Bank processing error justified IRA rollover waiver
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A surviving spouse instructed a bank employee to roll distributions from two inherited IRAs into another IRA. The transfer failed because the bank employee did not provide a required letter of acceptance to the institution holding the original accounts, and the spouse learned of the problem only after receiving a Form 1099-R. The bank employee acknowledged the processing error, and the spouse represented that the funds remained unused in her checking account. The IRS waived the 60-day deadline under section 408(d)(3)(I) and gave her 60 days from the ruling’s issuance to contribute the amount to a rollover IRA.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the surviving spouse receive a rollover waiver after a bank employee failed to provide a required acceptance letter?
- Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to complete the rollover
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 72, 408(d)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
201524028
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
MAR 16 2015
SE:T:EP:RA:T:3
U.I.L. 408.03-00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Legend:
Taxpayer A = xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Individual B = xxxxxxxxxxxxx
IRA X = xxxxxxxxxxxxx
IRA Y = xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bank C = xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Company P = xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Amount D = xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Individual M = xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date 1 = xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date 2 = xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date 3 = xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear xxxxxxxxx:
This is in response to your request dated October 27, 2014, as supplemented by
correspondence dated February 5, 2015, submitted on your behalf, by your authorized
representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).
201524028
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested.
Taxpayer A, as beneficiary, received two distributions from IRA X and IRA Y totaling
Amount D maintained by Individual B, her deceased husband. Taxpayer A asserts that
her failure to accomplish a rollover of Amount D within the 60-day period prescribed by
section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due to an error committed by Individual M of Bank C
for not providing the necessary “Letter of Acceptance” to Company C.
Individual B maintained IRA X and IRA Y with Company P. On Date 1, Individual B
passed away and Taxpayer A decided to rollover the funds from IRA X and IRA Y to
another qualified IRA account with Bank C. Accordingly, Taxpayer A met with Individual
M of Bank C who completed the rollover forms and had Taxpayer A sign them on Date
- Taxpayer A relied on the advice of Individual M and thought that Amount D from IRA
X and IRA Y was rolled over timely as she instructed.
Taxpayer A represents that it was not until March, 2014, when she received a 2013
Form 1099-R from Company P that she became aware that Amount D was not rolled
over as she instructed. Taxpayer A called Company P and was advised that it did not
receive a “Letter of Acceptance”, from Individual M of Bank C, which is required to
facilitate the rollover. Taxpayer A states that neither she nor Individual M knew about
the “Letter of Acceptance”. Company P, also told Taxpayer A that on Date 3, Company
P called her, to verify where to send the funds which Taxpayer A recalls that she told
them to send the funds to her home address. At that time, Taxpayer A thought
Company P was referring to funds related to a death benefit and not the distributed
funds she instructed to be rolled over.
Amount D has not been used for any other purpose and is held in Taxpayer A’s
checking account with Bank C.
Documentation submitted by Individual M of Bank C acknowledged that an error
occurred when the transaction was processed as a distribution to Taxpayer A’s account.
Based on the foregoing facts and representations, you request that the Internal
Revenue Service (the “Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in
section 408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to Amount D.
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income
by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section
72 of the Code.
201524028
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if-
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the
day on which the individual received the payment or distribution; or
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid
into such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is
includible in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any
amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at
any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual
received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was
not included in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d)
do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).
Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.
Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R. B. 359, provides that in determining whether to grant a
waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service
will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a
financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability,
hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error;
(3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,
whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution
occurred.
201524028
The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent
with her assertion that her failure to accomplish a timely rollover was due to an error
committed by Individual M of Bank C.
Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the
60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount D from IRA X.
Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this letter ruling to
contribute Amount D into a rollover IRA. Provided all other requirements of Code
section 408(d)(3), except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such
contribution, the contribution of Amount D will be considered a rollover contribution
within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.
This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be distributed
by section 408(a)(6) of the Code.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transactions described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations, which may
be applicable thereto.
A copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative pursuant to a power
of attorney on file in this office.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
If you have any questions concerning this ruling, please contact xxxxxxxxxxxxx, at
xxxxxxxxxxx. All correspondence should be addressed to SE:T:EP:RA:T.
Sincerely yours,
Sherri M. Edelman, Manager
Employee Plans Technical
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of letter ruling
Notice of Intention to Disclose
cc:
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.