Directed transfers and small businesses cleared for spin-off steps
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A publicly traded parent proposed a series of internal transfers and section 355 distributions to facilitate another company’s acquisition of one business line. The IRS addressed only two discrete issues, not the overall tax treatment of the transaction. It ruled that the cause-to-be-directed transfers would be treated as sequential section 351 stock-for-property exchanges, separate from a related section 368(a)(1)(D) reorganization. It also ruled that the relative fair market values of two business lines would not prevent them from qualifying as active trades or businesses for the three proposed section 355 distributions.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How would the directed transfer steps be treated, and would the relative size of two businesses defeat section 355 active-business status?
- Outcome: Approved on both discrete issues
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 351, 355(b), and 368(a)(1)(D); Rev. Ruls. 77-449 and 2003-51
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201531014 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/31/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 355.03-00, 368.04-00,
351.02-00 Person To Contact:
--------------------------, ID No. ----------------
----------------------- -----------------
-------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------ ----------------------
-------------------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------- CC:CORP:B01
PLR-142820-14
Date:
April 30, 2015
LEGEND
Distributing Parent = ----------------------------------
Distributing 1 = ----------------------------------------
Distributing 2 = ------------------------------------------
Distributing 3 = ---------------------------------------------------
Controlled 1 = ----------------------------------
Controlled 2 = -------------------------
Sub 1 = -------------------------------------------
Sub 2 = --------------------------------------
PLR-142820-14 2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub 3 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FSub 1 = --------------------------------------
FSub 2 = ---------------------------
FSub 3 = ----------------------------------------------------
DE 1 = ------------------------------------------
DE 2 = --------------------------------------------
DE 3 = ------------------------------------------------------
DE 4 = ------------------------------------------------------
DE 5 = ------------------------------
DE 6 = ---------------------------------------------------------
PLR-142820-14 3
PRS = ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acquiring = -------------------------------
Business A = -----------------------------------
Business A1 = -----------------------------------------
Business A1a = -------------------------------------------------
Business B = ---------------------------------------
Business B1 = ----------------------------------------------------
State A = --------------
State B = --------------
State C = --------------
Country A = -------------
Country B = ----------
Country C = -----------------------
Country D = ----------
a = --------
b = --------
c = --
d = --------
e = --------
f = ----
g = ----
h = --
PLR-142820-14 4
i = ----
j = -----
k = ------
l = --
Dear ----------------:
This letter responds to your authorized representatives’ letter dated November 13,
2014, requesting rulings on certain federal income tax consequences of a proposed
transaction (the “Proposed Transaction”). The information provided in that request and
in subsequent correspondence is summarized below.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon facts and representations submitted
by the taxpayer and accompanied by a “penalties of perjury” statement executed by an
appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the materials submitted in support
of the request for rulings. Verification of the facts, representations, and other
information may be required as part of the audit process.
This letter is issued pursuant to section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2015-1, 2015-1 I.R.B. 1,
regarding one or more significant issues under sections 332, 351, 355, 368, or 1036 of
the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). The rulings contained in this letter only
address one or more discrete legal issues involved in the transactions described herein.
This Office expresses no opinion as to the overall tax consequences of these
transactions or as to any issue not specifically addressed by the rulings below.
SUMMARY OF FACTS
Distributing Parent is a publicly traded State A corporation that is the parent of both a
U.S. consolidated group (within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-1(h)) and a
worldwide group of corporations (the “Distributing Parent Worldwide Group”). The
Distributing Parent Worldwide Group operates several distinct business segments,
including Business A and Business B. In turn, Business A and Business B are
comprised of several business lines, including Business A1 and Business B1,
respectively.
Distributing Parent wholly and directly owns Distributing 1, a State A corporation.
Distributing 1 directly owns a percent of the stock of Sub 1 (a State A corporation), b
percent of the stock of Distributing 2 (a State A corporation), and c percent of the stock
of FSub 1 (a Country A entity that is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes). Other members of the Distributing Parent Worldwide Group own d percent
PLR-142820-14 5
of the stock of Sub 1, and Sub 1 owns the remaining e percent of the stock of
Distributing 2. In turn, Distributing 2 wholly and directly owns DE 1 (a State A limited
liability company that is disregarded as an entity separate from Distributing 2 for U.S.
federal income tax purposes). DE 1 directly owns all of the stock of Distributing 3 (a
Country A entity that is treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes) and
the remaining f percent of stock in FSub 1.
Distributing 3 owns a g percent interest in PRS, a Country A arrangement that is treated
as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. FSub 1 owns the remaining h
percent interest in PRS. PRS wholly and directly owns DE 2, which wholly and directly
owns DE 3; each of DE 2 and DE 3 is a Country A entity that is disregarded as an entity
separate from its owner for U.S. federal income tax purposes. After a series of internal
distributions intended to qualify as distributions under section 355 that will occur prior to
the transactions described herein, PRS also will wholly and directly own Controlled 1 (a
state A limited liability company that will elect to be treated as a corporation for U.S.
federal income tax purposes prior to such internal distributions).
Distributing 1 also wholly and directly owns Sub 2 (a State B corporation). Sub 2
directly owns more than i percent of the issued and outstanding stock (by vote and
value) of Sub 3 (a State A corporation), which wholly and directly owns DE 4 (a Country
B entity that is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for U.S. federal income
tax purposes), which wholly and directly owns FSub 2 (a Country C entity that is treated
as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes). FSub 2 wholly and directly
owns DE 5 (a Country C entity that is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner
for U.S. federal income tax purposes).
Distributing 1 also wholly and indirectly owns FSub 3 (a Country D entity that is treated
as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes), which wholly and indirectly owns
DE 6 (a Country D entity that is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for
U.S. federal income tax purposes).
FSub 2 is engaged in Business B1, and DE 6 is engaged in Business A1a (part of
Business A1). Pursuant to the transaction steps described below, Controlled 1 will be
directly and indirectly engaged in Business A1.
PROPOSED TRANSACTION
Distributing Parent is entering into the Proposed Transaction in order to facilitate the
acquisition of Business A1 by Acquiring. The relevant steps of the Proposed
Transaction, which comprise part of a larger transaction, are set forth below:
(i) Distributing 1 will contribute its c percent interest in FSub 1 directly to DE 1
pursuant to a cause-to-be-directed agreement whereby (a) Distributing 2 will
issue shares of Distributing 2 stock to Sub 1 that are equal in value to the c
PLR-142820-14 6
percent interest in FSub 1, and (b) Sub 1 will issue shares of Sub 1 stock to
Distributing 1 that are equal in value to the c percent interest in FSub 1 (the
“Cause-to-be-Directed Transactions”).
(ii) DE 1 will contribute its j percent interest in FSub 1 to Distributing 3 in exchange
for additional Distributing 3 stock. FSub 1 then will elect to be disregarded as
an entity separate from Distributing 3 effective at least two days after the
contribution. DE 1’s contribution of the FSub 1 stock to Distributing 3, followed
by FSub 1’s election to be disregarded as an entity separate from Distributing
3, are intended to qualify as an acquisitive reorganization under section
368(a)(1)(D) (the “FSub 1 Acquisition”). As a result of the FSub 1 Acquisition,
Distributing 3 will be treated as the sole owner of PRS for U.S. federal income
tax purposes, and PRS will be treated as terminating.
(iii) Sub 3, through one or more disregarded entities, will contribute the stock of
FSub 2 to a newly formed entity that will be treated as a corporation for U.S.
federal income tax purposes (“Newco 1”), and FSub 2 will elect to be treated as
an entity disregarded as separate from Newco 1 for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. Newco 1 then will contribute FSub 2 to a newly formed entity (“DE
7”) that will elect to be disregarded as separate from Newco 1 for U.S. federal
income tax purposes.
(iv) DE 3 will form a new entity that will be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal
income tax purposes (“Newco 2”), which will acquire FSub 2 from DE 7 (the
“Business B1 Purchase”). After the Business B1 Purchase, Business B1
(excluding any Business B1 assets held by DE 5) will represent approximately k
percent of the total assets of Distributing 3.
(v) Controlled 1, through members of its separate affiliated group (within the
meaning of section 355(b)(3)(B)) (“SAG”) and through entities disregarded as
separate from members of its SAG, will purchase from one or more members of
the Distributing Parent Worldwide Group, directly or indirectly, all of the assets,
employees, operations, and goodwill and other intangibles comprising Business
A1a conducted by DE 6 (the “Business A1a Purchase”). After the Business
A1a Purchase, Business A1a will represent approximately l percent of the total
assets of Controlled 1.
(vi) PRS will distribute Controlled 1 to Distributing 3 in a transaction that will be
disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
(vii) In a transaction intended to qualify as a distribution under section 355,
Distributing 3 will distribute Controlled 1 to DE 1, which will distribute Controlled
1 to Distributing 2 (the “First Distribution”).
PLR-142820-14 7
(viii) In a transaction intended to qualify as a distribution under section 355,
Distributing 2 will distribute Controlled 1 to Distributing 1 in redemption of a
portion of the Distributing 2 shares directly held by Distributing 1 (the “Second
Distribution”).
(ix) In a transaction intended to qualify as a distribution under section 355,
Distributing 1 will distribute Controlled 1 to Distributing Parent (the “Third
Distribution”).
(x) Controlled 1, through members of its SAG and through entities disregarded as
separate from members of its SAG, will purchase additional Business A1
assets from members of the Distributing Parent Worldwide Group.
(xi) After a series of internal distributions intended to qualify as distributions under
section 355, Distributing Parent will wholly and directly own Controlled 2 (a
State C corporation).
(xii) Distributing Parent will contribute the stock of Controlled 1 and Controlled 2 to a
newly formed entity that will be treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income
tax purposes (“Controlled 3”), and Distributing Parent will either (i) distribute, on
a pro rata basis, all the stock of Controlled 3 to Distributing Parent’s public
shareholders, or (ii) offer to Distributing Parent’s public shareholders the right to
exchange currently outstanding shares of Distributing Parent stock for
Controlled 3 stock in a transaction intended to qualify as a reorganization under
sections 355 and 368(a)(1)(D).
RULINGS
(1) For purposes of applying section 351, the Cause-to-be-Directed Transactions
will be treated as if (a) Distributing 1 transfers its c percent interest in FSub 1 to
Sub 1 in exchange for Sub 1 stock, and (b) Sub 1 transfers the c percent
interest in FSub 1 to Distributing 2 in exchange for Distributing 2 stock, in
transactions separate from the FSub 1 Acquisition. See Rev. Rul. 2003-51,
2003-1 C.B. 938; Rev. Rul. 77-449, 1977-2 C.B. 110.
(2) With respect to the First Distribution, the Second Distribution, and the Third
Distribution, as applicable, the relative fair market value of the gross assets of
Business A1a (as compared to the fair market value of all gross assets of
Controlled 1), and the relative fair market value of the gross assets of Business
B1 formerly held directly by FSub 2 (as compared to the fair market value of all
gross assets of Distributing 3 or Distributing 2, as applicable), will not prevent
Business A1a or Business B1 from qualifying as an active trade or business for
purposes of section 355(b).
PLR-142820-14 8
CAVEATS
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax treatment of the Proposed Transaction under any provision of the Code or the
regulations promulgated thereunder or the tax treatment of any condition existing at the
time of, or effects resulting from, the Proposed Transaction that is not specifically
covered by the above rulings.
PROCEDURAL STATEMENTS
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Russell G. Jones
Senior Counsel, Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.