Adviser and custodian errors justified two rollover waivers
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An IRA owner took one distribution after his longtime CPA incorrectly said an earlier rollover was an excess contribution. A financial institution separately ignored his direction to roll another IRA into his employer plan and instead placed the money in a taxable account. He discovered both errors after receiving IRS notices and returned each original amount plus earnings to an IRA. The IRS waived the 60-day deadline for the two original distributions because one resulted from erroneous professional advice and the other from a financial institution error. The waivers did not cover the earnings, which remained subject to the ordinary IRA contribution limits.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could an IRA owner receive two rollover waivers for separate adviser and financial institution errors?
- Outcome: Approved for the original distributed amounts, but not for earnings
- Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3)(I); Rev. Proc. 2003-16
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
201522011
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
MAR 03 2015
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
SE:T:EP:RA:T1
LEGEND:
Taxpayer A =
IRA B =
Financial Institution C =
Account D =
IRA E =
Financial Institution F =
Retirement Plan G =
Account H =
Amount 1 =
Amount 2 =
Amount 3 =
Amount 4 =
Dear
This is in response to your letter dated June 24, 2014, supplemented by
correspondence dated October 14, and December 23, 2014, sent on your behalf by
201522011
your authorized representative, in which you request waivers of the 60-day rollover
requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested:
Taxpayer A represents that he received a distribution from IRA B of Amount 1.
Taxpayer A represents that he also received a distribution from IRA E of Amount 2.
Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish rollovers within the 60-day period
prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due to his reliance on the mistaken
advice of his certified public accountant (CPA), with regard to Amount 1, and an error
made by a representative of Financial Institution F, with regard to Amount 2. Taxpayer
A maintains that he has not used the amounts for any other purpose.
Taxpayer A opened IRA B with Financial Institution C on October 11, 2011, by
transferring Amount 1 from another eligible retirement plan. Although IRA B was
opened properly, in the course of preparing his income taxes for 2012, Taxpayer A’s
CPA mistakenly believed Amount 1 represented contributions to a “new” IRA and not an
eligible rollover contribution. His CPA then mistakenly advised Taxpayer A that he was
not eligible to make new contributions to an IRA, because he was already participating
in a company-sponsored retirement plan and if Amount 1 remained in IRA B, it would be
treated as an excess contribution. Acting on his CPA’s advice, Taxpayer A transferred
Amount 1 to Account D, a non-IRA account with Financial Institution C, on March 1,
2012.
Taxpayer A’s CPA provided a signed statement indicating that he has been providing
tax advice to Taxpayer A for 20 years and that he advised Taxpayer A to take the
distribution from IRA B. Taxpayer A represents that he did not learn of the error until he
received a CP2000 notice from the IRS in 2014. Upon learning of the error, Taxpayer A
transferred Amount 3 (Amount 1 plus earnings) back to IRA B where it remains.
With regard to Amount 2, Taxpayer A maintained IRA E with Financial Institution F.
Financial Institution F is also the custodian for Taxpayer A’s employer-sponsored
qualified retirement plan, Retirement Plan G. Taxpayer A represents that in March
2012, he directed the representative at Financial Institution F, with whom he regularly
worked, to transfer Amount 2 from IRA E to Retirement Plan G, as part of a rollover
from one eligible retirement plan to another. However, Taxpayer A represents that the
representative failed to follow his direction and instead placed Amount 2 into Account H,
a new, taxable account with Financial Institution F, without Taxpayer A’s knowledge.
Taxpayer A represents that he did not learn of the mistake until receiving a CP2000 in
2014. Upon receipt of the notice, Taxpayer A represents that he transferred Amount 4
(Amount 2 plus earnings) back to IRA E.
201522011
Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue
Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the
Code with respect to the distributions of Amount 1 and Amount 2.
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d) of the Code, any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in
gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided
under section 72 of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if-
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th
day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or
distribution; or
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of
such individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the
payment or distribution is received, except that the maximum amount
which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the
amount received which is includible in gross income (determined
without regard to section 408(d)(3) of the Code).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any
amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at
any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual
received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was
not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d)
do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).
Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
201522011
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.
Revenue Procedure 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, (January 27, 2003) provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement under section
408(d)(3)(I), the IRS will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1)
errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to
death, disability or hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign
country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of
payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the
distribution occurred.
The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent
with his assertion that his failure to accomplish a timely rollover of Amount 1 within the
60-day period was due to his reliance on the erroneous advice of his CPA and, with
respect to Amount 2, the failure resulted from an error committed by his financial
advisor at Financial Institution F.
Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the
60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 1 from IRA B and
Amount 2 from IRA E. Provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3) of the Code,
except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to the contributions, the
contribution of Amount 1 on May 5, 2014, to IRA B will be considered a valid rollover
contribution and the contribution of Amount 2 to IRA E on May 14, 2014, will be
considered a valid rollover contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of the
Code. Note, however, that the waivers do not apply to earnings on Amount 1 or
Amount 2. Therefore, the transfers of any amounts representing earnings are
considered IRA contributions under section 408(a)(1) of the Code subject to the rules
and limits that pertain thereto.
This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be distributed
by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations, which may
be applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a
Power of Attorney (Form 2848) on file with this office.
201522011
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact xxxXxxxXxXxXxXxXxXxXxXxXx
(I.D. #xxxxXxXXXXXXX) at (XXX) XXX-XXXX. Please address all correspondence to
SE:T:EP:RA:T1.
Sincerely yours,
Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of Ruling Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
CC:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.