Late section 754 election allowed for lower-tier partnership
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An investor acquired an interest in an upper-tier partnership that held an interest in a lower-tier partnership. The upper-tier partnership timely made a section 754 election, but the lower-tier partnership inadvertently did not. Because the optional basis adjustment can apply at both tiers only when both partnerships have elections in effect, the lower-tier partnership requested regulatory relief. The IRS found the extension standards satisfied and granted 120 days to file a written election effective for the missed year and all later years.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the lower-tier partnership make its section 754 basis-adjustment election after the filing deadline?
- Outcome: Approved, with 120 days to file the election
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 743 and 754; Rev. Rul. 87-115; Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201532019
Release Date: 8/7/2015
Third Party Communication: None
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.15-00
Person To Contact:
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:03
PLR-140129-14
Date:
April 21, 2015
X =
P1 =
P2 =
State =
D1 =
D2 =
m =
n =
Dear :
This letter responds to a letter dated October 24, 2014, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of P2, requesting an extension of time under
§ 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an election
under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
The information submitted states that on D1, X acquired a m% interest in P1, a
State limited liability company classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes. P1
owns a n% interest in P2, a State limited liability company classified as a partnership for
federal tax purposes. P1 made an election under § 754 with its partnership return for the
taxable year ended D2. However, P2 inadvertently failed to file an election under § 754
for its taxable year ended D2.
Section 754 provides, in part, that if a partnership files an election, in accordance
with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of the partnership property is
adjusted, in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in
§ 743. Such an election shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the
PLR-140129-14 2
partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year
with respect to which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.
The optional adjustment to basis under § 754 will be available to both an upper-
tier partnership (UTP) and a lower-tier partnership (LTP) when there is a sale or
exchange of a partnership interest or the death of a partner in UTP, and both UTP and
LTP have made an election under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property on a
sale or exchange of a partnership interest or on the death of a partner. Rev. Rul. 87-
115, 1987-2 C.B. 163.
Section 1.754-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that an
election under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under 743(b) with
respect to a transfer of an interest in a partnership, shall be made in a written statement
filed with the partnership return for the taxable year during which the transfer occurs.
For the election to be valid, the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by
§ 1.6031-1(e) (including extensions thereof) for filing the return for the taxable year.
Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory
election” as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the
Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time
for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory
elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Under § 301.9100-3, a
request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including
affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and (2) the
grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied.
As a result, P2 is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to
make an election under § 754 effective for its taxable year ended D2 and thereafter.
The election should be made in a written statement filed with the appropriate service
center for association with P2’s return for its taxable year ended D2. A copy of this letter
should be attached to the election.
Except as specifically set forth above, we express or imply no opinion concerning
PLR-140129-14 3
the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of
the Code and the regulations thereunder.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
This ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office that not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.
In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a
copy of this letter to X’s authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
By:
Mary Beth Carchia
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.