Private Letter Ruling 201527001 Released July 3, 2015 Approved

Family receives relief for missed GST exemption allocations

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A married couple made transfers to several irrevocable trusts for their children and descendants, but their tax advisers failed to allocate generation-skipping transfer tax exemptions to many of the transfers. Some gift-tax returns were filed without allocations, while others were not filed at all. The IRS granted the surviving spouse and the deceased spouse's executor 120 days to make the requested late allocations, effective as of the original transfer dates and based on finally determined gift-tax values. It also confirmed that the deceased spouse's unused exemption was automatically allocated to a testamentary trust and that the surviving spouse's exemption was automatically allocated to two later transfers under the post-2000 rules.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the spouses make late GST exemption allocations, and did the automatic-allocation rules cover specified later transfers?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 120 days for the late allocations and confirmation of the automatic allocations.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2631, 2632, and 2642(g); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201527001 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/2/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2642.00-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------- ----------------------, ID No. ------------------
------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
-------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:04
PLR-101784-15
Date:
March 23, 2015

Legend

Husband = ------------------------------------------------
Wife = --------------------------------------------
Child 1 = ---------------------
Child 2 = ----------------------
Child 3 = ------------------
Accountant 1 = --------------------------
Accountant 2 = ----------------------------
Financial Advisor = ---------------------
Attorney = -----------------------
Trust 1 = ---------------------------------------------
Trust 2 = ---------------------------------------------
Trust 3 = ------------------------------------------
Trust 4 = -----------------------------------------------
Trust 5 = ------------------------------------------------------
Partnership 1 = ----------------------------------------------
Partnership 2 = -----------------------------------------
Partnership 3 = --------------------------------------------
Date 1 = ----------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Year 4 = -------
Year 5 = -------
Year 6 = -------
Year 7 = -------
Year 8 = -------
Year 9 = -------
Year 10 = -------
State = -----------------

PLR-101784-15 2

Dear ---------------:

   This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated

December 23, 2014, and subsequent correspondence, requesting an extension of time
under § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to allocate Husband and Wife’s generation-skipping transfer
(GST) tax exemptions to certain transfers to trusts and rulings that the automatic
allocation rules of § 2632(c) and (e) apply to certain transfers to trusts.

FACTS

    The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:

    Husband and Wife live in a community property state, State. On Date 1, in

Year 1, a date prior to December 31, 2000, Husband and Wife executed three
irrevocable trusts, Trust 1, Trust 2, and Trust 3 (Children’s Trusts) for the lifetime benefit
of Child 1, Child 2, and Child 3, respectively. Each trust provides that during the
grantor’s life, the trustee shall distribute to the child so much of the income or principal
of the trust as the trustee deems reasonably required for his or her maintenance and
support in health and reasonable comfort. If a child predeceases one of the grantors,
the remaining assets in his or her trust are held for the benefit of that child’s
descendants. If the child beneficiary survives the last to die of Husband and Wife, then
in addition to a continued right to receive the discretionary distributions of income and
principal during his lifetime, the child shall have a testamentary limited power of
appointment over the trust assets. If the child fails to exercise his power of
appointment, the trust assets shall pass to the child’s then living issue and, if none, to
grantor’s then living issue. On Date 1, Husband and Wife also formed three
partnerships, Partnership 1, Partnership 2, and Partnership 3.

   In Year 1, Husband and Wife transferred units in Partnership 1 and Partnership 2

to Trust 1 and Trust 2 and units in Partnership 2 and Partnership 3 to Trust 3. Husband
and Wife each reported his or her respective portion of the Year 1 transfers on timely
filed Forms 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return.
Husband and Wife retained Accountant 1 to prepare their Year 1 Forms 709. Husband
and Wife intended to allocate their GST exemption to the Year 1 transfers. However,
Accountant 1 failed to allocate Husband’s and Wife’s GST exemption to the Year 1
transfers.

   In Year 2, Husband died. Husband’s Will created and funded Trust 4. Trust 4

provides that if Wife survives Husband, the trustee shall distribute to Wife for her life so
much of the income and principal of the trust as the trustee deems reasonably required
for her maintenance and support, in health and reasonable comfort. Upon Wife’s death,
the trustee is to distribute the remaining principal and accumulated income to the

PLR-101784-15 3

Children’s Trusts as specified in Trust 4. Wife, as the executor of Husband’s estate,
timely filed a Form 706, United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax
Return. Wife retained Accountant 2 to prepare Husband’s Form 706. Husband
intended to allocate his GST exemption to the transfer to Trust 4. However,
Accountant 2 failed to allocate Husband’s GST exemption to the transfer to Trust 4.

   In Year 2, a year prior to December 31, 2000, Wife created and funded Trust 5,

an irrevocable trust. Trust 5 provides that the trustee shall divide the principal of Trust 5
and any accumulated income or additions to Trust 5 into three (3) equal funds -- one
fund to benefit each of Child 1, Child 2 and Child 3. During Wife's lifetime, the fund
established for a child is to be held for the benefit of that child and his or her children.
Upon Wife’s death each fund in Trust 5 is to be distributed to the appropriate Children’s
Trust. Wife did not file a Form 709 to report the Year 2 transfer to Trust 5 and,
accordingly, she did not allocate her GST exemption to this transfer.

   In Year 3, a year prior to December 31, 2000, Wife transferred units in

Partnership 1 to Trust 1. Wife did not file a timely Form 709 to report the Year 3 transfer
to Trust and, accordingly, she did not allocate her GST exemption to this transfer. In
Year 10, Wife filed a Form 709 to report the Year 3 transfer to Trust 1. However, she
did not make a late allocation of her GST exemption to this transfer.

   In Years 4 through 7, years prior to December 31, 2000, Wife made cash gifts to

Trust 5. Wife did not file a Form 709 to report the Years 4, 5, 6, or 7 transfers to Trust 5
and, accordingly, she did not allocate her GST exemption to these transfers.

   In Year 8, a year after December 31, 2000, Wife made an additional cash gift to

Trust 5. Wife did not file a Form 709 to report this transfer to Trust 5 and, accordingly,
she did not allocate her GST exemption to this transfer.

  In Year 9, a year after December 31, 2000, Wife transferred units in

Partnership 3 to Trust 3. Wife timely filed a Form 709 to report this transfer to Trust 3.
However, she did not allocate her GST exemption to this transfer.

   Wife relied upon Financial Advisor, Attorney, and Accountant 2 to advise her

regarding the filing of Forms 709 for Years 2 through 8 for the transfers to Trust 1 and
Trust 5. Financial Advisor and Attorney relied upon Accountant 2 to prepare Wife’s
Forms 709 for Years 2 through 8 and to properly allocate Wife’s GST exemption to
these transfers. Wife intended to allocate her GST exemption to these transfers.
However, Accountant 2 failed to prepare the Forms 709 for Wife for these years.

   It is represented that Husband and Wife have sufficient GST exemption to

allocate to the Year 1 through Year 9 transfers.

RULINGS REQUESTED

PLR-101784-15 4

  1. Wife requests an extension of time to allocate her GST exemption to the Year 1
    transfers to the Children’s Trusts, to the Year 3 transfer to Trust 1, and to the
    Year 2 and Years 4 through 7 transfers to Trust 5. These allocations are
    effective on the date of the transfers and are based on the value of the
    transferred property as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12.

  2. Wife, as executor of Husband’s estate, requests an extension of time to
    allocate Husband’s GST exemption to the Year 1 transfers to the Children’s
    Trusts. These allocations are effective on the date of the transfers and are
    based on the value of the transferred property as finally determined for purposes
    of chapter 12.

  3. Husband’s GST exemption was automatically allocated under § 2632(e) to the
    Year 2 transfer to Trust 4.

  4. Wife’s GST exemption was automatically allocated under § 2632(c) to the Year 8
    transfer to Trust 5 and the Year 9 transfer to Trust 3.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer (GST). A GST

is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and
(3) a direct skip.

   Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax is the taxable amount multiplied

by the “applicable rate.” Section 2641(a) defines applicable rate as the product of the
maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.

   Under § 2642(a)(1), the inclusion ratio with respect to any property transferred in

a generation-skipping transfer is generally defined as the excess (if any) of 1 over the
“applicable fraction.” The applicable fraction, as defined in § 2642(a)(2), is a fraction,
the numerator of which is the amount of the GST exemption allocated to the trust (or to
property transferred in a direct skip), and the denominator of which is the value of the
property transferred to the trust or involved in the direct skip, reduced by the sum of any
federal estate tax or state death tax actually recovered from the trust attributable to such
property and any charitable deduction allowed under § 2055 or 2522 with respect to
such property.

   Section 2631(a), as in effect for the tax years at issue, provided that, for

purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a
GST exemption of $1,000,000 (adjusted for inflation under § 2631(c)) which may be
allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such
individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under

PLR-101784-15 5

§ 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.

   Section 2632(a) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her

GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date
prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual's estate (determined with
regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

   Section 26.2632-1(b)(4)(i) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations

provides, in part, that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the
transferor's lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709.

    Section 2632(c) is effective for transfers subject to chapter 11 or 12 made after

December 31, 2000, and in this case, Years 8 and 9. Section 2632(c)(1) provides that if
any individual makes an indirect skip during such individual’s lifetime, any unused
portion of such individual’s GST exemption shall be allocated to the property transferred
to the extent necessary to make the inclusion ratio for such property zero. If the amount
of the indirect skip exceeds such unused portion, the entire unused portion shall be
allocated to the property transferred.

   Section 2632(c)(3)(A) provides that for purposes of § 2632(c), the term “indirect

skip” means any transfer of property (other than a direct skip) subject to the tax imposed
by chapter 12 made to a GST Trust. Section 2632(c)(3)(B) provides that the term
“GST trust” means a trust that could have a generation-skipping transfer with respect to
the transferor unless the trust is described in § 2632(c)(3)(B)(i) through (vi).

   Section 2632(e) provides that any portion of an individual’s GST exemption

which has not been allocated within the time prescribed by § 2632(a) shall be deemed
to be allocated first, to property which is the subject of a direct skip occurring at such
individual’s death, and second, to trusts with respect to which such individual is the
transferor and from which a taxable distribution or a taxable termination might occur at
or after such individual’s death.

    Section 26.2632-1(e)(2) provides, in relevant part, that a decedent’s unused

GST exemption is automatically allocated on the due date for filing Form 706 or Form
706 NA to the extent not otherwise allocated by the decedent’s executor on or before
that date. The automatic allocation occurs whether or not a return is actually required to
be filed. Unused GST exemption is allocated pro rata (subject to the rules of § 26.2642-
2(b)), on the basis of the value of the property as finally determined for purposes of
chapter 11 (chapter 11 value), first to direct skips treated as occurring at the transferor’s
death. The balance, if any, of unused GST exemption is allocated pro rata (subject to
the rules of § 26.2642-2(b)) on the basis of the chapter 11 value of the nonexempt
portion of the trust property (or in the case of trusts that are not included in the gross
estate, on the basis of the date of death value of the trust) to trusts with respect to which
a taxable termination may occur or from which a taxable distribution may be made.

PLR-101784-15 6

   Section 2642(b) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation of

the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a timely filed gift tax return
or is deemed to be made under § 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1), the value of such property for
purposes of § 2632(a) shall be its value as finally determined for purposes of
chapter 12, and such allocation shall be effective on and after the date of such transfer
and if property is transferred as a result of the death of the transferor, the value of such
property for purposes of § 2632(a) shall be its value as finally determined for purposes
of chapter 11 and such allocation shall be effective on and after the due date of the
death of the transferor.

   Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, generally, that the Secretary shall, by regulation,

prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be
granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1). Such
regulations shall include procedures for requesting comparable relief with respect to
transfers made before the date of the enactment of § 2642(g)(1)(A).

   Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief, the

Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent
contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the
Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief, the time
for making the allocation shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

    Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time

for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers is to be treated as if not expressly
prescribed by statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an
extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) under the provisions
of § 301.9100-3.

    Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a

reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3
to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except
in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

   Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant

an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation
(and not expressly provided by statute). Under § 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election
includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin. In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(b) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers
may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) under
the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

PLR-101784-15 7

   Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer

provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice
the interests of the government.

   Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted

reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

    Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that

the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly, Wife is granted an
extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to allocate Wife’s
GST exemption to the Year 1 transfers to Children’s Trusts, to the Year 3 transfer to
Trust 1, and to the Year 2 and Years 4 through 7 transfers to Trust 5. Wife, as executor
of Husband’s estate, is granted an extension of time to allocate Husband’s GST
exemption to the Year 1 transfers to Children’s Trusts. These allocations are effective
on the date of the transfer and are based on the value of the transferred property as
finally determined for purposes of chapter 12.

  Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we rule that

Husband’s GST exemption was automatically allocated to the transfer to Trust 4 on the
due date for filing Form 706 for Husband’s estate. Further, we rule that Wife’s
GST exemption was automatically allocated to the Year 8 transfer to Trust 5 and the
Year 9 transfer to Trust 3 on the date of the transfers.

   Wife allocations of GST exemption should be made on supplemental Forms 709

for Year 1 and Year 3, and on original Forms 709 filed for Year 2 and Years 4 through 7.
Husband’s allocations of GST exemption should be made on a supplemental Form 709
for Year 1. The supplemental and original returns should be filed with the Internal
Revenue Service Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45999. A copy of this letter should be
attached to each supplemental and original return. A copy of this letter is enclosed for
this purpose.

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

PLR-101784-15 8

  The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations

submitted by the Taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material
submitted in support of the request for ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Passthroughs & Special Industries)


                                   _______________________________
                                   Lorraine E. Gardner,
                                   Senior Counsel, Branch 4
                                   Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy for section 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.