Late return preserved three-year refund lookback
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel concluded that a refund claim filed as part of the taxpayer's return was timely because the claim and return were the same filing. Under section 6511(a), the claim was therefore filed within three years of the return. Section 6511(b)(2)(A) provided a lookback period of three years plus the four-month filing extension, even if the taxpayer did not actually file during the extension period. Levy payments collected within that lookback could be recovered. A substitute for return under section 6020(b) did not change the section 6511 analysis.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Was the refund claim timely, and how far back could the taxpayer recover levy payments?
- Outcome: Advice given that the claim was timely and the lookback included the four-month filing extension.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 6020(b), 6511(a), and 6511(b)(2)(A).
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2015060211232954 [Third Party Communication:
UILC: 6511.00-00
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Number: 201526013
Release Date: 6/26/2015
From:
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 11:23:29 AM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: FW: CF5710718 - RSED issue
After much additional research and discussion with one of the section 6511 experts in Counsel, it turns out that the TAS point of view is correct – because the refund claim and the return were one and the same, the refund claim was filed within 3 years from the return and therefore timely under section 6511(a). Then under section 6511(b)(2)(A), the look-back period is the 3 years and 4 months. Consequently, payments collected via levy between ------------------------- (3 years and 4 months) can be recovered. It doesn’t matter if the taxpayer actually filed within the 4-month extension period – the taxpayer still gets the benefit of the extension period for purposes of the look-back.
The SFR was a red herring – notwithstanding that section 6020(b) says the SFR is good and sufficient for legal purposes, there is caselaw that says you ignore the SFR for section 6511 purposes.
The relevant entry in IRM 25.6.1.10.2.7 says:
Return filed after the due date and claim filed within 3 years from filing of return – refund is limited to “[t]ax paid during the period immediately preceding filing of claim equal 3 years plus any extensions of time for filing can be refunded.
Section 6511(b)(2)(A).”
Sorry for any confusion I may have caused. I have let ------- Counsel know that their original advice was incorrect.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace