Using 401(k) funds to avoid foreclosure did not excuse late rollovers
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An individual took distributions from two 401(k) accounts while she and her spouse faced medical and financial difficulties. She used the money to pay a second mortgage and avoid foreclosure, then replaced part of the distributions in two rollover IRAs after her spouse obtained a cash advance. The IRS found no evidence connecting the late rollovers to the waiver factors in Revenue Procedure 2003-16. It characterized the transaction as a short-term loan and concluded that the taxpayer assumed the risk that the funds would not be returned within 60 days. The IRS denied the waiver, so the late IRA contributions were not valid rollovers.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could financial and medical hardship excuse late rollovers after 401(k) distributions were used to prevent foreclosure?
- Outcome: Denied
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(9), 402(c); Rev. Proc. 2003-16
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
MAY 22 2015
Uniform Issue List: 402.00-00
T:EP:RA:T2
Legend:
Taxpayer A =
401(k) Account B =
401(k) Account C =
IRA D =
IRA E =
Amount 1 =
Amount 2 =
Amount 3 =
Amount 4 =
Dear
This is in response to your request dated January 17, 2014, as supplemented by
correspondence dated August 10, September 23 and November 5, 2014, and January
7, 2015, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in
section 402(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested:
2
Taxpayer A, represents that she received distributions from 401(k) Account B and
401(k) Account C totaling Amount 1 and Amount 2, respectively. Taxpayer A asserts
that her failure to accomplish a rollover of Amount 3 (a portion of Amount 1) and
Amount 4 (a portion of Amount 2) within the 60-day period prescribed by section
402(c)(3) was due to her temporary use of the funds because of medical and financial
difficulties which delayed the rollover of the funds into IRA D and IRA E.
Taxpayer A maintained 401(k) Account B and 401(k) Account C. In late 2009, Taxpayer
A and her spouse were experiencing financial difficulties due to medical issues. As a
result of these difficulties Taxpayer A took a distribution of Amount 1 from 401(k)
Account B on December 28, 2009 and Amount 2 from 401(k) Account C on December
31, 2009. Taxpayer A used the funds to pay off a second mortgage to avoid
foreclosure. In March 2010, Taxpayer A’s spouse was able to obtain a cash advance
from his employer. On March 9, 2010, Taxpayer A deposited Amount 3 into rollover
IRA D and on March 12, 2010, deposited Amount 4 into rollover IRA E. Both of these
deposits were after the 60-day period had expired.
Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue
Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount
3 from 401(k) Account B and Amount 4 from 401(k) Account C.
Section 402(c) of the Code provides that if any portion of the balance to the credit of an
employee in a qualified trust is paid to the employee in an eligible rollover distribution,
and the distributee transfers any portion of the property received in such distribution to
an eligible retirement plan, and in the case of a distribution of property other than
money, the amount so transferred consists of the property distributed, then such
distribution (to the extent transferred) shall not be includible in gross income for the
taxable year in which paid. Section 402(c)(3)(A) states that such rollover must be
accomplished within 60 days following the day on which the distributee received the
property.
Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that the Secretary may
waive the 60-day requirement under sections 402(c) where the failure to waive such
requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or
other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such
requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for
the waiver under section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code.
Section 402(c)(4) of the Code provides that an eligible rollover distribution shall not
include any distribution to the extent such distribution is required under section
401(a)(9).
Section 402(c)(8) of the Code provides that an individual retirement account (IRA) is
one type of eligible retirement plan.
Revenue Procedure 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, (January 27, 2003), provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to
section 402(c)(3) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and
3
circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to
complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions
imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for
example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the
time elapsed since the distribution occurred.
Taxpayer A has not presented any evidence to the Service as to how any of the factors
outlined in Rev. Proc. 2003-16 affected her ability to timely roll over the distributions of
Amount 3 of 401(k) Account B and Amount 4 of 401(k) Account C to an IRA. Taxpayer
A has stated that the distributions were used to pay off a second mortgage and the
delay in the rollover of Amount 3 and Amount 4 was caused by a delay beyond their
control. In essence, Taxpayer A made a short term loan when she withdrew Amount 1
from 401(k) Account B and Amount 2 from 401(k) Account C and while she had the
intent at the time of withdrawal to redeposit these amounts into an IRA prior to the
expiration of the 60-day rollover period, she assumed the risk that they may not be
returned timely. Therefore, pursuant to section 402(d)(3) of the Code, the Internal
Revenue Service hereby declines to waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect
to the December, 2009, distributions to Taxpayer A of Amount 1 and Amount 2.
Thus, the contributions of Amount 3 into IRA D on March 12, 2010, and Amount 4 into
IRA E on March 9, 2010, which Taxpayer A deposited back into IRAs after the
expiration of the 60-day period, will not be considered valid rollovers because the 60-
day requirement under section 402(d)(3) of the Code with respect to such contributions
was not satisfied.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be
applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter has been sent to your authorized representative in accordance with
a power of attorney on file in this office.
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact
Please address all correspondence to
SE:T:EP:RA:T1.
Sincerely,
Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
Enclosures:
4
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
CC:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.