Private Letter Ruling 201519043 Released May 8, 2015 Approved Transcribed from scan

False assurances about IRA status qualify for rollover relief

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2015, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2015
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer directed an IRA distribution into an investment fund after the fund's officer and financial institution assured him that the investment would be held as a new IRA. He raised the tax issue during the 60-day period and was told that the fund would issue Form 5498 documenting the rollover. The institution later disclosed that neither it nor the fund could serve as an IRA custodian. The taxpayer kept the entire distribution invested in the fund and did not use it for another purpose. The IRS found that the missed deadline resulted from the false assurances and waived the 60-day rollover requirement.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer receive a waiver after being falsely assured that an investment fund qualified as an IRA account?
  • Outcome: Approved, the 60-day rollover deadline was waived.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(9), 408(a), and 408(d)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

201519043

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND FEB 11 2015

GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

T:EP:RA:T1

Legend

Taxpayer A =

IRA B =

Fund C =
Financial Institution E =
Financial Institution F =

Individual G =

Amount 1 =
Dear

This is in response to your request dated October 7, 2014, as supplemented by
correspondence dated December 19, 2014, and January 21, 2015, in which you
request, through your authorized representative, a waiver of the 60-day rollover
requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the
“Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayer A represents that he received a distribution equal to Amount 1 from
IRA B, which was maintained by Financial Institution E. Taxpayer A asserts that
his failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by section
408(d)(3)(A) of the Code was due to false assurances by Individual G and

2

201519043

Financial Institution F that Taxpayer A’s investment in Fund C constituted an IRA
account.

On April 16, 2013, Taxpayer A took a distribution from IRA B equal to Amount 1,
which amount was directly wired by Financial Institution E to Fund C. Fund C,
maintained by Financial Institution F, invests in selected international small cap
equities.

On April 23, 2013, Taxpayer A emailed Individual G, the Chief Operating Officer
at Financial Institution F, to confirm that Fund C had received Amount 1 and that
Amount 1 was deposited into an IRA account. In his email, Taxpayer A
expressed concern that, if the monies did not go into an IRA account with Fund
C, he would owe taxes. Taxpayer A also stated in the email that he wanted to
confirm that Amount 1 had been rolled over into an IRA in Fund C while there
was still time to correct any errors in effecting the rollover. In response to
Taxpayer A’s inquiries, Individual G confirmed Taxpayer A’s investment in a new
IRA in Fund C equal to Amount 1. Taxpayer A had also received assurances
from Individual G that Fund C would issue a Form 5498 to document the transfer
from IRA B to the “Taxpayer A IRA held in Fund C.”

While preparing his federal Income Tax Return for the 20-- year, Taxpayer A
received a Form 1099-R from Financial Institution E, which indicated an early
distribution from IRA B. Taxpayer A emailed Individual G asking for
documentation that Amount 1 was reinvested in an IRA account in Fund C.
Individual G stated that she would contact Financial Institution F’s accountants to
look into the matter. In March of 2014, Financial Institution F informed Taxpayer
A that neither Fund C nor Financial Institution F could act as a custodian for an
IRA. Taxpayer A represents that Amount 1 continues to be invested in Fund C
and has not been used for any other purpose.

Based on the above facts and representations, Taxpayer A requests a waiver of
_ the 60-day requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Code with respect
to the distribution of Amount 1 from IRA B.

Section 408(a) of the Code defines an IRA to mean a trust created or organized
in the United States, and requires that the trustee be a bank or an approved non-
bank trustee.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in
section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in
gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner
provided under section 72.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.

201519043

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) does not apply
to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if:

(i) the entire amount received (including money or any other property) is
paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after
the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such
individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or
distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into
such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible
in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply
to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from
an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt
such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i)
from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of the application
of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for
partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section
408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary of the Treasury may
waive the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D)
where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good
conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable
control of the individual subject to such requirement.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, provides that the Service will issue a
ruling waiving the 60-day rollover requirement in cases where the failure to waive
such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster or other events beyond the reasonable control of the taxpayer.

In determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant
facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution;
(2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization,
incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the
use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,

whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution
occurred.

The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A are
consistent with his assertion that the failure to complete a rollover of the
distribution of Amount 1 from IRA B was due to false assurances by Individual G
and Financial Institution F that Taxpayer A’s investment in Fund C constituted an
IRA account.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service waives the
60-day rollover period with respect to Amount 1. Provided all other requirements
of section 408(d)(3), except the 60-day requirement, will be met with respect to
the contribution of Amount 1 to an IRA, Amount 1 will be considered a rollover
contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3).

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations
which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling
is being sent to your authorized representative.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact
at . Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T1.

Sincerely yours,

Carlton A. Watkins

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Notice of Intention to Disclose
Deleted copy of this letter

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2015, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.