Couple receives more time to opt out of automatic GST exemption allocation
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A married couple elected to split gifts made to an irrevocable trust for their children. Their accountant prepared the gift tax returns but omitted the statements needed to elect out of the automatic allocation of generation-skipping transfer tax exemption. The error was discovered before any taxable distribution, taxable termination, or other event created a GST tax liability. The IRS found that the regulatory-relief requirements were satisfied, including reasonable action, good faith, and no prejudice to the government. It granted the couple 120 days to file supplemental Forms 709 electing out for the transfers made in the two affected years.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the couple receive an extension to elect out of automatic GST exemption allocation for prior transfers to the trust?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 2513, 2601, 2602, 2611, 2631, 2632(c)(5), 2641, 2642(g); Treas. Reg. §§ 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201529003 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/17/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number 2632.00-00, 2642.00-00,
9100.00-00 Person To Contact:
------------------------, ID No. --------------
------------------------ Telephone Number:
-------------- ----------------------
---------------------- Refer Reply To:
------------------------ CC:PSI:B04
PLR-136111-14
Date: MARCH 26, 2015
In re: --------------------------------------------
--------------------------------
LEGEND:
Taxpayer = ----------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spouse = ---------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust = ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date 1 = ---------------------------
Date 2 = --------------------
Date 3 = --------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
x = ----------
y = -------------------------------------------------
Accountant = --------------------------------------
Dear ----------------:
This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter of February 13, 2015,
PLR-136111-14 2
and other correspondence, requesting an extension of time under § 2642 of the Internal
Revenue Code and §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations to elect out of the generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption
automatic allocation rules.
The facts, as represented, are as follows. On Date 1, Taxpayer’s spouse (Spouse)
created an irrevocable trust (Trust). Under Paragraph 3 of Trust, y% of the Trust
property is to be held for the benefit of her children during her life. Trust provides that, if
Taxpayer survives Spouse, Taxpayer may exercise a limited testamentary power of
appointment over a portion of the Trust property (which may include property initially
held in the trusts established for the benefit of their children) in favor of any one or more
of Spouse’s descendants.
Spouse transferred $x to Trust on Date 2 and another $x to Trust on Date 3.
Accountant prepared the Forms 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping
Transfer) Tax Returns for Year 1 and Year 2 in which Taxpayer and Spouse elected to
split the gifts for the trusts established for the benefit of their children under § 2513. The
returns did not include an election out statement described in § 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii) and
§ 26.2632-1(b)(b)(iv) Example 7 to avoid the allocation of GST exemption. The failure
to include the election out statement was later discovered.
Taxpayer now seeks a ruling granting an extension of time to elect out of the automatic
allocation rules with respect to the transfers. To date, no taxable distributions, taxable
terminations, or any other events have occurred with respect to the trusts that would
give rise to a GST tax liability.
Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A generation-
skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable
termination, and (3) a direct skip.
Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax imposed by § 2601 is the taxable
amount multiplied by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) defines the applicable rate as
the product of the maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect
to the transfer. Under § 2642(a), the inclusion ratio with respect to any property
transferred in a generation-skipping transfer is the excess (if any) of 1 over the
applicable fraction. The applicable fraction, as defined in § 2642(a)(2), is a fraction, the
numerator of which is the amount of the GST exemption under § 2631 allocated to the
trust (or to property transferred in a direct skip), and the denominator of which is the
value of the property transferred to the trust or involved in the direct skip.
Section 2631(a) provides that for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every
individual shall be allowed a GST exemption amount which may be allocated by such
individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the
PLR-136111-14 3
transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made,
shall be irrevocable.
Section 2631(c)(1) provides that, for purposes of subsection (a), the GST exemption
amount for any calendar year shall be equal to the basic exclusion amount under
§ 2010(c) for such calendar year.
Section 2632(c)(3)(A) provides that for purposes of § 2632(c), the term “indirect skip”
means any transfer of property (other than a direct skip) subject to the tax imposed by
chapter 12 made to a GST trust, as defined in § 2632(c)(3)(B). Under § 2632(c)(5)(A)(i)(I)
and (II), an individual may elect to have the automatic allocation rule in § 2632(c)(1) not
apply to an indirect skip, or to any or all transfers made by such individual to a particular
trust.
Section 2632(c)(5)(B)(ii) provides that an election under § 2632(c)(5)(A)(i)(II) may be
made on a timely filed gift tax return for the calendar year for which the election is to
become effective.
Section 26.2632-1 (b)(2)(iii) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations
provides, in part, that to elect out, the transferor must attach a statement (election out
statement) to a Form 709 filed within the time period provided in § 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(C)
(whether or not any transfer was made in the calendar year for which the Form 709 was
filed, and whether or not a Form 709 otherwise would be required to be filed for that
year). The election out statement must identify the trust (except for an election out under
§ 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(A)(4)) and specifically must provide that the transferor is electing
out of the automatic allocation of GST exemption with respect to the described transfer
or transfers. Further, unless the election out is made for all transfers made to the trust in
the current year, the current-year transfers to which the election out is to apply must be
specifically described or otherwise identified in the election out statement.
Section 26.2632-1(b)(2)(iii)(C) provides, in part, that to elect out, the Form 709 with the
attached election out statement must be filed on or before the due date for timely filing
(within the meaning of § 26.2632-1(b)(1)(ii)) of the Form 709 for the calendar year in
which the first transfer to be covered by the election out was made.
Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such
circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make
an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election under
§ 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting
comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of
this paragraph.
PLR-136111-14 4
Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under
§ 2642(g)(1), the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including
evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such
other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to
grant relief, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be treated as if not
expressly prescribed by statute.
Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for
allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for
electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust
as a GST trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice
further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation
described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5)
under the provisions of § 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3.
Sections 301.9100 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
301.9100-1(a).
Section 9100-2 provides an automatic extension of time for making certain elections.
Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an
extension of time to make an election whose date is prescribed by a regulation (and not
expressly provided by statute). In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50,
Taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1)
or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of
§ 301.9100-3.
Section 301.9100-3(a) provides, in part, that requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3
will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction
of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant
of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
Section 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides, in part, except as provided in § 301.9100-3(b)(3)(i)
through (iii), that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the
taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional
employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the
taxpayer to make, the election.
Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the
requirements of § 301.9100-3 are satisfied. Therefore, Taxpayer and Spouse are
granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to elect out of the
automatic allocation rules under § 2632(c)(5) for the transfers to Trust during Year 1
PLR-136111-14 5
and Year 2.
The election should be made on Supplemental Forms 709 and filed with the Internal
Revenue Service Center in Cincinnati. A copy of this letter should be forwarded to the
Internal Revenue Service, Cincinnati Service Center - Stop 82, Cincinnati, OH 45999,
for association with the Form 709. You should attach a copy of this letter to the
Supplemental Forms 709. We have enclosed a copy for this purpose.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with the office, we have sent a copy of
this letter to your authorized representative.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Except as specifically ruled herein, we express no opinion on the federal tax
consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions or under any other
provisions of the Code.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Melissa C. Liquerman
Branch Chief, Branch 4
Enclosure
Copy for § 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.