Using 401(k) funds to avoid foreclosure did not excuse late rollovers

Number
201533023
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Taxability of Beneficiary of Employee's Trust (Time and Manner of Taxation)
Code sections
§ 401, § 402, § 6110
Ruling dated
May 22, 2015
Publicly released
August 14, 2015

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An individual took distributions from two 401(k) accounts while she and her spouse faced medical and financial difficulties. She used the money to pay a second mortgage and avoid foreclosure, then replaced part of the distributions in two rollover IRAs after her spouse obtained a cash advance. The IRS found no evidence connecting the late rollovers to the waiver factors in Revenue Procedure 2003-16. It characterized the transaction as a short-term loan and concluded that the taxpayer assumed the risk that the funds would not be returned within 60 days. The IRS denied the waiver, so the late IRA contributions were not valid rollovers.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could financial and medical hardship excuse late rollovers after 401(k) distributions were used to prevent foreclosure?
  • Outcome: Denied
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(9), 402(c); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

MAY 22 2015

Uniform Issue List: 402.00-00

T:EP:RA:T2

Legend:

Taxpayer A =

401(k) Account B =

401(k) Account C =

IRA D =

IRA E =

Amount 1 =

Amount 2 =

Amount 3 =

Amount 4 =

Dear

This is in response to your request dated January 17, 2014, as supplemented by correspondence dated August 10, September 23 and November 5, 2014, and January 7, 2015, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in

section 402(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in support of the ruling requested:

2

Taxpayer A, represents that she received distributions from 401(k) Account B and 401(k) Account C totaling Amount 1 and Amount 2, respectively. Taxpayer A asserts that her failure to accomplish a rollover of Amount 3 (a portion of Amount 1) and Amount 4 (a portion of Amount 2) within the 60-day period prescribed by section 402(c)(3) was due to her temporary use of the funds because of medical and financial difficulties which delayed the rollover of the funds into IRA D and IRA E.

Taxpayer A maintained 401(k) Account B and 401(k) Account C. In late 2009, Taxpayer A and her spouse were experiencing financial difficulties due to medical issues. As a result of these difficulties Taxpayer A took a distribution of Amount 1 from 401(k) Account B on December 28, 2009 and Amount 2 from 401(k) Account C on December 31, 2009. Taxpayer A used the funds to pay off a second mortgage to avoid foreclosure. In March 2010, Taxpayer A’s spouse was able to obtain a cash advance from his employer. On March 9, 2010, Taxpayer A deposited Amount 3 into rollover IRA D and on March 12, 2010, deposited Amount 4 into rollover IRA E. Both of these deposits were after the 60-day period had expired.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 3 from 401(k) Account B and Amount 4 from 401(k) Account C.

Section 402(c) of the Code provides that if any portion of the balance to the credit of an employee in a qualified trust is paid to the employee in an eligible rollover distribution, and the distributee transfers any portion of the property received in such distribution to an eligible retirement plan, and in the case of a distribution of property other than money, the amount so transferred consists of the property distributed, then such distribution (to the extent transferred) shall not be includible in gross income for the taxable year in which paid. Section 402(c)(3)(A) states that such rollover must be accomplished within 60 days following the day on which the distributee received the property.

Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that the Secretary may waive the 60-day requirement under sections 402(c) where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code.

Section 402(c)(4) of the Code provides that an eligible rollover distribution shall not include any distribution to the extent such distribution is required under section 401(a)(9).

Section 402(c)(8) of the Code provides that an individual retirement account (IRA) is one type of eligible retirement plan.

Revenue Procedure 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, (January 27, 2003), provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 402(c)(3) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and

3

circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

Taxpayer A has not presented any evidence to the Service as to how any of the factors outlined in Rev. Proc. 2003-16 affected her ability to timely roll over the distributions of Amount 3 of 401(k) Account B and Amount 4 of 401(k) Account C to an IRA. Taxpayer A has stated that the distributions were used to pay off a second mortgage and the delay in the rollover of Amount 3 and Amount 4 was caused by a delay beyond their control. In essence, Taxpayer A made a short term loan when she withdrew Amount 1 from 401(k) Account B and Amount 2 from 401(k) Account C and while she had the intent at the time of withdrawal to redeposit these amounts into an IRA prior to the expiration of the 60-day rollover period, she assumed the risk that they may not be returned timely. Therefore, pursuant to section 402(d)(3) of the Code, the Internal Revenue Service hereby declines to waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the December, 2009, distributions to Taxpayer A of Amount 1 and Amount 2.

Thus, the contributions of Amount 3 into IRA D on March 12, 2010, and Amount 4 into IRA E on March 9, 2010, which Taxpayer A deposited back into IRAs after the expiration of the 60-day period, will not be considered valid rollovers because the 60-

day requirement under section 402(d)(3) of the Code with respect to such contributions was not satisfied.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter has been sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a power of attorney on file in this office.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T1. Sincerely,

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:

4

Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

CC:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace