Private Letter Ruling 201526004 Released June 26, 2015 Approved

Late GST exemption allocations allowed for two trusts

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A decedent and spouse made gifts over sixteen years to two materially identical trusts for their daughters. The trusts were not treated as GST trusts under the automatic-allocation rules, and several tax professionals failed to allocate or recommend allocating generation-skipping transfer tax exemption on the gift-tax returns. Because the remaining exemption was insufficient to cover all transfers, the trusts otherwise would have inclusion ratios between zero and one. The IRS found that the estate and spouse had reasonably relied on qualified tax professionals and satisfied the good-faith requirements for regulatory relief. It granted 120 days to file supplemental and original Forms 709 allocating available GST exemption, effective as of each transfer date and based on the full value transferred.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the estate and surviving spouse make late GST exemption allocations to sixteen years of transfers to two trusts?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 120 days to file Forms 709
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2631, 2632, and 2642(g); Treas. Reg. §§ 26.2632-1 and 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201526004 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/26/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 2642.00-00,
2652.00-00 Person To Contact:
---------------, ID No. ----------------
------------------------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------------------------- --------------------
-------------------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------------- CC:PSI:04
------------------------- PLR-135535-14

                                                           Date:
     Re: -------------------------------------------- March 18, 2015

     -------------------------------

Legend

Decedent = -------------------------------------------------------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Trust 1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust 2 = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daughter 1 = -----------------------
Daughter 2 = ------------------------
Wife = ----------------------------------------------------
Year 1 = ------
Year 2 = ------
Year 3 = ------
Year 4 = ------
Year 5 = ------
Year 6 = ------
Year 7 = ------
Year 8 = ------
Year 9 = ------
Year 10 = ------
CPA 1 = -------------------------
CPA 2 = ----------------------
Tax Professional = --------------------------------------
Year 11 = ------
Year 12 = ------
Year 13 = ------
Year 14 = ------
Year 15 = ------
PLR-135535-14 2

Year 16 = ------
Date 2 = ------------------

Dear --------------------------------------------------:

  This responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated

September 19, 2014, and subsequent correspondence, requesting an extension of time
under § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to allocate generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax
exemptions to transfers to trusts.

FACTS

    The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:

   On Date 1, Decedent created Trust 1 and Trust 2 for the benefit of Daughter 1

and Daughter 2, respectively. The terms of Trust 1 and Trust 2 (collectively, Trusts) are
identical in all material respects, but for the identity of the beneficiary. Under the
provisions of the Trusts, a GST will likely occur. However, Trust 1 and Trust 2 are not
considered “GST trusts” within the meaning of § 2632(c)(3)(B). Accordingly, the
automatic allocation rules contained in § 2632(c) will not apply to either Trust 1 or
Trust 2.

     In Year 1 through Year 10, Decedent made transfers to each of Trust 1 and

Trust 2. CPA 1 prepared Decedent’s and Wife’s Year 1 United States Gift (and
Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return (Form 709). CPA 2 prepared Decedent’s
and Wife’s Year 8 Form 709. Tax Professional prepared Decedent’s and Wife’s Year 2
through Year 7, Year 9, and Year 10 Forms 709. On each of the Year 1 through Year
10 Forms 709, Decedent and Wife signified their consent to treat the gifts made in each
year as being made one-half by each spouse, pursuant to § 2513. On the Year 1
through Year 10 Forms 709, CPA 1, CPA 2, and Tax Professional reported the transfers
for gift tax purposes, treating each transfer as qualifying for the gift tax annual exclusion
under § 2503(b). However, CPA 1, CPA 2, and Tax Professional each failed to allocate
or advise Decedent and Wife to allocate their GST exemption to the gifts on the returns.

  Decedent and Wife have insufficient remaining GST exemption to exempt all of

the Year 8 transfers. Consequently, Trust 1 and Trust 2 will have an inclusion ratio
between zero and one.

   In Year 11 through Year 16, Decedent and Wife each separately transferred the

annual exclusion amount to each of Trust 1 and Trust 2. However, Decedent and Wife
did not file Forms 709 reporting the transfers and accordingly, no GST exemption was
allocated for any of the transfers made during this period. Similar to the previous years
in which gift tax returns were filed, Decedent’s and Wife’s tax advisors failed to
PLR-135535-14 3

recognize that GST exemption should be allocated to the gifts to the Trusts and failed to
make such recommendation to Decedent and Wife. Decedent died on Date 2.

   Decedent’s estate and Wife request an extension of time pursuant to § 2642(g)

and §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3, to allocate their GST exemption to their respective
transfers to Trust 1 and Trust 2 made in Years 1 through 16, and are requesting that the
GST exemption allocated to the transfers will be effective as of the date of each
transfer.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

   Section 2513(a)(1) provides that a gift made by one spouse to any person other

than his spouse shall be considered as made one-half by him and one-half by his
spouse, but only if at the time of the gift each spouse is a citizen or resident of the
United States. Section 2513(a)(1) only applies if both spouses have signified their
consent to the application of this section in the case of all such gifts made during the
calendar year by either while married to the other.

   Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A generation-

skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable
termination, and (3) a direct skip.

   Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax is the taxable amount multiplied

by the applicable rate.

   Section 2641(a) defines the term “applicable rate” with respect to any GST as the

product of the maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to
the transfer.

   Section 2642(a)(1) provides that, generally, the inclusion ratio with respect to any

property transferred in a GST is the excess of 1 over the “applicable fraction.” With
respect to a GST that is not a direct skip, § 2642(a)(2) provides that, in general, the
applicable fraction is a fraction the numerator of which is the amount of the GST
exemption under § 2631 allocated to the trust and the denominator of which is the value
of the property transferred to the trust.

  Section 2631(a), as in effect for Year 1 through Year 8, provided that, for

purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST
exemption of $1,000,000 which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to
any property with respect to which such individual is the transferor.

  Section 2631(a), as in effect for Year 9 through Year 16, provides that for

purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST
exemption amount which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any
PLR-135535-14 4

property with respect to which such individual is the transferor. Section 2631(c)
provides that for purposes of § 2631(a), the GST exemption amount for any calendar
year is equal to the basic exclusion amount under § 2010(c) for such calendar year.

   Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall

be irrevocable.

     Section 2632(a)(1) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST

exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed
for filing the estate tax return for such individual’s estate (determined with regard to
extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

   Section 2632(c) is effective for transfers subject to chapter 11 or 12 made after

December 31, 2000. See P.L. 107-16, § 561(a). Section 2632(c)(1), as amended,
provides that if any individual makes an indirect skip during such individual’s lifetime,
any unused portion of such individual’s GST exemption shall be allocated to the
property transferred to the extent necessary to make the inclusion ratio for such
property zero. If the amount of the indirect skip exceeds such portion, the entire unused
portion shall be allocated to the property transferred.

  Section 2632(c)(3)(A) provides that for purposes of § 2632(c), the term indirect

skip means any transfer of property (other than a direct skip) subject to the tax imposed
by chapter 12 to a GST trust.

   Section 2632(c)(3)(B) provides, in part, that the term “GST trust” means a trust

that could have a GST with respect to the transferor unless the trust instrument provides
that more than 25 percent of the trust corpus must be distributed to or may be
withdrawn by one or more individuals who are non-skip persons before the date that the
individual attains age 46. For purposes of this subparagraph, the value of transferred
property shall not be considered to be includible in the gross estate of a non-skip person
or subject to a right of withdrawal by reason of such person holding a right to withdraw
so much of such property as does not exceed the amount referred to in §2503(b) with
respect to any transferor, and it shall be assumed that powers of appointment held by
non-skip persons will not be exercised.

   Section 26.2632-1(b)(4)(i) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations

provides that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the
transferor’s lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709.

   Section 2642(b)(1) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation

of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return filed on or
before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for such transfer, the value of such property for
purposes of § 2642(a) shall be its value as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12
PLR-135535-14 5

(within the meaning of § 2001(f)(2)).

   Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe

such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to
make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election
under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting
comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of
this paragraph.

   Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under

this paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances,
including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer
and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining
whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the time for making the allocation (or
election) shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

    Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time

for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for
electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust
as a GST trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice
further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation
described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5)
under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

  Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a

reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3
to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months
except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal
Revenue Code except in subtitles E, G, H, and I.

   Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that, in general, requests for extensions of time

for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 must be
made under the rules of § 301.9100-3.

   Under § 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election includes an election whose due

date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In accordance
with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to
make an election described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in
§ 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

  Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer

provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice
PLR-135535-14 6

the interests of the government.

  Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted

reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or to advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

   Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that

the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, Decedent’s estate
and Wife are granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to
allocate their respective available GST exemption to the transfers made to Trust 1 and
Trust 2 in Years 1 through 16. The allocations will be effective as of the date of each
transfer and will be based on the full value of the assets transferred to Trust 1 and
Trust 2 on the date of each transfer.

   The allocations should be made on supplemental and original Forms 709 for

each year in which a transfer was made, and filed with the Internal Revenue Service
Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to each
supplemental or original Form 709. A copy of this letter is enclosed for this purpose.

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
PLR-135535-14 7

material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.
Sincerely,

                                    Melissa C. Liquerman
                                    Chief, Branch 4
                                    Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                    (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy for section 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.