Private Letter Ruling 201535028 Released August 28, 2015 Approved Transcribed from scan

Erroneous custodian advice supports IRA rollover waiver

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An IRA owner withdrew funds to buy private-company stock after relying on a custodian's prior instructions for a similar investment. When the custodian refused the new stock, its adviser told the owner that having the certificate titled to the IRA was enough and no further rollover step was needed. The owner later received a notice of deficiency. The IRS found the missed deadline resulted from erroneous financial-institution advice, waived the 60-day rule, and granted 60 days from the ruling to contribute the amount to a rollover IRA.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the IRS waive the 60-day IRA rollover deadline when the taxpayer relied on erroneous advice from the IRA custodian's adviser?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 72, 408(d)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

201535028

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

JUN 01 2015

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

T:EP:RA:T3

Legend:
Taxpayer A =
Individual B =

IRA X =

Financial Institution C =

Company D =
Company E =

Amount 1 =

Dear:

This is in response to your request dated September 17, 2014, as supplemented by
correspondence dated November 25, 2014, December 2, 2014, and December 12,
2014, submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative, in which you request
a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested.

2

201535028

Taxpayer A represents that on May 23, 2011, he received a distribution from IRA X
totaling Amount 1 from Financial Institution C. Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to
accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the
Code was due to his reliance on erroneous advice given to him by Individual B of
Financial Institution C.

In 2008, Taxpayer A invested a portion of IRA X in Company D stock. Prior to engaging
in the transaction, Taxpayer A consulted with Financial Institution C, his IRA custodian,
and attempted to structure the investment so that it would not result in a taxable
distribution from IRA X. A Financial Institution C financial advisor told Taxpayer A to
take a distribution from IRA X, purchase Company D stock, and then return the
purchased Company D stock as an investment in IRA X within 60-days of the
distribution. Taxpayer A followed these instructions and completed the investment and
Company D stock was held through IRA X.

In 2011, Taxpayer A sought to make an investment through IRA X similar to the
successful investment he had made in 2008.

On May 23, 2011, Taxpayer A took a distribution of Amount 1 from IRA X and
purchased Company E stock. On June 30, 2011, Company E issued the stock
certificate designating Taxpayer A’s IRA as owner of the shares. On July 2, 2011,
Taxpayer A delivered the stock certificate to Individual B. Taxpayer A relied on the
advice of Individual B that the distribution of Amount 1 and its investment in Company E
stock would not be treated as a taxable distribution and the investment would be
accepted by Financial Institution C as an investment in IRA X. However, Financial
Institution C refused to accept Company E stock as an investment in IRA X due to
Company F’s change in it’s market capitalization requirements. Taxpayer A then asked
Individual B how to proceed. Individual B advised Taxpayer A that since the stock
certificate was titled as Taxpayer A’s IRA, Taxpayer A would not have a problem with
the 60-day rollover requirement and further advised Taxpayer A to keep the Company E
stock certificate in a safe place. Relying on Individual B’s advice Taxpayer A believed
no further steps were needed to comply with the 60-day rollover requirement.

In March 2012, when preparing Taxpayer A’s 2011 federal tax return, his certified public
accountant asked Taxpayer A whether he had taken a distribution from IRA X.
Taxpayer A explained his investment in Company E stock and asserted that the

May 23, 2011, distribution of Amount 1 was not taxable. In October 2013, Taxpayer A
received a Notice of Deficiency from the Service.

Based on the above facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal
Revenue Service (“Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section
408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to the distribution of Amount 1.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income

3

201535028

by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section
72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if—

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the
day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into
such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible
in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any
amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at
any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual
received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was
not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d)
do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Revenue Procedure 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to
section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to
complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions
imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the use of the amount distributed (for

4 201535028

example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed), and (4) the
time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent
with his assertion that his failure to accomplish a timely rollover of Amount 1 was due to
his reliance on erroneous advice given to him by Individual B of Financial Institution C.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the
60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from IRA X.
Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to
contribute Amount 1 into a rollover IRA. Provided all other requirements of section
408(d)(3) of the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such
contribution, Amount 1 will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of
section 408(d)(3) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be
applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter ruling has been sent to your authorized representative pursuant to a
power of attorney on file in this office.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact at ( ) . Please
address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T1.

Sincerely yours,

[signature]

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.