Amended return made late installment election effective
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A taxpayer sold S corporation stock for a down payment and contingent earn-out payments and consistently intended to report the entire gain in the year of sale rather than use the installment method. The taxpayer’s CPA gave incorrect instructions for making that election, and the error was discovered after the first earn-out payment. The taxpayer obtained an appraisal, began preparing a ruling request, and filed an amended sale-year return reporting the full gain to stop statutory interest. The IRS found good cause and no use of hindsight. It ruled that the amended return had made the late election effective, subject to the represented stock basis.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did an amended sale-year return make a late election out of installment reporting effective after incorrect CPA advice?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC § 453(d); Temp. Treas. Reg. § 15a.453-1(d)(3)(ii); Rev. Rul. 90-46
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201524012 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/12/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 453.00-00, 453.06-06
Person To Contact:
----------------------- --------------------, ID No. ---------
------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------------- --------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B04
PLR-134321-14
Date:
March 11, 2015
In re: ---------------------------------------------
LEGEND
S Corp = ----------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1 = ------
Year 2 = ------
Year 3 = ------
Year 4 = ------
Year 5 = ------
Year 6 = ------
Year 7 = ------
CPA = ------------------------
V = -------------------------------------------------
x = --------------
y = -------------
z = ----
Dear -----------------------------:
This is in reply to a letter submitted by your authorized representative requesting a
ruling on your behalf under § 453(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 15a.453-
1(d)(3)(ii) of the Temporary Regulations under the Installment Sales Revision Act of
1981. You are requesting permission to make a late election out of the installment
method for the sale of S Corp stock.
FACTS
PLR-134321-14 2
In Year 1, you incorporated your business as an S corporation and owned x percent of
the company stock. S Corp was engaged in business as a V. You use the cash
method of accounting and your annual accounting period is the calendar year.
In Year 2, you sold your S Corp stock for a share of a $y Down Payment and contingent
payment obligations (earn-out payments) to be received in Years 4, 5, 6 and 7.
On several occasions in Year 2 and Year 3, prior to filing your Year 2 Form 1040, you
had tax planning and tax return preparation conversations with CPA. Many of these
conversations dealt with the tax reporting of the sale of the stock. During these
conversations, CPA explained to you the pros and cons of using the installment method
to report the gain on the sale of your stock. Because of concerns about increased tax
rates on the dates of the earn-out payments, you informed CPA that you did not want to
use the installment method to report gain on the sale of the S Corp stock.
You understood that you were required to report the total amount of recognized gain
from the sale of the stock on the Year 2 Form 1040 to effectively elect out of the
installment method. CPA misinformed you on the correct way to elect out of the
installment method. He advised you to report the recognized gain from the Down
Payment in Year 2, and after receipt of the first earn-out payment in Year 4, to amend
the Year 2 Form 1040 to report the total amount of recognized gain on the sale of the
stock, including all future earn-out payments.1 You followed CPA’s advice that you
would effectively elect out of the installment method by initially reporting the Down
Payment on Schedule D instead of Form 6252, Installment Sale Income, on your
original Year 2 Form 1040.
After you received the first earn-out payment in Year 4, and while CPA was preparing
an amended return for Year 2, CPA realized that he misinformed you on the correct way
to effectively elect out of the installment method and that you would need a favorable
private letter ruling to effectively elect out of the installment method. Shortly thereafter,
you hired an appraiser to determine the fair market value of the contingent payment
obligations on the date of sale. After the appraisal was completed, preparation of this
ruling request commenced. Before filing this request for a private letter ruling, pursuant
to your CPA’s advice to stop the running of statutory interest, you filed your Year 2 Form
1040X in Year 5 to report the total amount of recognized gain on the sale of the stock.
You and CPA have submitted affidavits consistent with the above facts.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 453(a) provides that, except as otherwise provided, income from an installment
sale shall be taken into account under the installment method. Section 453(d)(1)
provides, however, that the installment method will not apply to a disposition if the
1
The correct way to elect out of an installment method that includes contingent payment obligations is to
report in the year of sale the amount realized as provided in § 1.1001-1(g) of the Income Tax Regulations.
See § 1.1001-1(g)(3).
PLR-134321-14 3
taxpayer elects to not have the installment method apply to such disposition. Under
§ 453(d)(2), except as otherwise provided by regulations, an election out of the
installment method with respect to a disposition may be made only on or before the due
date prescribed by law (including extensions) for filing the taxpayer’s return of tax for the
taxable year in which the disposition occurs.
Section 15a.453-1(d)(3) provides that the election out of the installment method must be
made in the manner prescribed by the appropriate forms for the taxpayer’s return for the
taxable year of the sale. A taxpayer who reports an amount realized equal to the selling
price including the full face amount of any installment obligation on the tax return filed
for the taxable year in which an installment sale occurs will be considered to have made
an effective election. A cash method taxpayer receiving an obligation with a fair market
value that is less than the face value must make the election as provided in the
appropriate instructions for the return filed for the taxable year of the sale.
Under § 15a.453-1(d)(3)(ii), elections after the due date prescribed by law (including
extensions) for filing the taxpayer’s return will be permitted only in those rare
circumstances when the Internal Revenue Service concludes that the taxpayer had
good cause for failing to make a timely election.
Based on your representations and the affidavits, you have shown that you always
intended to elect out of the installment method for the sale of the S Corp stock. Further,
you promptly filed this ruling request after you realized that an effective election out had
mistakenly not been made. We have determined that your request for an extension of
time to make the election out of the installment method does not involve hindsight and
that you have established good cause for an extension to file an election. See Situation
3 of Rev. Rul. 90-46, 1990-1 C.B. 107.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, based on the facts presented, the representations made, and provided that
your basis in the S Corp stock was $z, we grant you an extension to elect out of the
installment method for the sale of your S Corp stock, and conclude that you effected
that election when you filed your amended Year 2 Form 1040 in Year 5.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. For example, we do not express any opinion concerning whether you
properly computed the amount realized or the gain required to be recognized on the
sale of the S Corp stock.
You must attach a copy of this letter to any federal tax return to which it is relevant. If
you file the amended returns electronically, you may satisfy this requirement by
PLR-134321-14 4
attaching a statement to each of the amended returns that provides the date and control
number of this letter ruling.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, copies of this letter are
being sent to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Michael J. Montemurro
Chief, Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.