account for purposes of § 25D.
Under § 25D(e)(8)(A), generally, for purposes of determining the tax year when the
credit is allowed, an expenditure with respect to an item shall be treated as made when
the original installation of the item is completed.
Section 5.02, Q&A No. 26, of Notice 2013-70, 2013-47 I.R.B. 528, provides that under
certain circumstances, a purchase of solar panels that are placed on an off-site solar
array may meet the definition of qualified solar electric property expenditures for
purposes of § 25D.
In the current situation, Taxpayer represents that Public Utility supplies electricity
to Taxpayer’s residence located in State and Taxpayer’s off-site solar panels
provide electricity exclusively to Public Utility’s electrical grid. Public Utility
provides Taxpayer with a credit against Taxpayer’s utility account in accordance
with the net metering arrangement described above in this ruling. Furthermore,
the solar panels are not expected to generate electricity in excess of the amount
of electricity that will be consumed at Taxpayer’s residence.
Accordingly, based solely upon the facts submitted and representations made, we
conclude that Taxpayer’s expenditure for the solar panels and the related equipment
and installation services mentioned in this ruling constitute a “qualified solar electric
property expenditure” under § 25D(d)(2), and Taxpayer is eligible to claim an income
tax credit under § 25D in an amount equal to 30% of such expenditure in Year.
PLR-111860-15 4
We based the rulings contained in this letter upon information and representations
submitted by your representatives and accompanied by penalties of perjury statements
executed by you. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Except as specifically set forth above, we express or imply no opinion regarding the tax
consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this
letter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
We are sending a copy of this letter ruling to the appropriate Small Business/Self-
Employed Division office. In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this
office, we are also sending a copy of this letter ruling to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Jaime C. Park
Chief, Branch 6
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosure (1):
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.