Private Letter Ruling 201520001 Released May 15, 2015 Approved

Subsidiary may use a calendar year within a 52-53 week group

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A consolidated group used a 52-53 week taxable year, but one subsidiary wanted to change to a calendar year. The subsidiary owned controlled foreign corporations whose foreign-law partnerships could not use a year longer than 12 months, creating burdensome computations when their years differed. The parent represented that every group member's year would end within the same seven-day period and that consolidated items and deferred intercompany transactions would be handled consistently. The IRS granted consent under Treasury Regulation section 1.1502-76 for the subsidiary to continue joining the consolidated return while using a calendar year. The ruling was conditioned on the group continuing to satisfy the section 1504 affiliation requirements.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a subsidiary use a calendar year while continuing to join a consolidated group that uses a 52-53 week year?
  • Outcome: Approved, consent was granted for the different taxable year.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 441, 898, 957, 1502, and 1504; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.441-2 and 1.1502-76; Rev. Rul. 72-184

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201520001 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/15/2015 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1502.76-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------- ------------------------, ID No. ----------------
-------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------ --------------------
-------------------------- Refer Reply To:
--------------------------- CC:CORP:B01
In Re: PLR-126286-14
------------------------------ Date:
December 22, 2014

LEGEND:

Parent = --------------------------------------


Sub 1 = -----------------------------------

Business A = -------------------------------------------------

Country X = ----------

Dear -------------------------:

   This letter responds to your request for a ruling, dated July 3, 2014, in which the

advance consent of the Commissioner is requested for the continued filing of a
consolidated return by Parent and its subsidiaries, although Sub 1 will use a different
taxable year than the other members of the consolidated group. Additional information
was supplied in letters dated October 16, November 4, and December 5, 2014. The
information submitted is summarized below.

                                         Summary of Facts

   Parent is the common parent of a consolidated group (Group) engaged in

Business A. Parent uses a 52-53 week year ending on the last Saturday in December.
Sub 1, a member of Group, presently uses the same taxable year as Parent. Sub 1
wholly owns foreign subsidiaries in Country X that are controlled foreign corporations
(CFCs) as defined in section 957(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
PLR-126286-14 2

    The CFCs owned by Sub 1 are partners in Country X partnerships. Under

Country X law, these partnerships cannot have a calendar year that exceeds 12
months. This restriction makes the partnerships unable to have a 52-53 week taxable
year. Under recent changes in Country X law, the CFCs as partners are required to
make burdensome computations if they wish to have a 52-53 week taxable year. As a
result, the CFCs have changed to a calendar year. To avoid difficult computations due
to the difference between the CFCs calendar years and Sub 1’s 52-53 week year, Sub 1
wants to change Sub 1’s taxable year to a calendar year.

                                Representations

   Parent has submitted the following representations:

   (a)   The tax years of all members of Group will end within the same 7-day

period.

   (b)    The use of a 52-53 week taxable year will clearly reflect the consolidated

income of Group. The members of Group using a 52-53 week taxable year will
determine depreciation, amortization, state and local franchise and property taxes,
vacation pay accruals, and items of a similar nature as though their taxable year
consisted of 12 calendar months, in accordance with the principles of Treas. Reg.
§ 1.441-2(d).

    (c)     Any deferred intercompany transaction between members of Group will be

accounted for in the same consolidated return year even though the use of a 52-53
week taxable year by certain members may cause a transaction to occur on a day
falling in different consolidated return years of the members involved. In such a case,
the taxable year of the selling member will be used to determine the consolidated return
year in which a transaction has occurred. See Rev. Rul. 72-184, 1972-1 C.B. 289.

   (d)     If deferred gain must be restored under the rules of § 1.1502-13, the

consolidated return year of the member causing the restoration will control. If, because
of the selling member’s method of accounting, the deferred gain or loss would not
otherwise be recognized until a later taxable year, the selling member nevertheless will
take into account the gain or loss in the consolidated return year of the member causing
such restoration. See Rev. Rul. 72-184.

    (e) If consent is granted for Sub 1 to change its annual accounting period to a

calendar year end, then the CFCs will adopt the taxable year that results in the least
deferral of income to all U.S. shareholders, as defined in Prop. Reg. § 1.898-3(a)(4)(i)
and illustrated in Example 2 of Prop. Reg. § 1.898-3(a)(4)(iii).
PLR-126286-14 3

                                       Ruling

   Based solely on the information submitted, and provided that the affiliation

requirement s of section 1504 of the Code are met, consent is granted under § 1.1502-
76 of the regulations for Sub 1 to file a consolidated return with Parent using a calendar
year.

                                      Caveats

   We express no opinion as to the tax effects or consequences of Sub 1’s taxable

year under any other provisions of the Code or regulations, or as to the tax treatment of
any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, Sub 1’s taxable year that
are not specifically set forth in the above ruling.

                              Procedural Statements

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

   A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is

relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control
number of the letter ruling.

     In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to two of your authorized representatives.

                                               Sincerely,



                                               _Isaac W. Zimbalist_____
                                               Isaac W. Zimbalist
                                               Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
                                               Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                               (Corporate)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.