Estate received more time for 2010 carryover-basis election

Number
201523009
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Basis Rules Applicable to the Estates of Decedents Dying in 2010; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 165, § 172, § 1014, § 1022, § 1212, § 2210, § 6018, § 6110
Ruling dated
February 11, 2015
Publicly released
June 5, 2015

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The representative of an estate for a person who died in 2010 hired an attorney to prepare the required tax filings. The attorney failed to file Form 8939 by the deadline, so the estate did not timely elect the carryover-basis system under section 1022 or allocate the available basis increases. The IRS found that the estate reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional and satisfied the good-faith requirements for regulatory relief. It granted 120 days from the ruling date to file Form 8939, make the section 1022 election, and allocate additional basis to eligible property.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could a 2010 decedent’s estate make a late section 1022 carryover-basis election after its attorney missed the filing deadline?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 120 days to file Form 8939
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1022; Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Notices 2011-66 and 2011-76

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201523009
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/5/2015
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1022.00-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------- --------------------------- -------------------------
-------------------------
-----------------
---------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------
In Re: --------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B04
PLR-136860-14
Date: FEBRUARY 11, 2015

Legend

Decedent
--------------------------------------------
Attorney
----------------

Dear ------------:

This letter responds to your personal representative’s letter of September 30, 2014, requesting an extension of time pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file a Form 8939, Allocation of Increase in Basis for Property Acquired from a Decedent, to make the Section 1022 Election and to allocate basis provided by § 1022 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to eligible property transferred as a result of Decedent’s death.

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows:

Decedent died in 2010. The personal representative of Decedent’s estate retained Attorney to prepare the necessary tax filings for the estate. Attorney failed to prepare the Form 8939 before the filing deadline of January 17, 2012. Consequently, the executor failed to make a Section 1022 Election for Decedent’s estate.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1022(a) provides that property acquired from a decedent who died after December 31, 2009, is treated as transferred by gift, and the basis of the person acquiring the property from such a decedent is the lesser of the adjusted basis of the decedent or the fair market value of the property at the date of the decedent's death.

Section 1022(b)(1) provides, in general, that the basis of property under § 1022(a) is increased by basis increase that is allocated to the property.
PLR-136860-14
2

Section 1022(b)(2)(A) provides, in general, that basis increase is the portion of the aggregate basis increase that is allocated to the property.

Section 1022(b)(2)(B) and (C) provide that the aggregate basis increase is $1,300,000; and that the aggregate basis increase is increased by--(i) the sum of the amount of any capital loss carryover under § 1212(b), and the amount of any net operating loss carryover under § 172 that would (but for the decedent's death) be carried from the decedent's last taxable year to a later taxable year of the decedent, plus (ii) the sum of the amount of any losses that would have been allowable under § 165 if the property acquired from the decedent had been sold at fair market value immediately before the decedent's death.

Section 1022(c)(1) provides that in the case of property that is qualified spousal property, the basis of such property under § 1022(a) (as increased under § 1022(b)) is increased by spousal property basis increase allocated to the property.

Section 1022(c)(2)(A) provides, in general, that spousal property basis increase is the portion of the aggregate spousal property basis increase which is allocated to the property. Section 1022(c)(2)(B) provides that the aggregate spousal property basis increase is $3,000,000.

Section 1022(d)(1)(A) provides, in general, that the basis of property acquired from a decedent may be increased under § 1022(b) or (c) only if the property was owned by the decedent at the time of death. Section 1022(d)(1)(B) describes property that is considered to be owned by the decedent at the time of death.

Section 1022(d)(2) provides that the basis adjustments under §§ 1022(b) and (c) shall not increase the basis of any interest in property above its fair market value in the hands of the decedent as of the date of the decedent's death.

Section 1022(d)(3) provides, in general, that the executor is to allocate the basis adjustments under §§ 1022(b) and (c) on the return required by § 6018 and that any allocation made may be changed only as provided by the Secretary.

Section 1022(e) describes property that is considered to be acquired from the decedent for purposes of § 1022.

Subtitle A of title V of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, P.L. 107-16 (115 Stat. 76-81), enacted § 2210, which made chapter 11 (the estate tax) inapplicable to the estate of any decedent who died in 2010 and chapter 13 (the generation skipping transfer (GST) tax) inapplicable to generation-skipping transfers made in 2010. On December 17, 2010, Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (TRUIRJCA), P.L. 111-312 (124 Stat. 3296), became law, and § 301(a) of TRUIRJCA retroactively reinstated the estate and
PLR-136860-14
3

GST taxes. However, § 301(c) of TRUIRJCA allows the executor of the estate of a decedent who died in 2010 to elect to apply the Code as though § 301(a) of TRUIRJCA did not apply with respect to chapter 11 and for property acquired or passing from a decedent (within the meaning of § 1014(b)). Thus, § 301(c) of TRUIRJCA allows the executor of the estate of a decedent who died in 2010 to elect not to have the provisions of chapter 11 apply to the decedent’s estate, but rather, to have the provisions of § 1022 apply (the Section 1022 Election).

Notice 2011-66, 2011-35 I.R.B. 184, section I.A. provides that the executor of the estate of a decedent who died in 2010 makes the Section 1022 Election by filing a Form 8939 on or before November 15, 2011. Notice 2011-76, 2011-40 I.R.B. 479, extended the due date of the Form 8939 and thus, the election, from November 15, 2011 to January 17, 2012.

Notice 2011-66, section I.D.1, provides that the Internal Revenue Service will not grant extensions of time to file a Form 8939 and will not accept a Form 8939 filed after the due date except in four limited circumstances provided in section I.D.2. Under this section of Notice 2011-66, an executor may apply for relief under § 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose date is prescribed by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute).

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, the personal representatives of Decedent’s estate are granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make the Section 1022 Election on a Form 8939 and allocate additional basis to eligible property as provided by § 1022. A copy of this letter should be attached to the Form 8939.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we have sent a copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.
PLR-136860-14
4

Except as expressly provided herein, we neither express nor imply any opinion concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Associate Chief Counsel
Passthroughs and Special Industries

_______
By: Lorraine E. Gardner
Senior Counsel, Branch 4
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures
Copy for § 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace