Shareholder may make a retroactive QEF election for a PFIC
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A U.S. shareholder acquired stock in a foreign holding company that had been a passive foreign investment company from the year it was organized. The shareholder gave a competent accounting firm all relevant information for preparing his federal returns but was not advised that the company might be a PFIC or that a qualified electing fund election was available. After the operating company's finance department raised the PFIC issue, the shareholder obtained specialist advice and sought permission for a retroactive QEF election. The PFIC issue had not been raised on audit, and the shareholder submitted the required affidavits explaining the missed election and professional reliance. The IRS found that the regulatory requirements were satisfied and consented to a retroactive QEF election for the acquisition year, subject to the prescribed filing rules.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the shareholder make a retroactive QEF election after reasonably relying on a tax professional who did not identify the company as a PFIC?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1295, 1297; Treas. Reg. § 1.1295-3(f), (g)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201528036 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/10/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1295.02-02
Person To Contact:
-------- -------------------, ID No. ----------------
---------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------- --------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:B02
PLR-145060-14
Date:
March 25, 2015
TY:------
Legend
Shareholder = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
FC1 = ------------------------------------------------------
FC2 = ----------------------------------------
Country A = ---------------------
Country B = -------
Year 1 = ------
Year 2 = ------
Year 3 = ------
Accounting Firm = ---------------------
Advisor = --------------------------------------------------
Month = --------------
Dear -------:
This is in response to a letter dated September 30, 2014, submitted by Shareholder’s
authorized representatives, that requested the consent of the Commissioner of the
Internal Revenue Service (Commissioner) for Shareholder to make a retroactive
qualified electing fund (QEF) election under section 1295(b) of the Internal Revenue
Code and Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f) with respect to Shareholder’s investment in FC1.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted on behalf of Shareholder by its authorized representatives, and accompanied
by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has
not verified any of the material submitted in support of this request for ruling, such
material is subject to verification on examination. The information submitted in the
request is substantially as set forth below.
PLR-145060-14 2
FACTS
Shareholder is a U.S. citizen and an executive of FC2, a company organized under the
laws of Country A that operates principally in Country B. FC1 is a holding company for
shares of FC2 that was organized under the laws of Country A in Year 1 and has been
a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) as defined in section 1297 since Year 1.
Shareholder acquired shares of FC1 in Year 1.
Shareholder retained Accounting Firm to prepare all of his U.S. federal income tax
returns including his return for Year 1. Accounting Firm is competent to render tax
advice to U.S. shareholders of foreign corporations. Shareholder provided Accounting
Firm all relevant facts and circumstances to prepare his U.S. federal income tax returns.
At no point before Month of Year 3 did Shareholder become aware that FC1 might be a
PFIC, and thus Shareholder was not aware of the possibility of making a QEF election
with respect to FC1. Shareholder became aware that FC1 might be a PFIC in Month of
Year 3, when the finance department of FC2 advised Shareholder that FC1 might be a
PFIC.
Once Shareholder became aware of the possibility that FC1 was a PFIC, Shareholder
sought advice from Advisor about the implications of ownership of shares in a PFIC.
Advisor provided Shareholder with advice about the implications of owning shares in a
PFIC, the availability of a retroactive QEF election, and the mechanics and benefits of
making such an election.
Shareholder has submitted an affidavit, signed under penalties of perjury, which
describes the events that led to the failure to make the QEF election with respect to FC1
by the election due date, including the role of Accounting Firm. Shareholder also
submitted an affidavit from Advisor, signed under penalties of perjury, corroborating the
statements made by Shareholder.
Shareholder represents that, as of the date of this request for ruling, the PFIC status of
FC1 has not been raised by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on audit for any of the
taxable years at issue.
RULING REQUESTED
Shareholder requests the consent of the Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF
election with respect to FC1 for Year 1 under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f).
LAW
Section 1295(a) provides that a PFIC will be treated as a QEF with respect to a
shareholder if (1) an election by the shareholder under section 1295(b) applies to the
PLR-145060-14 3
PFIC for the taxable year; and (2) the PFIC complies with the requirements prescribed
by the Secretary for purposes of determining the ordinary earnings and net capital gains
of the company.
Under section 1295(b)(2), a QEF election may be made for a taxable year at any time
on or before the due date (determined with regard to extensions) for filing the return for
the taxable year. To the extent provided in regulations, the election may be made after
the due date if the shareholder failed to make an election by the due date because the
shareholder reasonably believed the company was not a PFIC.
Under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f), a shareholder may request the consent of the
Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF election for a taxable year if:
1. the shareholder reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, within the
meaning of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(2);
2. granting consent will not prejudice the interests of the United States
government, as provided in Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(3);
3. the request is made before a representative of the IRS raises upon audit the
PFIC status of the company for any taxable year of the shareholder; and
4. the shareholder satisfies the procedural requirements of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-
3(f)(4).
The procedural requirements include filing a request for consent to make a retroactive
election with, and submitting a user fee to, the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(International). Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(4)(i). Additionally, affidavits signed under
penalties of perjury must be submitted that describe:
1. the events that led to the failure to make a QEF election by the election due
date;
2. the discovery of the failure;
3. the engagement and responsibilities of the qualified tax professional; and
4. the extent to which the shareholder relied on the professional.
Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(4)(ii) and (iii).
CONCLUSION
Based on the information submitted and representations made with Shareholder’s ruling
request, we conclude that Shareholder has satisfied Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f).
Accordingly, consent is granted to Shareholder to make a retroactive QEF election with
respect to FC1 for Year 1, provided that Shareholder complies with the rules under
Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(g) regarding the time and manner for making the retroactive
QEF election.
PLR-145060-14 4
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.
This private letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter
ruling is being sent to your authorized representatives.
A copy of this letter ruling must be attached to any federal income tax return to which it
is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control
number of the letter ruling.
Sincerely,
Kristine Crabtree
Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 2
(International)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.