Private Letter Ruling 201521008 Released May 22, 2015 Approved

Parent receives more time for a deconsolidation basis election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A consolidated group parent transferred loss stock of one subsidiary to a related corporation, causing the subsidiary to leave the group. To prevent some or all of the stock-basis reduction otherwise required by Treasury Regulation section 1.337(d)-2, the parent needed to file a section 1.337(d)-2(c) statement with the return for the deconsolidation year. The statement was missed because the parent reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to file it or advise that it was needed. The parent sought relief before the IRS discovered the omission and established that it acted reasonably and in good faith. The IRS granted 60 days from the ruling date to file the election, subject to the condition that aggregate tax liability not be lower than if the election had been timely made.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the parent receive more time to file the statement preventing a deconsolidation basis reduction?
  • Outcome: Approved, the parent received 60 days to file the election.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.337(d)-2(c), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3; IRC §§ 351, 358, and 362(e)(2)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201521008 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/22/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 337.16-01, 9100.29-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------- ------------------------, ID No. --------------
-------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:01
PLR-135370-14
Date:
January 23, 2015

Legend

Parent = -----------------------------------------------------------------------


Sub 1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------


Sub 2 = ----------------------------------------------------------------


State A = --------------

Date 1 = ------------------------

Date 2 = ----------------------------

Date 3 = ---------------------------

Parent Official = -----------------------------------------------------------------------


Former Parent Official = -----------------------------------------------------------------------


PLR-135370-14 2

Dear ---------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated September 19, 2014, requesting an extension of
time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations to file an election. In particular, Parent is requesting an extension of time to
file a statement under § 1.337(d)-2(c) of the Income Tax Regulations to prevent some or
all of a reduction in basis in the stock of a subsidiary upon the deconsolidation of the
subsidiary (the “Election”). The material information submitted in that letter and in
subsequent correspondence is summarized below.

Parent is a State A corporation and the common parent of a group of affiliated
corporations that join in filing a consolidated U.S. Federal income tax return (the “Parent
Consolidated Group”). On Date 1, Parent acquired all of the outstanding common stock
of Sub 1 (the “Sub 1 Stock”) for cash. On Date 2, when the fair market value of the Sub
1 Stock was less than Parent’s aggregate tax basis in the Sub 1 Stock, Parent
transferred all of the Sub 1 Stock to Sub 2 (a related corporation that was not a member
of the Parent Consolidated Group) solely in exchange for Sub 2 preferred stock in a
transaction to which section 351 applied (the “Exchange”). Parent recognized no gain
or loss on the Exchange. As a result of the Exchange, Sub 1 ceased to be a member of
the Parent Consolidated Group at the end of the day on Date 2.

Under section 358, Parent’s tax basis in the Sub 2 preferred stock received in the
Exchange equaled Parent’s tax basis in the Sub 1 Stock immediately before the
Exchange. Parent and Sub 2 did not make an election under section 362(e)(2)(C) to
reduce Parent’s tax basis in the Sub 2 preferred stock; instead, Sub 2 reduced its tax
basis in the Sub 1 Stock under section 362(e)(2)(A).

To avoid reducing Parent’s tax basis in the Sub 1 Stock under § 1.337(d)-2(b) to an
amount equal to its fair market value immediately before the Exchange, Parent was
required to file the Election with or as part of the Parent Consolidated Group’s tax return
for the tax year that ended on Date 3. However, for various reasons, the Election was
not filed. After the due date for the Election, Parent and its tax advisors discovered that
the Election had not been filed. Subsequently, this request was submitted under
§ 301.9100-3 for an extension of time to file the Election. Parent has represented that
Parent is not seeking to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has
been or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the request for relief was submitted.

Section 1.337(d)-2(a)(1) provides a general rule that no deduction is allowed for any
loss recognized by a member of a consolidated group with respect to the disposition of
stock of a subsidiary.

Section 1.337(d)-2(b)(1) provides a general rule that if the basis of a member of a
consolidated group in a share of stock of a subsidiary exceeds its value immediately
PLR-135370-14 3

before a deconsolidation of the share, the basis of the share is reduced at that time to
an amount equal to its value.

Section 1.337(d)-2(b)(2) provides that deconsolidation means any event that causes a
share of stock of a subsidiary that remains outstanding to be no longer owned by a
member of any consolidated group of which the subsidiary is also a member.

Section 1.337(d)-2(c)(2) provides that loss is not disallowed under § 1.337(d)-2(a)(1)
and basis is not reduced under § 1.337-2(b)(1) to the extent the taxpayer establishes
that the loss or basis is not attributable to the recognition of built-in gain, net of directly
related expenses, on the disposition of an asset (including stock and securities).

Section 1.337(d)-2(c)(1) provides that § 1.337(d)-2(c) applies with respect to stock of a
subsidiary only if a separate statement entitled “§ 1.337(d)-2(c) statement” is included
with the return in accordance with § 1.337(d)-2(c)(3).

Section 1.337(d)-2(c)(3) provides that the statement required under § 1.337(d)-2(c)(1)
must be included with or as part of the taxpayer’s return for the year of the disposition or
deconsolidation.

In general, § 1.337(d)-2 applies with respect to dispositions and deconsolidations on or
after March 3, 2005 and before September 17, 2008.

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election.
Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for
making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making
regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Requests for
relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to
establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably
and in good faith and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
government. Section 301.9100-3(a).

In this case, the time for filing the Election is fixed by the regulations (i.e., § 1.337(d)-
2(c)(3)). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-3
to grant an extension of time for Parent to file the Election, provided Parent establishes
that it acted reasonably and in good faith, that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and
301.9100-3 are satisfied, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
government.
PLR-135370-14 4

Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Parent, Parent Official, and
Former Parent Official explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file
the Election. The information establishes that Parent reasonably relied on a qualified
tax professional who failed to file, or advise Parent to file, the Election, and that the
request for relief was filed before the failure to timely file the Election was discovered by
the Internal Revenue Service. See §§ 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i) and (v).

Based on the facts and information submitted, including the affidavits submitted and the
representations made, we conclude that Parent has established that it acted reasonably
and in good faith in failing to timely file the Election, that the requirements of
§§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and that granting relief will not prejudice
the interests of the government. Accordingly, we grant an extension of time under
§ 301.9100-3, until sixty (60) days from the date on this letter, for Parent to file the
Election.

The above extension of time is conditioned on the Parent Consolidated Group’s tax
liability, if any, being not lower, in the aggregate, for all years to which the Election
applies, than it would have been if the Election had been timely made (taking into
account the time value of money). We express no opinion as to the Parent
Consolidated Group’s tax liability for the years involved. A determination thereof will be
made by the Director’s office upon audit of the Federal income tax returns involved.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. In particular, we express no opinion with respect to whether Parent qualifies
substantively to make the Election. In addition, we express no opinion as to the tax
effects or consequences of filing the Election late under the provisions of any other
section of the Code or regulations, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions existing
at the time of, or effects resulting from, filing the Election late that are not specifically set
forth in the above ruling.

For purposes of granting relief under § 301.9100-3, we have relied on certain
statements and representations made by Parent, Parent Official, and Former Parent
Official under penalties of perjury. However, the Director should verify all essential
facts. Moreover, notwithstanding that an extension is granted under § 301.9100-3 to file
the Election, any penalties and interest that otherwise would be applicable still apply.

This ruling letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
PLR-135370-14 5

attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

                                     Sincerely,


                                     Ken Cohen
                                     Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
                                     Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.