Private Letter Ruling 201525001 Released June 19, 2015 Approved

Trust division preserved tax treatment and asset basis

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A trust for a daughter and her descendants proposed dividing its assets equally between two successor trusts, one for each family line. The daughter would remain a beneficiary of both trusts, and her distributions would be charged equally to them. The IRS ruled that the division would preserve the trust's zero generation-skipping transfer tax inclusion ratio and would not create a taxable gift or cause estate inclusion for any beneficiary. It also ruled that the successor trusts would be treated as separate trusts if separately managed and administered. The pro rata division would not create a taxable distribution or recognized income, gain, or loss, and each successor trust would retain the original basis in its share of the assets.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would a court-approved pro rata trust division preserve the trust's transfer-tax, income-tax, and basis treatment?
  • Outcome: Approved on all six requested rulings
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 643(f), 1001, 1015, 2501, and 2601; Treas. Reg. § 26.2601-1(b)(4)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201525001 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/19/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1001.00-00, 1015.00-00,
1223.00-00, 2036.00-00, Person To Contact:
2037.00-00, 2038.00-00, ----------------------, ID No. -------------
2501.00-00, 2601.00-00, Telephone Number:
61.00-00, 643.00-00, 661.00- ---------------------
00, 662.00-00 Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
---------------------------------------- PLR-106500-15
------------------------------------------------------------ Date:
------------------- March 12, 2015



Settlor = -------------------------

Trust = -----------------------------------------------
------------------------

Daughter = -----------------------------------------------
-------------------------

Date 1 = ---------------------------

Date 2 = --------------------------

Date 3 = --------------------------

State = ------

a = -----------------------------------------

b = -----------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
Court = -----------------------------------------------
------------------

PLR-106500-15 2

Dear -----------------

This letter responds to a letter dated January 14, 2015, submitted on behalf of Trust,
requesting rulings on the income, estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax
consequences of the division of a trust.

FACTS

Settlor died on Date 2, a resident of State. Section 2.1 of Settlor’s will, dated Date 1,
established a trust (Trust) for the benefit of Daughter and her descendants.

Section 2.1.1 of Settlor’s will provides that the trustee may pay to Daughter all or part of
the net income of Trust as the trustee determines to be necessary to provide for her
support, comfort, maintenance and medical care. Additionally, section 2.1.1 provides
that the trustee in its discretion may distribute any net income not paid to Daughter to
any one or more of Daughter’s issue in such shares as the trustee determines. Net
income not distributed is to be accumulated and added to principal.

Section 2.1.2 of Settlor’s will provides that the trustee in its discretion may make
distributions of principal to Daughter to the extent the net income of Trust is insufficient
to provide for Daughter’s support and maintenance or to meet any emergency which
may confront Daughter.

Section 2.1.3 of Settlor’s will provides that the trustee in its discretion may distribute to
any one or more of Daughter’s children as much of the principal as the trustee
determines is necessary to provide for such child’s support, maintenance, education
and medical care, considering his or her other income and means of support known to
the trustee. Any distribution of principal made to Daughter’s child under this section
shall be treated as an advancement of principal to such child, and shall be charged
without interest, at the value of such advancement when made, against the distributive
share of such child, or of such child’s issue, upon the termination of Trust.

Section 2.1.4 of Settlor’s will provide that Trust terminates upon the death of Daughter.
Upon termination, Trust shall distribute principal and any undistributed income to the
then living issue of Daughter, per stirpes, subject to any adjustments made for
advancements as provided in section 2.1.3.

Section a of State statute permits a trustee to divide a trust into two or more separate
trusts if the result does not substantially impair the rights of any beneficiary or have a
materially adverse effect on the achievement of the purposes of the trust. Further,
section b of State statute permits a court, with the consent of the trust beneficiaries, to

PLR-106500-15 3

modify the terms of the trust if the court concludes that modification is not inconsistent
with a material purpose of the trust.

Trust, through its trustee, proposes to divide Trust’s assets into two separate trusts
(“Successor Trusts”); where each Successor Trust will benefit Daughter and one of
Daughter’s two children and the descendants of such child. The trustee proposes to
effectuate this division pursuant to authority granted to it under State law and only after
approval of its action by a court of competent jurisdiction in State. The trustee will
allocate a 50 percent pro-rata portion of each of the assets of Trust to each of the
Successor Trusts. The provisions of each Successor Trust will continue to be governed
by the terms of Trust, except that so long as there is any living descendant within a
particular family line, distributions of income and principal will be limited to Daughter and
the descendants of that particular family line. In addition, Daughter’s distributions of
income or principal must come equally from both Successor Trusts. In all other
respects, the Successor Trusts will be identical to Trust. It has been represented that
there have not been any distributions from Trust described in section 2.1.3 of Settlor’s
will. It has been further represented that sufficient GST exemption has been allocated
to Trust such that Trust has a zero inclusion ratio.

The trustee and beneficiaries filed a petition for modification and division of Trust with
Court. On Date 3, Court issued an Order approving the modification and division
effective upon the receipt of rulings, set forth below, from the Internal Revenue Service.
A motion for supplemental order has been filed to make it clear that following the
division of Trust into Successor Trusts, any future distributions to Daughter will be made
from and charged equally to each Successor Trust.

RULINGS REQUESTED

  1. The modification and division of Trust into Successor Trusts will not alter the
    inclusion ratio of Trust, and each Successor Trust will have the same inclusion
    ratio as Trust for GST tax purposes.
  2. The modification and division of Trust into Successor Trusts will not create or
    result in a transfer of property subject to federal gift tax under § 2501 of the
    Internal Revenue Code (Code).
  3. The modification and division of Trust into Successor Trusts will not cause any
    portion of the assets of Trust or Successor Trusts to be includible in the gross
    estate of any beneficiary under §§ 2035, 2036, 2037, or 2038.
  4. The Successor Trusts will be treated as separate trusts for federal income tax
    purposes pursuant to § 643(f).
  5. The modification and division of Trust into Successor Trusts will not result in
    treating any Trust property as paid, credited, or distributed for purposes of § 661
    or § 1.661(a)-2(f) of the Income Tax Regulations, and so will not result in
    realization of any income, gain, or loss under §§ 661 or 662 by Trust, the
    Successor Trusts, or a beneficiary of any of the trusts. In addition, the

PLR-106500-15 4

  modifications and division of Trust into Successor Trusts will not result in the
  realization of any income, gain or loss to Trust, the Successor Trusts, or a
  beneficiary of any of those trusts under § 61 or § 1001.
  1. The modification and division of Trust into Successor Trusts will result in each
    Successor Trust holding its share of Trust’s property with the same basis as it
    had when owned by Trust at the time of the division into Successor Trusts under
    § 1015.

Ruling 1

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every GST. Under § 1433(a) of the Tax Reform Act of
1986 (Act), the GST tax is generally applicable to GSTs made after October 22, 1986.
However, under § 1433(b)(2)(A) of the Act and § 26.2601-1(b)(1)(i) of the
Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations, the tax does not apply to any GST from
a trust if the trust was irrevocable on September 25, 1985, and no addition (actual or
constructive) was made to the trust after that date.

Under § 2602, the amount of tax imposed under § 2601 is determined by multiplying the
taxable amount (the amount involved in the GST transfer) by the applicable rate. Under
§ 2641, the term “applicable rate” means the product of the maximum federal estate tax
rate in the year that the GST occurs and the inclusion ratio. Under § 2642(a)(1), the
inclusion ratio with respect to any property transferred in a GST is 1 minus the
applicable fraction. Under § 2642(a)(2), in general, the numerator of the applicable
fraction is the amount of GST exemption allocated to the property transferred and the
denominator is the value of the property transferred.

Section 2631(a) in effect for the date of the transfer provides that for purposes of
determining the inclusion ratio, every individual is allowed a GST exemption of
$1,000,000 which may be allocated by the individual or the individual's executor to any
property with respect to which the individual is the transferor.

Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i) provides rules for determining when a modification, judicial
construction, settlement agreement, or trustee action with respect to a trust that is
exempt from the GST tax under § 26.2601-1(b) will not cause the trust to lose its
exempt status. These rules are applicable only for purposes of determining whether an
exempt trust retains exempt status for GST tax purposes. The rules do not apply in
determining, for example, whether the transaction results in a gift subject to gift tax, or
may cause the trust to be included in the gross estate of a beneficiary, or may result in
the realization of capital gain for purposes of § 1001.

Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(D) provides that a modification of the governing instrument
by judicial reformation or nonjudicial reformation that is valid under applicable state law
will not cause an exempt trust to be subject to the GST tax, if the modification does not
shift a beneficial interest in the trust to any beneficiary who occupies a lower generation

PLR-106500-15 5

(as defined in § 2651) than the person or persons who held the beneficial interest prior
to the modification, and the modification does not extend the time for vesting of any
beneficial interest in the trust beyond the period provided for in the original trust. A
modification of an exempt trust will result in a shift in a beneficial interest to a lower
generation beneficiary if the modification can result in either an increase in the amount
of a GST or the creation of a new GST.

Section 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(E), Example 5, provides as follows. In 1980, Grantor
established an irrevocable trust for the benefit of his two children, A and B, and their
issue. Under the terms of the trust, the trustee has the discretion to distribute income
and principal to A, B, and their issue in such amounts as the trustee deems appropriate.
On the death of the last to die of A and B, the trust principal is to be distributed to the
living issue of A and B, per stirpes. In 2002, the appropriate local court approved the
division of the trust into two equal trusts, one for the benefit of A and A's issue and one
for the benefit of B and B's issue. The trust for A and A's issue provides that the trustee
has the discretion to distribute trust income and principal to A and A's issue in such
amounts as the trustee deems appropriate. On A's death, the trust principal is to be
distributed equally to A's issue, per stirpes. If A dies with no living descendants, the
principal will be added to the trust for B and B's issue. The trust for B and B's issue is
identical (except for the beneficiaries), and terminates at B's death at which time the
trust principal is to be distributed equally to B's issue, per stirpes. If B dies with no living
descendants, principal will be added to the trust for A and A's issue. The division of the
trust into two trusts does not shift any beneficial interest in the trust to a beneficiary who
occupies a lower generation (as defined in § 2651) than the person or persons who held
the beneficial interest prior to the division. In addition, the division does not extend the
time for vesting of any beneficial interest in the trust beyond the period provided for in
the original trust. Therefore, the two partitioned trusts resulting from the division will not
be subject to the provisions of chapter 13.

In the instant case, Trust became irrevocable after September 25, 1985. It is
represented that sufficient GST exemption was allocated to Trust so that Trust has an
inclusion ratio of zero under § 2642. No guidance has been issued concerning changes
that may affect the status of trusts that are exempt from GST tax because sufficient
GST exemption was allocated to the trust to result in an inclusion ratio of zero. At a
minimum, a change that would not affect the GST status of a grandfathered trust should
similarly not affect the exempt status of such a trust.

The proposed modification and division of Trust into Successor Trusts is similar to the
facts in Example 5 of § 26.2601-1(b)(4)(i)(E). Therefore, the proposed modifications
and division (i) will not result in a shift of any beneficial interest in Trust to any
beneficiary who occupies a lower generation (as defined in § 2651) than the person or
persons holding the beneficial interests prior to the division, and (ii) will not extend the
time for vesting of any beneficial interest beyond the period provided for under Trust.
Accordingly, based upon the facts submitted and the representations made, we

PLR-106500-15 6

conclude that the modification and division of the Trust into Successor Trusts will not
alter the inclusion ratio of Trust and the Successor Trusts will each have the same
inclusion ratio as Trust for GST tax purposes.

Ruling 2

Section 2501 imposes a tax for each calendar year on the transfer of property by gift
during such calendar year by any individual.

Section 2511(a) provides that the gift tax applies whether the transfer is in trust or
otherwise, whether the gift is direct or indirect, and whether the property transferred is
real or personal, tangible or intangible.

In this case, the proposed modification and division of Trust does not increase,
decrease, or otherwise change any beneficiary's beneficial interest in Trust.
Accordingly, based upon the facts submitted and the representations made, the
modification and division of Trust into Successor Trusts will not create or result in a
transfer of property subject to federal gift tax under § 2501.

Ruling 3

Section 2033 provides that the value of the gross estate includes the value of all
property to the extent of the interest therein of the decedent at the time of his death.

Section 2035(a) provides that if (1) the decedent transferred an interest in property or
relinquished a power with respect to any property, during the 3-year period ending on
the date of the decedent’s death, and (2) the value of the property (or interest therein)
would have been included in the gross estate under §§ 2036, 2037, 2038, or 2042 if the
interest or power had been retained by the decedent on the date of death, then the
value of the gross estate shall include the value of any property (or interest therein) that
would have been so included. Under § 2035(b), the gross estate shall be increased by
the amount of any gift tax paid by the decedent or his estate on any gift made by the
decedent or his spouse during the 3-year period ending on the date of the decedent’s
death.

Section 2036(a) provides that the value of the gross estate shall include the value of all
property to the extent of any interest therein of which the decedent has at any time
made a transfer (except in the case of a bona fide sale for an adequate consideration in
money or money’s worth), by trust or otherwise, under which the decedent has retained
for his life or for any period not ascertainable without reference to the decedent’s death
or for any period which does not in fact end before the decedent’s death (1) the
possession or enjoyment of, or the right to the income from, the property, or (2) the
right, either alone or in conjunction with any person, to designate the persons who shall
possess or enjoy the property or the income therefrom.

PLR-106500-15 7

Section 2037(a) provides that the value of the gross estate shall include the value of all
property to the extent of any interest therein of which the decedent has at any time
made a transfer (except in the case of a bona fide sale for an adequate and full
consideration in money or money’s worth), by trust or otherwise, if (1) the possession or
enjoyment thereof can, through ownership of such interest, be obtained only by
surviving the decedent, and (2) the decedent has retained a reversionary interest in the
property and the value of the reversionary interest immediately before the death of the
decedent exceeds 5 percent of the value of the property.

Section 2038(a)(1) provides that the value of the gross estate shall include the value of
all property to the extent of any interest therein of which the decedent has at any time
made a transfer (except in case of a bona fide sale for an adequate and full
consideration in money or money’s worth), by trust or otherwise, where the enjoyment
thereof was subject at the date of the decedent’s death to any change through the
exercise of a power (in whatever capacity exercisable) by the decedent alone or by the
decedent in conjunction with any other person (without regard to when or from what
source the decedent acquired such power), to alter, amend, revoke, or terminate, or
where any such power is relinquished during the 3-year period ending on the date of the
decedent’s death.

In order for §§ 2035 through 2038 to apply, a decedent must have made a transfer of
property or any interest therein (except in the case of a bona fide sale for an adequate
consideration in money or money’s worth) under which the decedent retained an
interest in, or power over, the income or corpus of the transferred property. The
beneficiaries of the Successor Trusts have the same interests after the modification and
division as they had prior to the modification and division. Therefore, nothing will be
transferred by them by reason of the proposed modification and division.
Accordingly, based upon the facts submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that the modification and division of Trust into Successor Trusts will not cause
any portion of the assets of Trust or Successor Trusts to be includible in the gross
estate of any beneficiary under §§ 2035, 2036, 2037 or 2038.

Ruling 4

Section 643(f) provides that, for purposes of subchapter J of chapter 1 of subtitle A,
under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, two or more trusts shall be treated as
one trust if (1) such trusts have substantially the same grantor or grantors and
substantially the same primary beneficiary or beneficiaries, and (2) a principal purpose
of such trusts is the avoidance of the tax imposed by chapter 1.

Section 1806(b) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 provides that § 643(f) shall apply to
taxable years beginning after March 1, 1984; except that, in the case of a trust that was

PLR-106500-15 8

irrevocable on March 1, 1984, it shall apply only to that portion of the trust that is
attributable to contributions of corpus after March 1, 1984.

Successor Trusts will each have different primary beneficiaries. We conclude that as
long as each Successor Trust created by the division of Trust is separately managed
and administered, they will be treated as separate trusts for federal income tax
purposes.

Ruling 5

Section 61(a) defines gross income as all income from whatever source derived.

Section 61(a)(3) provides that gross income includes gains derived from dealings in
property.

Section 661(a) provides that in any taxable year a deduction is allowed in computing the
taxable income of a trust (other than a trust to which subpart B applies), for the sum of
(1) the amount of income for such taxable year required to be distributed currently; and
(2) any other amounts properly paid or credited or required to be distributed for such
taxable year.

Section 1.661(a)-2(f) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that gain or loss is
realized by the trust or estate (or the other beneficiaries) by reason of a distribution of
property in kind if the distribution is in satisfaction of a right to receive a distribution of a
specific dollar amount, of specific property other than that distributed, or of income as
defined under § 643(b) and the applicable regulations, if income is required to be
distributed currently.

Section 662 provides that there shall be included in the gross income of a beneficiary to
whom an amount specified in § 661(a) is paid, credited, or required to be distributed (by
an estate or trust described in § 661), the sum of the following amounts: (1) the amount
of income for the taxable year required to be distributed currently to such beneficiary,
whether distributed or not; and (2) all other amounts properly paid, credited, or required
to be distributed to such beneficiary for the taxable year.

Section 1001(a) provides that the gain from the sale or other disposition of property is
the excess of the amount realized over the adjusted basis provided in § 1011 for
determining gain, and the loss is the excess of the adjusted basis provided in § 1011 for
determining loss over the amount realized.

Section 1001(b) defines the amount realized from the sale or disposition of property as
the sum of any money received plus the fair market value of any property received.

PLR-106500-15 9

Section 1001(c) provides that, except as otherwise provided in subtitle A, the entire
amount of gain or loss determined under § 1001 on the sale or exchange of property
must be recognized.

Section 1.1001-1(a) provides that, except as provided in subtitle A, the gain or loss
realized from the exchange of property for cash or for other property differing materially
either in kind or in extent is treated as income of loss sustained.

An exchange of property results in the realization of gain under § 1001 if the properties
exchanged are materially different. Cottage Savings Association v. Commissioner, 499
U.S. 554 (1991). There is a material difference when the exchanged properties embody
legal entitlement “different in kind or extent” or if they confer “different rights and
powers.” 499 U.S. at 565.

Rev. Rul. 56-437, 1956-2 C.B. 507, holds that a partition of jointly owned property is not
a sale or other disposition of property where the co-owners of the property sever their
joint interests in order to extinguish their survivorship interests.

Trustee will divide Trust by allocating a pro rata portion of each and every asset of Trust
to the two Successor Trusts. Since the trust beneficiaries will hold essentially the same
interests before and after the division of Trust into the Successor Trusts, there will be no
exchange of property interests that can be characterized as materially different under
§ 1001, nor any amount includible in gross income under § 61.

Moreover, § 1.1001-1(h) provides that the pro rata division (or severance) of any trust
pursuant to authority in an applicable state statute is not an exchange of property
differing materially either in kind or extent. In this case, section a of State statute
permits such division of Trust.

Therefore, based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that
the division of Trust into two separate trusts is not a distribution under § 661 or
§ 1.661(a)-2(f). We further conclude that the proposed division of Trust’s assets among
the two new trusts will not cause Trust, the two new trusts, or the beneficiaries to
recognize any income, gain, or loss under §§ 61, 662, and 1001.

Ruling 6

Section 1015(a) provides that if the property was acquired by gift, the basis shall be the
same as it would be in the hands of the donor or the last preceding owner by whom it
was not acquired by gift, except that if the basis (adjusted for the period before the date
of the gift as provided in § 1016) is greater than the fair market value of the property at
the time of the gift then for the purpose of determining loss the basis shall be the fair
market value.

PLR-106500-15 10

Section 1.1015-2(a)(1) provides that in the case of property acquired after December
31, 1920, by transfer in trust (other than by a transfer in trust by gift, bequest, or devise)
the basis of property so acquired is the same as it would be in the hands of the grantor
increased in the amount of gain or decreased in the amount of loss recognized to the
grantor on the transfer under the law applicable to the year in which the transfer was
made. If the taxpayer acquired the property by a transfer in trust, the basis applies
whether the property be in the hands of the trustee, or the beneficiary, and whether
acquired prior to the termination of the trust and distribution of the property, or
thereafter.

Based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that because
§ 1001 does not apply to the division of the trust assets, under § 1015 the basis of the
trust assets will be the same after the modification and division of Trust as the basis of
those assets before the modification and division.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to Trust’s authorized representative.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    Faith P. Colson
                                    Faith P. Colson
                                    Senior Counsel, Branch 1
                                    Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                    (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.