Private Letter Ruling 201529018 Released July 17, 2015 Approved Transcribed from scan

Unauthorized SEP distributions receive 60-day rollover waiver

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A bank resigned as custodian of two simplified employee pension accounts and issued distribution checks without the taxpayer's knowledge. Because the taxpayer was newly married, preparing to move, and expecting a child, the unopened checks were packed with financial papers and not discovered until tax-return preparation. The amounts were not used for another purpose, and the taxpayer later arranged a trustee-to-trustee transfer into a new SEP account. The IRS found that the missed 60-day deadline resulted from the financial institution's unauthorized distributions and circumstances beyond the taxpayer's reasonable control. It waived the deadline, so the transfers would qualify as valid rollovers if all other section 408(d)(3) requirements were met.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the 60-day rollover deadline be waived for two unexpected SEP distributions issued when the bank resigned as custodian?
  • Outcome: Approved, the 60-day deadline is waived for both distributions
  • Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3)(I); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 2 0 1 5 2 9 0 1 8

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

DIVISION 0 4 2 1 1 5

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

T:EP:RA:T2

Legend:

Taxpayer A

SEP B

SEP C =

Bank D =

SEP E

Custodian F

Amount 1

Amount 2

Dear

This is in response to your request dated October 15, 2014, as supplemented by
correspondence dated March 16, 2015, from your authorized representative, in which
you requested a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section
408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code’).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested:

Taxpayer A represents that he received a distribution of Amount 1 from SEP B and
Amount 2 from SEP C. Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover
within the 60-day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) was due to the unauthorized

201529018

distributions of Amount 1 and Amount 2 by Bank D. Taxpayer A further represents that
Amounts 1 and 2 have not been used for any other purpose.

Taxpayer maintained SEP B and SEP C with Bank D. In August, 20 , Bank B, without
the knowledge of Taxpayer A, closed SEP B and SEP C and issued distribution checks
in Amount 1 and Amount 2, respectively. Bank B indicated the SEPs were closed
because they were resigning as custodian. During this time Taxpayer A had just
married, was preparing to move, and was awaiting the birth of his daughter. Since
Taxpayer A was not expecting a distribution from Bank D, the distribution checks were
set aside unopened and were packed for his move with Taxpayer A's other financial
documents. The distribution checks were not discovered until Taxpayer A was gathering
information for his accountant to prepare his federal income tax return in 20

Taxpayer A contacted Bank D and requested that the checks and Form 1009-R, issued
in20 ,be voided. On April 18,20 , Taxpayer A opened SEP E with Custodian F and
completed forms to effectuate a trustee-to-trustee transfer of Amount 1 from SEP B and
Amount 2 from SEP C to SEP E. Bank B reissued checks in Amounts 1 and 2 payable
to Custodian F FBO Taxpayer A and the trustee-to-trustee transfer took place on April

17, 20

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Service waive the
60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to
the distribution of Amount 1 and Amount 2.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income
by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section
72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit

the IRA is maintained if --

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the
day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into

201529018

such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible
in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3) of the Code).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any
amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at
any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual
received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was
not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d)
do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I).

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining
whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section
408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances,
including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a
rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a
foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the
case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed
since the distribution occurred.

The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent
with his assertion that his failure to accomplish a timely rollover was due to Bank D’s
unauthorized distribution of Amount 1 from SEP B and Amount 2 from SEP C.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the
60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from SEP B and
Amount 2 from SEP C. Provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3) of the
Code, except the 60-day requirement, were met with respect the transfer of Amount 1
and Amount 2 to SEP E on April 17, 20 , such transfers will be considered a valid
rollover contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3).

201529018

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be distributed
by section 408(a)(6) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be
applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter has been sent to your authorized representative in accordance with
a power of attorney on file in this office.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact
Please address all correspondence to

SE:T:EP:RA:T1.
Sincerely,
Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
Enclosures:

Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose

CC:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.